Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 685–696 | Cite as

Evidence for the reproductive isolation of Dermacentor marginatus and Dermacentor reticulatus (Acari: Ixodidae) ticks based on cross-breeding, morphology and molecular studies

  • M. Zahler
  • R. Gothe


The species status of Dermacentor marginatus and Dermacentor reticulatus was evaluated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination of adult ticks, cross-breeding experiments and molecular biological analysis of eggs derived from transspecific pairings. The SEM investigations including the morphometric quantification of phenotypic features resulted in an unequivocal differentiation of adult D. marginatus and D. reticulatus ticks. The cross-breeding experiments demonstrated that irrespective of whether female ticks of both species were applied with con- or transspecific male ticks or without males to sheep, they engorged and laid eggs. The larvae, however, developed only in eggs which originated from conspecific matings. A nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) using the DNA of eggs from transspecific pairings and sequencing of the PCR products revealed two different genotypes. The genotypes of eggs originating from D. marginatus and D. reticulatus females of these pairings differed. However, the eggs deposited by D. marginatus always possessed the same two genotypes as did the eggs produced by D. reticulatus. These results argue for a strict reproductive isolation of D. marginatus and D. reticulatus and, therefore, for a separate species status.

Dermacentor marginatus Dermacentor reticulatus nested PCR internal transcribed spacer scanning electron microscopy cross-breeding 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arthur, D.R. 1960. Ticks. A Monograph of the Ixodoidea. Part V on the Genera Dermacentor, Anocentor, Cosmiomma, Boophilus & Margaropus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Babos, S. 1964. Die Zeckenfauna Mitteleuropas. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.Google Scholar
  3. Davey, R.B. and Hilburn, L.R. 1991. Reduction in egg viability resulting from infestations on cattle of hybridized Boophilus ticks and Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) at various ratios. J. Med. Entomol. 28: 763–769.Google Scholar
  4. Dias, J.A. T.S., Caeiro, V., Simoes, A.L. and Nuncio, M.S. 1993. Algumas consideracoes acerca das especies do genero Dermacentor Koch, 1844 (Acarina-Ixodoidea) existentes em Portugal. Garcia de Orta, Ser. Zool., Lisboa 18: 13–18.Google Scholar
  5. Diehl, P.A., Aeschlimann, A. and Obenchain, F.D. 1982. Tick reproduction: oogenesis and oviposition. In Physiology of ticks, F.D. Obenchain and R. Galun (eds), pp. 277–350. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Estrada-Peña, A. and Estrada-Peña, R. 1992. Notes on Dermacentor (Acari:Ixodidae) ticks (IV): morphological covariation of D. marginatus (Sulzer). Acarologia 33: 245–259.Google Scholar
  7. Friedhoff, K.T. 1988. Transmission of Babesia. In Babesiosis of domestic animals and man, M Ristic (ed.), pp. 23–52. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  8. Gilot, B. and Pautou, G. 1983. Repartition et ecologie de Dermacentor marginatus (Sulzer, 1776) (Ixodoidea) dans les Alpes Francaises et leur avant-pays. Acarologia 24: 261–273.Google Scholar
  9. Gilot, B., Pichot, J. and Douche, B. 1989. Les tiques du Massif Central (France). 1. Les Ixodides (Acariens, Ixodoidea) parasites de carnivores et d'ongules domestiques sur la bordure orientale du Massif. Acarologia 30: 191–207.Google Scholar
  10. Gladney, W.J. and Dawkins, C.C. 1973. Experimental interspecific mating of Amblyomma maculatum and A. americanum. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 60: 1093–1097.Google Scholar
  11. Guglielmone, A.A. and Mangold, A.J. 1993. Cross-breeding between Amblyomma parvum Aragao, 1908 and Amblyomma pseudoparvum Guglielmone, Mangold et Keirans, 1980 (Acari: Ixodidae). Folia Parasitol. 40: 144–145.Google Scholar
  12. Hausschild, S. and Schein, E. 1996. Zur Artspezifität von Babesia canis. Berl. Muench. Tieraerztl. Wochenschr. 109: 216–219.Google Scholar
  13. Immler, R.M. 1973. Untersuchungen zur Biologie und Ökologie der Zecke Dermacentor reticulatus (Fabricius, 1794) (Ixodidae) in einem endemischen Vorkommensgebiet. Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 46: 1–70.Google Scholar
  14. Krauss, A., Weber, A., Enders, B., Schiefer, H.G., Slenczka, W. and Zahner, H. (1997). Zoonosen. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Köln.Google Scholar
  15. Liebisch, A. 1979. Ecology and distribution of Q-fever rickettsiae in Europe with special reference to Germany. In Recent advances in acarology 2, J.E. Rodriguez (ed.), pp. 225–231. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Liebisch, A. and Rahman, M.S. 1976. Zum Vorkommen und zur vektoriellen Bedeutung der Zecken Dermacentor marginatus (Sulzer, 1776) und Dermacentor reticulatus (Fabricius, 1794) in Deutschland. Tropenmed. Parasitol. 27: 393–404.Google Scholar
  17. Mayr, E. 1975. Grundlagen der Zoologischen Systematik. Paul Parey, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  18. Nosek, J. 1972. The ecology and public health importance of Dermacentor marginatus and D. reticulatus ticks in Central Europe. Folia Parasitol. 19: 93–102.Google Scholar
  19. Oliver, J.H. 1986. Induction of oogenesis and oviposition in ticks. In Morphology, physiology, and behavioural biology of ticks, J.R. Sauer and J.A. Hair (eds), pp. 233–247. Ellis Horwood Limited, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Oliver, J.H. 1989. Biology and systematics of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 397–430.Google Scholar
  21. Oliver, J.H., Wilkinson, P.R. and Kohls, G.M. 1972. Observations on hybridization of three species of North American Dermacentor ticks. J. Parasitol. 58: 380–384.Google Scholar
  22. Oliver, J.H., Owsley, M.R., Hutcheson, H.J., Chen, C., Irby, W.S., Dotson, E.M. and McLain, D.E. 1993. Conspecificity of the ticks Ixodes scapularis and I. dammini (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 30: 54–63.Google Scholar
  23. Pomerantzev, B.J. 1950. Ixodidae. Engl. Übersetzung: Elbl, A. (1959). The American Institute of Biological Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Roman, E. and Jehl, H. 1948. Les Dermacentors (Acarien, Ixodidae) du bassin du Rhone. Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 17: 102–106.Google Scholar
  25. Scheuer, H., Schöl, H., Göbel, E. and Gothe, R. 1996. Morphology of the foveal glands and foveae dorsales in male Hyalomma truncatum and Rhipicephalus evertsi mimeticus (Acari: Ixodidae) before and during feeding. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 20: 511–532.Google Scholar
  26. Seetharam, S. and Dicker, I.B. 1991. A rapid and compete 4-step protocol for obtaining nucleotide sequences from E. coli genomic DNA from overnight cultures. Biotechniques 11: 32–33.Google Scholar
  27. Siewing, R. (ed.) 1980. Lehrbuch der Zoologic. Bd. 1: Allgemeine Zoologie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  28. Sonenshine, D.E. 1993. Biology of Ticks, Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Zahler, M. 1994. Zur Ökologie von Dermacentor reticulatus (Fabricius, 1794) (Parasitiformes: Ixodida: Ixodidae). Vet. Med. Diss. München.Google Scholar
  30. Zahler, M., Gothe, R. and Rinder, H. 1995. Genetic evidence against a morphologically suggestive conspecificity of Dermacentor reticulatus and D. marginatus (Acari: Ixodidae). Int. J. Parasitol. 25: 1413–1419.Google Scholar
  31. Zahler, M., Gothe, R. and Rinder, H. 1996. Dermacentor-Zecken in Frankreich und Deutschland. Zur molekularbiologischen Artdifferenzierung, Ökologie und epidemiologischen Bedeutung. Tieraerztl. Prax. 24: 209–211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Zahler
    • 1
  • R. Gothe
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Comparative Tropical Medicine and ParasitologyUniversity of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations