Skip to main content
Log in

Breeding for yield and quality in durum wheat

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three populations of an intervarietal durum wheat cross IWP5308/PDW208, F5, F5BIP1 (population derived after intermating in F2) and F5BIP2 (population derived after intermating in BIPF1), were evaluated under three different agronomic environments for mean performance and stability of genotypes for grain yield, yield components and protein content. Though the biparental progenies indicated a higher mean performance, they did not differ significantly from progenies of the pedigree method for almost all characters. The biparental progenies, however, produced a higher number of stable genotypes for grain yield per plant, grains per ear and protein content. The F5 population had a higher number of stable genotypes for 1000 grain weight and number of tillers per plant. The BIP progenies also had a higher number of genotypes with above average mean performance, and many were significantly higher than the checks WH896 and WH542, compared with F5 progenies. Hence, in spite of high G x E interactions, the use of cycles of biparental mating and selection of top yielding lines on the basis of yield components can enable selection of stable genotypes with high protein content. Number of tillers per plant and 1000 grain weight were the yield component characters which made maximum contribution to phenotypic stability of the genotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chander, S., R.B. Srivastava & M. Yunus, 1993. Impact of intermating on population mean and genetic advance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell). Cereal Res Comm 21: 201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A.B., 1979. Breeding methodology for autogamous crops. Indian J Genet 39: 567–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbertay, M.& I. Demir, 1985. Studies on the inheritance of mealy endosperm and selected agronomic traits in four crosses of durum wheat. Ege Universiteti Ziraat Fakultesi Dergisi 21(2): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecetti, L.; G. Boggini & J. Gorham, 1994. Performance of durum wheat landraces in a Mediterranean environment (eastern Sicily). Euphytica 80: 191–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J.M. & J.L. Jinks, 1968. Environmental components of variability. VI. Diallel sets of crosses. Heredity 23: 339–356.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saini, D.P. & P.L. Gautam, 1990. Notes on G x E analysis in segregating populations of durum wheat. Indian J Genet 50: 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S.K., 1995. Component selection in selfed and intermated populations for the improvement of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Ph.D. thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simane, B., P.C. Struik, M.M. Nachit & J.M. Peacock, 1993. Ontogenetic analysis of yield components and yield stability of durum wheat in water limited environments. Euphytica 71: 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R.B., R.S. Paroda & S.K. Sethi, 1993. Effectiveness of commonly used mating systems and methods of generation advance in wheat - A retrospect. Pl Breed Abst 63(12): 1613–1619.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verma, S., Yunus, M. & Sethi, S. Breeding for yield and quality in durum wheat. Euphytica 100, 15–18 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018335402010

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018335402010

Navigation