Skip to main content
Log in

Marginal Rates and Two-dimensional Level Curves in DEA

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Of great importance to management, the computation of trade-offs presents particular difficulties within DEA since the piecewise linear nature of the envelopment surfaces does not allow for unique derivatives at every point. We present a comprehensive framework for analyzing marginal rates, and directional derivatives in general, on DEA frontiers. A useful characterization of these derivatives at given points can be provided in terms of the ranges they can take; equivalently, the bounds of these ranges correspond to derivatives “to the right”and “to the left” at these points. We present two approaches for their computation: first, the dual equivalents calculation of minimum and maximum multiplier ratios / finite differences, and then a modified simplex tableau method. The simplex tableau method provides a more general application of the method introduced by Hackman et al. (1994) to generate any two-dimensional section of the isoquant and is a practical tool to generate level plots of the frontier. By giving a complete picture of trade-offs and allowing a better visualization of high dimensional production possibility sets, these tools can be very useful for managerial applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A. I., and L. M. Seiford. (1993). “The Mathematical Programming Approach to Efficiency Analysis.” In H. O. Fried, K. C. A. Lovell, and S. S. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, W. F. (1992). Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Third edition. New York: Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. (1984). “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., and R. M. Thrall. (1992). “Estimation of Returns to Scale using Data Envelopment Analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 62, 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessent, A., W. Bessent, J. Elam, and T. Clark. (1988). “Efficiency Frontier Determination by Constrained Facet Analysis.” Operations Research 36, 785–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz. (1985). “Foundations of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans Efficient Empirical Production Functions.” Journal of Econometrics 30, 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, A. Lewin, and L. M. Seiford. (1995). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and R. M. Thrall. (1991). “A Structure for Classifying and Characterizing Efficiency and Inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 2, 197–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilingerian, J. A. (1995). “Evaluating Physician Efficiency in Hospitals: A Multivariate Analysis of Best Practices.” European Journal of Operational Research 80, 548–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jr., J. E. (1983). Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. Englewood, New Jersey.

  • Fukuda, K. (1993). “cdd.c: C-Implementation of the Double Description Method for Computing All Vertices and Extremal Rays of a Convex Polyhedron given a System of Linear inequalities.” Dept. of Mathematics, Swiss Federal Inst. of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golany, B., and G. Yu.(1994). “Estimating Returns to Scale in DEA.” European Journal of Operational Research, forthcoming.

  • Hackman, S. T., U. Passy, and L. K. Platzman. (1994). “Explicit Representation of the Two-Dimensional Section of a Prodcution Possibility Set.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 5, 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradi, J. C., D. N. Reese, and D. Rosen. (1995). “Applications of DEA to Measure the Efficiency of Software Production at Two Large Canadian Banks.” Annals of Operations Research, in press.

  • Schaffnit, C., D. Rosen, and J. C. Paradi. (1995). “Envisioning DEA.” Working paper, CMTE, University of Toronto presented at the INFORMS International Meeting, Singapore, June 25–28, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, H. D. (1984). “Data Envelopment Analysis as a New Managerial Audit Methodology-Test and Evaluation.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 4, 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis, E. (1993). “A Comparison of Regression Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis as Alternative Methods of Performance Assessment.” J. Operational Research Society 44(11), 1129–1144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosen, D., Schaffnit, C. & Paradi, J.C. Marginal Rates and Two-dimensional Level Curves in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9, 205–232 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018382904489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018382904489

Navigation