Skip to main content
Log in

Egg and seed removal at urban and suburban forest edges

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predation rates of natural and artificial bird nests in rural landscapes have been the subject of numerous studies, often in the context of proximity to edge. Similar studies in urban and suburban landscapes are lacking. We carried out a study of egg and seed removal at forest reserve edges in three urban and two suburban forests in and near New York City in 1994-1995. Few significant edge effects were found, but this may have been because of the extraordinarily high rates of egg and seed removal. Daily removal rates were higher in suburban sites (eggs, 86%; seeds, 95%) than in urban sites (eggs, 64%; seeds, 88%). Exposed seeds and eggs suffered higher rates of removal than seeds and eggs covered by leaf litter. Despite statistically significant differences among treatments, all of these rates would be prohibitively high if experienced by ground-nesting birds or large-seeded trees (if removal was associated with predation). A survey of the literature suggests that egg predation rates are prohibitively high in cities and peak in suburban sites (at least in this study), then drop rapidly in ex-urban and rural sites, perhaps because of a similar pattern in the abundance of corvid bird predators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alverson, W. S., Kuhlman, W. and Waller, D. M. (1994) Wild forests: conservation biology and public policy. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alverson, W. S., Waller, D. M. and Solheim, S. L. (1988) Forests too deer: edge effects in northern Wisconsin. Conserv.Biol. 2, 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andren, H. (1992) Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation: a landscape perspective. Ecology 73, 794–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andren, H. (1995) Effects of landscape composition on predation rates at habitat edges. In Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes (L. Hansson L. Fahrig and G. Merriam, eds), pp. 225–255. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andren, H. and Angelstam, P. (1988) Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: experimental evidence. Ecology 69, 544–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. B. (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol.Appl. 6, 506–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M. A. and Breland, B. (1996) Foraging of gray squirrels on an urban-rural gradient: use of GUD to assess anthropogenic impact. Ecol.Appl. 6, 1135–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkey, T. (1993) Edge effects in seed and egg predation at two neotropical rainforest sites. Biol.Conserv. 66, 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGraaf, R. M. and Angelstam, P. (1996) Effects of timber size-class on predation of artificial nests in extensive forest. Forest Ecol.Manag. 61, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. T. (1974) An urban bird community in Tuscon, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76, 184–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H. A. and Cronquist, A. (1991) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyn, K. L. and Clark, R. G. (1997) Cover characteristics and success of natural and artificial duck nests. J.Field Ornithol. 68, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, M. J. and Hunter, M. L. (1996) Effects of landscape forest coverage on nest predation rates and edge effects: a synthesis. Bull.Ecol.Soc.Am.(Suppl.) 77, 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D. G. (1995a) Forest fragmentation and nest predation – are experiments with Japanese quail eggs mis-leading? Auk 112, 767–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D. G. (1995b) A reevaluation of the effects of forest fragmentation on rates of bird-nest predation. Conserv.Biol. 9, 1316–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D. G. (1996) Do bright colors at nests incur a cost due to predation? Evol.Ecol. 10, 285–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlack, G. R. (1993) Sociological edge effects – spatial distribution of human impact in suburban forest fragments. Environ.Manag. 17, 829–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M. J. and Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71, 1232–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murcia, C. (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests – implications for conservation. Trends Ecol.Evol. 10, 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myster, R. W. and Pickett, S. T. A. (1993) Effects of litter, distance, density and vegetation patch type on postdis-persal tree seed predation in old fields. Oikos 66, 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nour, N., Matthysen, E. and Dhondt, A. A. (1993) Artificial nest predation and habitat fragmentation – different trends in bird and mammal predators. Ecography 16, 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, P. W. C. (1994) The effects of edge on avian nest success: how strong is the evidence? Conserv.Biol. 8, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat, R. V. and McDonnell, M. J. (1991) Heavy metal accumulations in forest soils along an urban-rural gradient in southeastern New York, USA. Water Air Soil Pollut. 57–58, 797—807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. K., Thompson, F. R., Donovan, T. M., Whitehead, D. R. and Faaborg, J. (1995) Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267, 1987–1990.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, N. S. (1992) Comparison between urban and rural bird communities in prairie Saskatchewan – urbanization and short-term population trends. Can.Field Nat. 10, 210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telleria, J. L. and Santos, T. (1992) Spatiotemporal patterns of egg predation in forest islands – an experimental approach. Biol.Conserv. 62, 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen, W. M. and DeGraaf, R. M. (1993) Predation on artificial nests in forested riparian buffer strips. J.Wildl.Manag. 60, 542–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D. S., McLellan, C. H. and Dobson, A. P. (1986) Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. In Conservation biology (M. E. Soule, ed), pp. 237–256. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willebrand, T. and Marcstrom, V. (1988) On the danger of using dummy nests to study predation. Auk 105, 378–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahner, R. H. and Mahan, C. G. (1996) Depredation of artificial ground nests in a managed, forested landscape. Conserv.Biol. 10, 285–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. P. (1995) Landscape mosaics created by canopies gaps, forest edges, and bushland glades. Selbeyana 15, 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, C., Young, T.P. Egg and seed removal at urban and suburban forest edges. Urban Ecosystems 1, 171–178 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018575527910

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018575527910

Navigation