Skip to main content
Log in

The Presidio Trust legislation: preservation or privatization?

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This analysis of the Presidio Trust legislation places the recent developments on the Presidio in the context of a century and a half of environmental planning. By first exploring the Presidio's history, and then tracing the more recent legislative background to the Presidio Trust, the author establishes a clear frame through which to explore the current challenges that face the Presidio Trust. This paper argues that history, legislative intent, and specific legal precedent will protect the Presidio from being "sold off," despite growing local concerns that the Presidio Trust's mandate to become financially self-sufficient within 15 years may drive the public's interests from the park.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 5 §551 et seq. Administrative Procedures Act.

  • 10 U.S.C. §2687–2905 (b). Base Closures and Realignment Act.

  • 16 U.S.C. §1 et seq. National Parks Organic Act of 1916.

  • 16 U.S.C. §408(3). National Parks Organic Act.

  • 16 U.S.C. §459b. The Cape Cod National Seashore Act of 1961.

  • 16 U.S.C. §470 et seq. National Historic Preservation Act of 1962.

  • 16 U.S.C. §2501–2514. Urban Parks and Recreation Recovery Act of 1978.

  • 40 U.S.C. §871 et seq. The Pennsylvania Avenue Development Act of 1972.

  • 42 U.S.C. §4332 et seq. National Environmental Policy Act.

  • 42 U.S.C. §11301 et seq. Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act.

  • PL 87–126. An Act to Establish the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation.

  • PL 92–589. An Act to Establish the Golden Gate National Recreation Area in the State of California.

  • PL 104–333. An Act to Establish the Presidio Trust.

  • Anonymous. (1992) Final Santa Monica Mountains Deal Praised. National Parks. 66, 11.

  • Anonymous. (1995) Legislators advance Anti-Park Agenda. National Parks. 69, 10.

  • Anonymous. (1996a) Demolishing Presidio history. Bay Guardian, January 31.

  • Anonymous. (1996b) Fees to increase for National Parks. San Francisco Chronicle, November 27.

  • Anonymous. (1996c) Presidio Bill is an insult. Bay Guardian, May 8.

  • Anonymous. (1996d) Presidio Trust Bill signed. San Francisco Chronicle, November 13.

  • Anonymous. (1996e) Stop the Presidio sacrifice. Bay Guardian, October 2.

  • Boxer, B. (1996a) Speech at the Presidio, October 11.

  • Boxer, B. (1996b) Speech at the Institute for Governmental Studies. University of California at Berkeley, October 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler B. (1996) Meeting of the Golden Gate National Recreation Advisory Commissions. Subcommittee on the Presidio, November 13.

  • Congressional Record. (1996) H.R. 1296/S. 594. Floor Debate, May 1, CR S4509.

  • Conservation Law Foundation, et al. v. Harper, et al. (1984) 587 F. Supp. 357.

  • Dibble, D. (1996) Presidio Principles. San Francisco Bay Guardian, May 8. Don't Tear It Down, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation. (1984) 579 F. Supp. 1382.

  • Finley, M. (1996) Meeting with author at Yellowstone National Park. July 6.

  • Foresta, R. A. (1984) America's National Parks and Their Keepers. Resources For the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedstrom, E. (1992) Preservation or profit? National Parks. 66, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • House Hearings. (1981) Committee on Oversight, Subcommittee on Government Operations and Metropolitan Affairs. “Progress Report on the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation.” October 14.

  • Jacobs, J. (1995) A Rage for Justice: The Passion and Politics of Phil Burton. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langelier, J. P. (1992) Bastion by the Bay. The Author, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • League of Conservation Voters (1994) National Environmental Scorecard. League of Conservation Voters, Washington.

  • Lockhead, C. (1996) Presidio Veto Threat. San Francisco Chronicle, September 26.

  • McCutcheon, C. (1996) Presidio's Legislative Odyssey Reflects Partisan Politics, Procedural Pitfalls. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 54, 2388.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service. (1994a) Draft General Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement. Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Presidio of San Francisco.

  • National Park Service. (1994b) Final General Management Plan Amendment. Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Presidio of San Francisco.

  • National Park Service. (1993) Presidio Building Leasing and Financing Implementation Strategy. Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Presidio of San Francisco.

  • Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation. (1974) Historic Preservation Plan: Pennsylvania Avenue Devel-opment Corporation. Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. (1996) Presentation at “Sustainability Roundtable.” Presidio Alliance, November 25.

  • Ridenour, J. (1994) The National Parks Compromised: Pork Barrel Politics and America's Treasures. ICS Books, Merrillville, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, J. (1976) “Helpless Giants: The National Parks and the Regulation of Private Lands.” 75 Mich.L.Rev. 239.

  • Senate Hearings. (1995) Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Parks, Historic Preservation, and Recreation. “Presidio Trust,” June 29.

  • Senate Hearings. (1972) Committee on the Interior and Insular Affairs, Subcommittee on Parks and Recreation. “Pennsylvania National Historic Site.” September 21.

  • Tauber, I. and Tauber, C. (1971) People of the United States in the 20th Century. GPO, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (1985) “Cape Cod National Seashore: Federal Administration.” 12 B.C.Envtl.Aff.L.Rev. 225.

  • Thompson, E. and Woodbridge, S. (1992) Presidio of San Francisco: An Outline of its Evolution as a U.S.Army Post, 1847–1990. Department of the Interior, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D. (1972) The Class Imperative: The 'Greening' and 'Bluing' of America. In National Parks for the Future. The Conservation Foundation, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trelstad, B.R. The Presidio Trust legislation: preservation or privatization?. Urban Ecosystems 1, 135–153 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018571427001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018571427001

Navigation