Skip to main content
Log in

The dependence of osteoblastic response on variations in the chemical composition and physical properties of hydroxyapatite

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two synthetic hydroxyapatite powders (A and B), supplied by differentmanufacturers, were physically and chemically characterized before being diepressed and sintered at 1250°C. The powders were characterized using X-raydiffraction (XRD), infrared spectroscopy (IRS), X-ray fluorescence, surface areaanalysis (BET), particle size analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).The materials were then pressed and sintered to produce hydroxyapatite discs ofsimilar densities and grain sizes for in vitro evaluation. The ceramicswere seeded with osteoblastic cells and after 15 days in culture the cellmorphology was assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), theultrastructure of the cells was studied using transmission electron microscopy(TEM) with EDAX, and the rate of cell growth was assessed using biochemicaltechniques. The results clearly showed that the rate of cell proliferation butnot the rate of alkaline phosphatase production, was highl!y dependent on the composition of the hydroxyapatite powders that were used to makethe ceramic discs. The ultrastructural studies confirmed the relativeviabilities of the cells and the nature of the ceramic interface indicatingvisually the marked differences in the performance of the two materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. AKAO, H. AOKI and K. KATO, J. Mater. Sci. 16 (1981) 809.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. W. DENISSEN, K. DEGROOT, A. A. DRIESSEN, J. G. C. WOLKE, J. G. J. PEELEN, H. J. A. VAN DIJK, A. P. GEHRING and P. J. KLOPPER, Sci. Ceram. 10 (1980) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. DE WITH, H. J. A. van DIJK and N. HATTU, Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 31 (1981) 181.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. DE WITH, H. J. A. van DIJK, N. HATTU and K. PRIJS, J. Mater. Sci. 16 (1981) 1592.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. A. DRIESSENS, C. P. A. T. KLEIN and K. DEGROOT, Biomaterials(Commun.) 3 (1982) 113.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. JARCHO, C. H. BOLEN, M. B. THOMAS, J. BOBICK, J. F. KAY and R. H. DOREMUS, J. Mater. Sci. 11 (1976) 2027.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. KIJIMA and M. TSUTSUMI, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 62 (1979) 455.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. ROOTARE and R. G. CRAIG, J. Oral Rehab. 5 (1978) 293.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. B. THOMAS, R. H. DOREMUS, M. JARCHO and R. L. SALSBURY, J. Mater. Sci. 15 (1980) 891.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. NAGAI and Y. NISHIMURA, US Patent no. 4,548,59, October 1985.

  11. S. BEST, W. BONFIELD and C. DOYLE, in Bioceramics 1: Proceedings of the 1st International Bioceramic Symposium, edited by H. Oonishi, H. Aoki and K. Sawai (Ishiyaku Euro-America Inc., 1989) pp. 6873.

  12. Idem., in Bioceramics 2: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Ceramics in Medicine, edited by G. Heimke (Deutsche Keramische Gesellschaft e.V, 1990) pp. 5764.

  13. S. PUAJINDANETR, S. BEST and W. BONFIELD, in Bioceramics 5: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Ceramics in Medicine, edited by T. Yamamuro, T. Kukubo and T. Nakamura (Kobunshi Kankikai Inc., 1992) pp. 2329.

  14. Idem. Brit. Ceram. Trans. 93 (1994) 96.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. BEST and W. BONFIELD, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 5 (1994) 516.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. BEST, PhD thesis, University of London, 1990.

  17. B. T. GARVEY and R. BIZIOS, J. Appl. Biomater. 5 (1984) 39.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. AKAO, M. SAKATSUME, H. AOKI, T. TAKAGI and T. S. SASAKI, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 4 (1993) 569.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. B. BAGAMBISA, U. JOOS and W. SCHILLI, Int. J. Oral Maxillofacial Implants 5 (1990) 217.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. A. PULEO, L. A. HOLLERAN, R. H. DOREMUS and R. BIZIOS, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25 (1991) 711.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. F. BASLE, A. REBEL, F. GRIZON, G. DACULSI, N. PASSUTI and R. FILMAN, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 4 (1993) 273.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. G. T. GEESINK, K. DE GROOT and C. P. A. T. KLEIN, J. Bone Joint Surg. 70-B (1988) 17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. A. JANSEN, J. P. C. M. VAN DER WAERDEN and J. G. C. WOLKE, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 4 (1993) 466.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. P. A. T. KLEIN, P. PATKA, J. G. C. WOLKE, J. M. A. de BLIECK-HOGERVORST and K. de GROOT, Biomaterials 15 (1994) 146.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. WILKE, J. ORTH, M. KRAFT and P. GRISS, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 4 (1993) 260.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. SØBALLE, E. S. HANSEN, H. BORKSTEDT-RASMUSSEN, P. H. JØRGENSEN and C. BÜNGER, J. Orthop. Res. 10 (1992) 285.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Z. LEGEROS, Adv. Dent. Res. 2 (1988) 164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BEST , S., SIM , B., KAYSER , M. et al. The dependence of osteoblastic response on variations in the chemical composition and physical properties of hydroxyapatite. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 8, 97–103 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018558816871

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018558816871

Keywords

Navigation