Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate analysis of variation among Solanum commersonii (+) S. tuberosum somatic hybrids with different ploidy levels

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to integrate the outcomes of interspecific somatic fusion experiments in breeding schemes, it is important to understand factors involved in the variability observed among regenerated plants. With such a purpose in mind, a population of Solanum commersonii (+) S. tuberosum somatic hybrids was examined by means of discriminant and cluster analyses. Data were collected on 56 hybrids with different ploidies and on the two diploid parents grown in a greenhouse. The ploidy group was used as discrimination criterion. Three significant canonical variables were extracted by discriminant analysis; they were mainly correlated with the number of leaflets and stems, degree of flowering, plant height, and leaf length. After cluster analysis carried out with the significant canonical variables, parental and hybrid clones were grouped in 7 clusters. In the canonical space of reduced dimensions, patterns of morphological variation depended mainly on ploidy level and non-additive gene interactions. Hybrids were in general more similar to the cultivated than to the wild species, suggesting a good chance of fast introgression of useful traits from S. commersonii into the S. tuberosum genetic background.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Camussi, A., E. Ottaviano, T. Calinski & Z. Kaczmarek, 1985. Genetic distances based on quantitative traits. Genetics 111: 945–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardi, T., K.J. Puite, K.S. Ramulu, F. D'Ambrosio & L. Frusciante, 1993a. Production of somatic hybrids between frost tolerant Solanum commersonii and S. tuberosum: protoplast fusion, regeneration and isozyme analysis. Am Potato J 70: 753–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardi, T., F. D'Ambrosio, D. Consoli, K.J. Puite & K.S. Ramulu, 1993b. Production of somatic hybrids between frost tolerant Solanum commersonii and S. tuberosum: characterization of hybrid plants. Theor Appl Genet 87: 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Concilio, L., 1992. Morphological variability of potato haploids (2n = 2x = 24) extracted from a broadly genetic based tetraploid population. J Genet Breed 46: 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper-Bland, S., M.J. De Maine, H.E. Stewart, M.L.M.H. Fleming, M.S. Phillips & A. Kumar, 1996. Intraspecific somatic and sexual hybridisation between dihaploid lines of Solanum tuberosum L.: evaluation of morphological traits and resistance to late blight Phytophtora infestans (Mont.) de Bary in the foliage. Euphytica 90: 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B., 1974. Cluster Analysis. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, K.A. & A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, C.T., 1983. Somatic hybridization by plant protoplast fusion. In: I. Potrykus, C.T. Harms, A. Hinnen, R. Hutter, P.J. King & R.D. Shillito (Eds.), Protoplasts 1983 Lect. Proc., pp. 69–84. Birchauser Verlag.

  • Helgeson, J.P., 1989. Somatic hybridization of wild Solanum species with potato: a potential source of diversity for breeders. In: K.M. Louwes, H.A.J.M. Toussaint & L.M.W. Dellaert (Eds.), Parental Line Breeding and Selection in Potato Breeding, pp. 87–94. Pudoc, Wageningen.

  • Hosaka, K., Y. Ogihara, M. Matsubayashi & K. Tsunewaki, 1984. Phylogenetic relationship between the tuberous Solanum species as revealed by restriction endonuclease analysis of chloroplast DNA. Jpn J Genet 59: 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huaman, Z., J.T. Williams, W. Salhuana & L. Vincent, 1977. Descriptors for the Cultivated Potato. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.A. & D.W. Wichern, 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lössl, A., U. Frei & G. Wenzel, 1994. Interaction between cytoplasmic composition and yield parameters in somatic hybrids of S. tuberosum L. Theor Appl Genet 89: 873–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubayashi, M., 1991. Phylogenetic relationships in the potato and its related species. In: T. Tsuchiya & P.K. Gupta (Eds.), Chromosome Engineering in Plants: Genetics, Breeding, Evolution, Part B, pp. 93–118. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millam, S., L.A. Paine & G.R. Mackay, 1995. The integration of protoplast fusion-derived material into a potato breeding programme – a review of progress and problems. Euphytica 85: 451–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehu, E., R.D. Veilleux & K.H. Hilu, 1987. Cluster analysis of anther-derived plants of Solanum phureja (Solanaceae) based on morphological characteristics. Amer J Bot 74: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehu, E., A. Karp, K. Moore, S. Steele, R. Dunckley & M.G.K. Jones, 1989. Molecular, cytogenetic and morphological characterization of somatic hybrids of dihaploid Solanum tuberosum and diploid S. brevidens. Theor Appl Genet 78: 696–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiszner, J., A. Feher, O. Veisz, J. Sutka & D. Dudits, 1991. Characterization of morphological variation and cold resistance in interspecific somatic hybrids between potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and S. brevidens Phil. Euphytica 37: 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramulu, K.S., M. Devreux, G. Ancora & U. Laneri, 1976. Chimerism in Lycopersicum peruvianum plants regenerated from in vitro cultures of anthers and stem internodes. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg 76: 299–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramulu, K.S., P. Dijkhuis & R. Soest, 1989. Patterns of phenotypic and chromosome variation in plants derived from protoplast cultures of monohaploid, dihaploid and diploid genotypes and in somatic hybrids of potato. Plant Sci 60: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, R.F. & W. Handro, 1983. Morphological patterns in Petunia hybrida plants regenerated from tissue cultures and differing by their ploidy. Theor Appl Genet 66: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A., 1976. Some applications of numerical taxonomy to plant breeding. Z Pflanzenzüchtg 76: 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. & P.H.A. Sneath, 1963. Principles of numerical taxonomy. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.

  • Spooner, D.M. & J.B. Bamberg, 1994. Potato genetic resources: sources of genetics and systematics. Am Potato J 71: 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, G.C.C. & H. De Jong, 1980. Multivariate analyses of potato hybrids: I. Discrimination between tetraploid-diploid hybrid families and their relationship to cultivars. Can J Genet Cytol 22: 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, G.C.C. & T.R. Tarn, 1980. Multivariate analyses of potato hybrids: II: Discrimination between tuberosum-andigena hybrid families and their relationship to their parents. Can J Genet Cytol 22: 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uijtewaal, B.A., E. Jacobsen & J.G. Th. Hermsen, 1987. Morphology and vigour of monohaploid potato clones, their corresponding homozygous diploids and tetraploids and their heterozygous diploid parents. Euphytica 36: 745–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waara, S. & K. Glimelius, 1995. The potential of somatic hybridization in crop breeding. Euphytica 85: 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, K., S.J. Peloquin & M. Endo, 1991. Genetic significance of mode of polyploidization: somatic doubling or 2n gametes? Genome 34: 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L., M.A. Hill & E. Vang, 1992. SYSTAT: Statistics, Version 5.2 Edition. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardi, T. Multivariate analysis of variation among Solanum commersonii (+) S. tuberosum somatic hybrids with different ploidy levels. Euphytica 99, 35–41 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018361016968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018361016968

Navigation