Abstract
Thin films of cuprous oxide (4.6 μm) were electrodeposited on molybdenum. Gold contacts were vacuum evaporated on the films to form devices. These films showed relatively low electrical resistivities at around 106 Ω cm and a charge transport mechanism which is different from the space charge limited current conduction previously reported for the 1011 Ω cm films. The charge transport mechanism in these films was determined by isothermal measurements of the devices current-voltage (I–V) characteristics at some selected temperatures in the range of 78–321 K. In this temperature range the dominant transport mechanism can be explained by the Poole-Frenkel effect through the relation I = VG0exp(−φ0L/kT)exp(BLV1/2)+I0exp(−φ0H/kT)exp(BHV1/2) where the numerical values of the parameters are measured. φ0L = 0.12 eV is the zero-field ionization energy of a shallow acceptor-type level (measured from the edge of the valence band) which has the dominant effect in the range of 78–230 K. Similarly φ0H = 0.70 eV corresponds to a deep level dominant in the high-temperature range 230–321 K. In the high-temperature region a 2.7 μm thick hole accumulation layer forms beneath the oxide-gold interface, assuming the ionized deep level is doubly charged.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. E. RAKHSHANI, Solid State Electron. 29 (1986) 7.
B. P. RAI, Solar Cells 25 (1988) 265.
A. K. MUKHOPADHYAY, A. K. CHAKRABORTY, A. P. CHATTERJEE and S. K. LAHIRI, Thin Solid Films 209 (1992) 92.
A. P. CHATTERJEE, A. K. MUKHOPADHYAY, A. K. CHAKRABORTY, R. N. SASMAL and S. K. LAHIRI, Mater. Lett. 11 (1991) 358.
A. E. RAKHSHANI and J. VARGHESE, Thin Solid Films 157 (1988) 87.
Idem, Solar Energy Mater. 15 (1987) 237.
I. GROZDANOV, Mater. Lett. 19 (1994) 281.
A. E. RAKHSHANI, J. Appl. Phys. 69 (1991) 2365.
Idem, ibid. 69 (1991) 2290.
A. E. RAKHSHANI, A. A. AL-JASSAR and J. VARGHESE, Thin Solid Films 148 (1987) 191.
A. E. RAKHSHANI and J. VARGHESE, Phys. Status Solidi 101a (1987) 479.
J. G. SIMMONS, in ‘‘DC Conduction in Thin Films’’, edited by J. G. Cook (Mills and Boon, London, 1971) p. 1.
S. M. SZE, ‘‘Physics of Semiconductor Devices’‘’ (Wiley, New York, 1969) pp. 364, 469).
J. FRENKEL, Tech. Phys. 5 (1938) 685.
Idem, J. Phys. Rev. 54 (1938) 647.
C. A. MEAD, Phys. Rev. 128 (1962) 2088.
J. G. SIMMONS, ibid. 155 (1967) 657.
E. H. RHODERICK, in ‘‘Metal–Semiconductor Contacts’’, (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1978).
M. MISSOUS and E. H. RHODERICK, J. Appl. Phys. 69 (1991) 7142.
R. M. HILL, Thin Solid Films 1 (1967) 39.
D. S. CAMPBELL, in ‘‘Active and Passive Thin Film Devices’’, edited by T. J. Coutts (Academic Press, London 1978) p. 113.
A. K. JONSCHER, Thin Solid Films 1 (1967) 213.
J. J. MARES, J. KRISTOFIK and V. SMID, Solid State Electron. 31 (1988) 1309.
W. R. BUCHWALD and N. M. JOHNSON, J. Appl. Phys. 64 (1988) 958.
K. MOORJANI and C. FELDMAN, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 4 (1970) 248.
S. M. SZE, J. Appl. Phys. 38 (1967) 2951.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RAKHSHANI, A.E., MAKDISI, Y. & MATHEW, X. The Poole-Frenkel conduction mechanismin Mo-Cu2O-Au thin film structures. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 8, 207–211 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018506516020
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018506516020