Skip to main content
Log in

Legislating from both sides of the aisle: Information and the value of bipartisan consensus

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper motivates bipartisanship through a formal model in which committee members are assumed to possess policy expertise. Its central findings are: 1) bipartisan support for legislation is more informative than partisan support; 2) bipartisanship is preferred when the uncertainty surrounding outcomes is large and partisan policy differences are small; 3) “minority party gatekeeping” is possible when minority party members refuse to endorse majority party proposals; and 4) legislators with extreme preferences need minority party support to pass legislation. An equilibrium selection criterion is also introduced and applied to the model to predict under what conditions the majority party will seek bipartisan support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Epstein, D. Legislating from both sides of the aisle: Information and the value of bipartisan consensus. Public Choice 101, 1–22 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018348910337

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018348910337

Keywords

Navigation