Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 6, Issue 7, pp 959–978 | Cite as

Application to the terrestrial vertebrates of Italy of a system proposed by IUCN for a new classification of national Red List categories

  • Francesco Pinchera
  • Luigi Boitani
  • Fabio Corsi


The criteria for classification set down in the new system of the IUCN Red List categories were applied to national distribution areas. Application of the new criteria to national distribution areas calls for an estimate of the rate of immigration. Classification was applied to the Italian autochthonous terrestrial vertebrate species that reproduce in Italy (Amphibia, Reptilia, Aves and Mammalia). Species with both marine and land habitats were included, but Cetaceans were excluded. Eighty-eight species of the autochthonous species that reproduce in Italy were classified in the threatened categories at the national level. One of the main purposes of the present classification of the risk of extinction in national distribution areas is to provide the information needed to define global conservation priorities of species present on national territory. The species nationally and/or globally endangered or at lower risk were grouped into four priority classes, on the basis of their reproductive phenology on national territory and the size of temporarily present contingents. Of the 551 species present regularly or seasonally on Italian territory, 149 (27.0%) are in the initial indicative list of conservation priorities.

Red List categories application criteria national classification of exinction risk global conservation priorities in national distributions Italian terrestrial vertebrates Red List 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amori, G., Angelici, F.M., Frugis, S., Gandolfi, G., Groppali, R., Lanza, B., Relini, G. and Vicini, G. (1993) Checklist delle Specie della Fauna Italiana. Bologna: Calderini.Google Scholar
  2. Avery, M., Wingfield Gibbons, D., Porter, R., Tew, T., Turcker, G. and Williams, G. (1995) Re-vising the British Red Data List for Birds: the biological basis of UK conservation priorities. Ibis 137, 232–9.Google Scholar
  3. Boitani, L., Corsi, F., Angelici, F.M., Penteriani, V. and Pinchera F. (1993) Banca Dati della Fauna Terrestre Italiana. Roma: Ministero dell'Ambiente.Google Scholar
  4. Brichetti P. and Cambi, D. (1982) Osservazioni sulla lista rossa degli uccelli italiani. Avocetta 6, 201–3.Google Scholar
  5. Bruno, S. (1983) Lista rossa degli anfibi italiani. Riv. Piem. Storia Nat. 4, 5–48.Google Scholar
  6. Bruno, S. (1986) Tartarughe e Sauri d'Italia. Firenze: Giunti Martello.Google Scholar
  7. Burton, J.A. (1984) A bibliography of red data books. Oryx 18, 61–4.Google Scholar
  8. Collar, N.J., Crosby, M.J. and Stattersfield, A.J. (1994) Birds to Watch 2. Cambridge: Birdlife International.Google Scholar
  9. Corbett, K. (1989) Conservation of European Reptiles & Amphibians. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  10. Frugis, S. and Schenk, H. (1981) Red List of of Italian birds. Avocetta 5, 133–41.Google Scholar
  11. Gardenfors, U. (1996) Application of Red List Categories on a regional scale. In 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals (B. Groombridge, ed.). Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  12. Groombridge, B. (ed.) (1993) 1994 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  13. IUCN Species Survival Commission (1994) IUCN Red List Categories. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  14. Lanza, B. (1983) Guida per il Riconoscimento delle Specie Animali delle Acque Interne Italiane: Anfibi e Rettili. Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.Google Scholar
  15. Mace, G.M. (1993) The status of proposals to redefine the IUCN threatened species categories. In 1994 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals (B. Groombridge, ed.) pp. xlviii-liii. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  16. Mace, G.M. (1995) Classification of threatened species and its role in conservation planning. In Extinction Rates (J.H. Lawton and R.M. May, eds) pp. 198–213 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mace, G.M. and Lande, R. (1991) Assessing extintion threats: toward a re-evaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Cons. Biol. 5, 148–57.Google Scholar
  18. Mace, G.M. and Stuart, S.N. (1994) Draft IUCN Red List Categories, Version 2.2. Species 21–2, 13–24.Google Scholar
  19. Mace, G.M., Collar, N., Cooke, J., Gaston, K., Ginsberg, J., Leader Williams, N., Maunder, M. and Milner-Gulland, E.J. (1992) The development of new criteria for listing species on the IUCN red list. Species 19, 16–22.Google Scholar
  20. Meschini, E. and Frugis, S. (1993) Atlante Degli Uccelli Nidificanti in Italia. Bologna: Istituto Nazionale Fauna Selvatica.Google Scholar
  21. Ministero dell'Ambiente (1992) Relazione Sullo Stato dell'Ambiente. Roma: Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato.Google Scholar
  22. Pavan, M. (ed.) (1981) Distribuzione e Biologia di 22 Specie di Mammiferi in Italia. Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.Google Scholar
  23. Scott, P., Burton, J.A. and Fitter, R. (1987) Red Data Books: the historical background. In The Road of Extinction (R. Fitter and M. Fitter, eds) pp. 1–5. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, B.L. (1994) The reliability of using Population Viability Analysis for risk classification of species. Cons. Biol. 9, 551–8.Google Scholar
  25. Tucker, G.M. and Heath, M.F. (1994) Birds in Europe. Cambridge: Birdlife International.Google Scholar
  26. Wilson E.O. (1992) The Diversity of Life. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Pinchera
    • 1
  • Luigi Boitani
    • 1
  • Fabio Corsi
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento Biologia Animale e dell' UomoViale Universita` 32RomaItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Ecologia ApplicataRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations