Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eco-labelling: success or failure?

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eco-labelling was identified in Agenda 21 as a way of encouraging consumers to alter their consumption patterns and to make wiser use of resources and energy in the drive for sustainable development into the next century. A European-wide eco-labelling scheme was introduced by the European Commission (EC) in 1992 as part of its fifth and most recent Environmental Action Plan, the focus of which is also sustainability. The EC eco-labelling scheme aims to promote products with reduced environmental impacts throughout their life cycle and to provide consumers with better information about the environmental impact of products. This paper assesses whether eco-labelling is an effective means of improving the environment, using the eco-labelling of paper products as a case study. Paper products are examined because the development of their ecolabelling criteria has been a particularly complex and contentious issue. Moreover, although criteria have now been adopted for three groups of paper products, controversy has dominated the criteria-setting process and debate continues about the relevance of the selected criteria. It is concluded that while the concept of eco-labelling is good, the practical application of the concept is not straightforward. Furthermore, at present, there is little evidence of eco-labelling benefitting the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvind, S.S. and Muley, E.V. (1995) Labelling ecofriendly products in India-an emerging option for environmental protection. The Environmentalist 15 (2), 115–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.A. and Miner, K.J. (1993) Corporate environ-mentalism: cooperation or co-optation? J. Environ. Health 56(9), 25–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, T. and Rubik, F. (1993) Evaluating techniques for eco-balances and life cycle assessment. Eur. Environ. 3(3), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethge, P.O. (1991) Eco-labelling of Paper Products: Possi-bilities and Problems. Copenhagen: Ministry of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, C. and Howell, B. (1992) Life cycle assessment: a tool for solving environmental problems? Eur. Environ. 2(2), 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. (1995) Eco-labelling: creating a greener environ-ment. Geography Review8(3), 24–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. (1996) Recycling and the environmental debate: a question of social conscience or scientific reason. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 39(3), 333–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1993a) Towards Sustainability: a European Union Programme of Policy and Action in Relation to the Environment and Sustain-able Development. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1993b) Commis-sion Information on Eco-labelling. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1994a) Commis-sion Decision of 14 November Establishing the Ecological Criteria for the Award of the Community Eco-label to Toilet Paper/Kitchen Roll. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1994b) The Commission Adopts Ecological Criteria for a Further Three Product Groups Within the Framework of the Community Voluntary Eco-award Scheme. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1996) Commis-sion Decision of 1996 Establishing the Ecological Criteria for the Award of the Community Eco-label to Copying Paper. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, D. and Winward, J. (1991) Information failures in green consumerism. Consumer Policy Rev. 1(2), 83–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, M.A. (1993) Broad-based environmental life cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol.27(3), 430–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, N. (1995) Forest networks. The Environmentalist 15(3), 182–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, S. (1994) Business, trust and environmental informa-tion: perceptions from consumers and retailers. Business Strategy Environ. 3(4), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Watch: Western Europe (1996) Commission suggests "graduated" EU ecolabel. Environ. Watch: W. Europe5, 21 June, 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, C.C. and Collins, L. (1996) Corporate response of European paper companies to voluntary environmental initiatives. Eco-Manage. Auditing3(6), 126–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Economic Communities (1992) Council Regulation (EEC) No. 880/92 of 23 March 1992 on a Community eco-label award scheme. Off. J. Eur. Commun.35, 1–6.

  • Fleming, D. (1992) Eco-labelling. Eur. Environ.2(1), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friends of the Earth (1993) Timber Certification and Ecolabelling. London: Friends of the Earth.

  • Guinée, J.B., Udo de Haes, H.A. and Huppes, G. (1993a) Quantitative life cycle assessment of products (1. goal definition and inventory). J. Cleaner Product. 1(1), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée, J.B., Udo de Haes, H.A. and Huppes, G. (1993b) Quantitative life cycle assessment of products (2. clas-sification, valuation and improvement analysis).J. Cleaner Product. 1(2), 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, N. (1992) Manual of Environmental Policy: The EC and Britain. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillary, R. (1995) Environmental reporting requirements under the EU: eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS).The Environmentalist15(4), 293–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.P. (1993) The Earth Summit: The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. London: Graham & Trotman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenel, U. (1992) Life cycle analysis explained. Materials Environ.8(11), 589–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. (1991) The rise of the green consumer. Con-sumer Policy Rev.1(2), 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (1995) Learning the hard way: the EC and the eco-label. Eur. Environ.5(6), 165–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paper Europe (1995) 1995 group comes of age. Paper Europe7(2), 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J.F. (1994) A more positive environmental outlook. The Environmentalist 14(2), 81–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M.R. (1995) Global environmental change: the contribution of social science research policy in the UK. The Environmentalist15(4), 240–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, G. (1994) Product-oriented environmental policy in Europe. Eur. Environ.4(5), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report (1993) Critical review of LCA practice. The Ends Report219, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report (1994a) The elusive consensus on life-cycle assessment. The Ends Report231, 20–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report (1994b) Public concern for the environment rides the recession. The Ends Report 232, 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report(1994c) Green issues making a mark with mainstream consumers. The Ends Report239, 23–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report (1994d) Poor data quality undermines LCA results. The Ends Report239, 25–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report (1996a) Paints and light bulbs-a tale of two eco-labels. The Ends Report252, 24–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report(1996b) Eco-labelling review launched as textile criteria agreed. The Ends Report254, 27–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report (1996c) Business interest growing in EC eco-labelling scheme. The Ends Report256, 27.

  • The Ends Report (1996d) Brussels seeks to offoad eco-labelling scheme. The Ends Report257, 25–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report (1996e) Eco-label accord on copying paper despite industry objections. The Ends Report257, 26–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ends Report (1997) Reckitt gets first Eco-label for laundry detergent. The Ends Report 268, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ethical Consumer (1994) The EC Eco-label-marketing ploy or award for excellence? The Ethical Consumer32, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietje, C. (1995) Voluntary eco-labelling programmes and questions of state responsibility in the WTO/GATT legal system.J. World Trade29(5), 123–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Eco-labelling Board (1996) UKEB Newsletter No. 10. London: UK Eco-labelling Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Eco-labelling Board (1997) UKEB Newsletter No. 11. London: UK Eco-labelling Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umweltbundesamt (1995) Information Sheet on the "Environ-mental label". Berlin: Umweltbundesamt., Agenda 21, The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. New York: United Nations.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (1993) Status Report on the Use of Environmental Labels Worldwide. US Washington: United States Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verlander, N. (1990) Label it! Earth Matters8, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R. (1992) A guide to eco-labelling and the EC eco-labelling scheme. Eur. Environ. 2(6), 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. (1993) Eco-labels or eco-alibis?Chem. Indust.5 April, 260.

  • Wood, K. (1994) The role of life cycle analysis in developing environmental marketing and communications strategy, Business Strategy & the Environment Conference Proceedings.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK

    Camilla C. Erskine & Lyndhurst Collins

Authors
  1. Camilla C. Erskine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lyndhurst Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erskine, C.C., Collins, L. Eco-labelling: success or failure?. The Environmentalist 17, 125–133 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018552000651

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018552000651

Keywords

Search

Navigation