Skip to main content
Log in

Direct and indirect selection for drought tolerance in alien tetraploid wheat x durum wheat crosses

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After the evaluation of numerous accessions of primitive wheats for yield components and morphophysiological traits related to drought tolerance (e.g., maintenance of high relative water content, RWC; photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence, qQ; and chlorophyll loss, chl, under moisture stress conditions), several accessions belonging to three species (Triticum dicoccum, T. polonicum, and T. carthlicum) were crossed with the improved durum wheat varieties Cham 1 and Om Rabi 5. A direct selection (F2 progeny) for yield and an indirect physiological trait were applied on interspecific T. durum x T. dicoccum, T. durum x T. polonicum, and T. durum x T. carthlicum populations. Divergent selection was applied to validate the possible use of morphophysiological traits (root parameters, RWC, photochemical quenching, proline content, and carbon isotope discrimination) in selection, and to evaluate the resulting effects on yield. Heritability and selection response of these traits has been evaluated, and the impact of divergent selection for morphological and agronomic characters was studied under field conditions. The divergent populations were evaluated under different environmental conditions in France, Syria, and Yemen. Selection for morphophysiological traits related to moisture stress, such as root parameters, RWC and carbon isotope discrimination was possible due to high h2 values and effective, resulting in high genetic gains. However, the effect of selection for these traits on yield stability needs to be further studied. Furthermore, a modified bulk method (F2 'progeny method') was developed. Direct selection for grain yield per plant in F2 was carried out and yield per line in F3 was evaluated under contrasting environmental conditions in France, Syria, and Tunisia. Results revealed that some F3 lines were higher yielding than the improved durum wheat varieties Cham 1 and Om Rabi 5 under both stressed (Aleppo) and favourable (Montpellier) environmental conditions. Lines were evaluated in preliminary yield trials at Montpellier (France), Aleppo (Syria), and Constantine (Algeria). Results indicated that the use of related species combined with the use of the modified bulk breeding method is promising not only for increasing durum wheat yield in drought prone environments, but also for improving durum wheat yield stability across contrasting environments. Results of both breeding strategies are presented, and the potential advantages of using related tetraploid species in durum wheat breeding for drought tolerance are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, E. & S. Ceccarelli, 1989. Role of a physiologist-breeder in a breeding program for drought resistance conditions. In: F.W.G. Baker (Ed.), Drought Resistance in Cereals, pp. 117–139.

  • Acevedo, E., 1987. Assessing crop and plant attributes for cereal improvement in water-limited Mediterranean environment. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds.), Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals, pp. 303–320. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Al Hakimi, A. & P. Monneveux, 1993a. Variation of some morphophysiological traits of drought tolerance in tetraploid wheats. In: A.B. Damania (Ed.), Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement, pp. 199–216. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Al Hakimi, A. & P. Monneveux, 1993b. Caractère d';enracinement et capacité de maintien de la turgescence chez les espèces primitives tétraplo'ides de blé: Utilisation de ces caractères pour l'amélioration génétique de la tolérance à la sécheresse chez le blé dur. In: P. Monneveux & M. Ben Salem (Eds.), Tolerance a la sécheresse des céreales en zone méditerranéenne. Diversité génétique et amélioration variétale, 1992, pp. 321–339. Les Colloques, No. 64. INRA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Dib, T., P. Monneveux & J.L. Araus, 1990. Breeding durum wheat for drought tolerance. Analytical, synthetical approaches, and their connections. In: Wheat Breeding. Prospects and Future Approaches, pp. 224–240. Agricultural Academy Bulgaria, General Toshevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Dib, T. & P. Monneveux, 1992. Adaptation à la sécheresse et notion d'ideotype chez le blé dur.I.caractères-morphologiques d'enracinement. Agronomie 12: 371–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenta-Soto, J., T.T Chang, G.C. Loresto & J.C. O'Toole, 1983. Genetic analysis of root characters in rice. SABRO J. 15: 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R.B., 1987. Some crop characteristics of wheat and their influence on yield and water use. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds.), Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals, pp. 321–336. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Barrs, H., 1968. Determination of water deficit in plant tissues. In: T.T. Kozolwski (Ed.), Water Deficit and Plant growth, pp. 235–368. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benlaribi, M., P. Monneveux & P. Grignac, 1990. Etude des caractères d'enracinement et de leur rôle dans l'adaptation au déficit hydrique chez le blé dur (T. durum Desf.). Agronomie 10: 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. C.R.C. Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. 223 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeuf, F., 1936. Les bases scientifiques de l'amelioration des plantes (Biologie, Genetique, Ecologie, Biometrie, Statistique). Encyclopedie scientifique. Le Chevalier.

  • Claesson, L., M. Koitimaki & R. Von Bothmer, 1990. Crossability and chromosome pairing in some interspecific Triticum hybrids. Hereditas 112: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J.M. & T.F. Townley-Smith, 1984. Screening and selection techniques for improving drought resistance. In: P.B. Vose & S.G. Blixt (Eds.), Crop Breeding: A Contemporary Basis, pp. 137–162. Oxford, UK.

  • Clarke, J.M., 1987. Use of physiological and morphological traits in breeding programmes to improve drought resistance of cereals. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds.), Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals, pp. 171–189. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Clarke, J.M., 1992. Wheats for dry environments. In: S. Rajaram, E.E. Saari & G.P. Hettel (Eds.), Durum Wheats: Challenges and Opportunities, pp. 133–148. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, L.G.L., 1957. Bulk and pedigree methods in wheat breeding. Wheat Information Service. Biol Lab, Kyoto University, Japan 5: 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deghais, M., 1993. Sélection de variétes de blé pour la tolérance à la sécheresse: effet de trois méthodes de sélection sur la hauteur de la paille, la précocité de l'epiaison, le rendement biologique et L'indice de recolte. In: P. Monneveux & M. Ben Salem (Eds.), Tolérance à la sécheresse des céreales en zone méditerranéenne. Diversité génétique et amélioration variétale, 1992, pp. 343–350. Les Colloques, No. 64. INRA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derera, N.F., D.R. Marshall & N.L. Balaam, 1969. Genetic varia294 bility in root development in relation to drought tolerance in spring wheats. Exp Agric 5: 327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekayanake, I.J., J.C. O'Toole, D.P. Garrity & T.M. Masajo, 1985. Inheritance of root characters and their relations to drought resistance in rice. Crop Sci 25: 927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, R.I. & J.E. Schultz, 1984. Water-use efficiency in a Mediterranean-type environment. Aust J Agric Res 35: 743–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grignac, P., J. Poux & A. Thomas, 1978. Comparaison de differentes méthodes de sélection utilisées pour l'amélioration des variétes de blé. Ann Am des Plantes 28:, 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, N.V., M.L. Martini & S. Harland, 1940. A study of methods in barley breeding. USDA Tech Bull 720: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J.B., 1937. The mass-pedigree method in the hybridisation improvement of cereals. J Am Soc Agron 37: 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, E.A., 1974. Phenotype and drought tolerance in wheat. Agric Meteor 14: 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jana, S.K. & E.T. Thomas, 1975. Evaluation of the population breeding method in the improvement of barley. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Barley Genetic Symposium, pp.750–760.

  • MacKey, J., 1979. Wheat domestication as shoot:root interrelation process. In: S. Ramanujam (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, pp. 875–890.

  • Marshall, D.R., 1987. Australian plant breeding strategies for rainfed areas. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds.), Drought tolerance in Winter Cereals, pp. 89–99. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Monneveux, P., 1991. Quelles strategies pour l'amélioration génétique de la tolérance au deficit hydrique des céreales d'hiver?. In: N. Chalbi & Y. Demarly (Eds.), L'amélioration des plantes pour l'adaptation aux milieux arides, pp. 165–186. AUPELF-UREF.

  • Morgan, J.M., 1980. Differences in adaptation to water stress within crop species. In: N.C. Turner & P.J.C. Kramer (Eds.), Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress, pp, 369–382. Wiley Inter Science, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J.M. & A.G. Condon, 1986. Water use, grain yield and osmoregulation in wheat. Aust J of Plant Physiol 13: 523–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachit, M.M., H. Ketata & S.K. Yau, 1988. Breeding durum wheat for stress environments of the Mediterranean region. In: G. Wittmer (Ed.), The future of cereals for human feeding and development of biotechnological research. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Durum Wheat, pp. 297–304.

  • Nachit, M.M & A. Ouassou, 19SS. Association of yield potential, drought tolerance and stability of yield in Triticum turgidum var. durum. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, pp. 867–870. Institute of Plant Science Research, Cambridge.

  • Ortiz-Ferrara, G., 1980. A comparison of four methods of selection for improvement of grain yield in winter by spring wheat crosses (Triticum aestivum L.), Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University.

  • Osmanzai, M., S. Rajaram & E.B. Knapp, 1987. Breeding for moisture-stressed areas. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds.), Drought tolerance in Winter Cereals, pp. 151–161. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Palmer, T.P., 1952. Population and selection studies in a Triticum cross. Heredity 6: 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rascio, A., G. Sorrentino, M.C. Cedola, D. Pastore & G. Wittmer, 1987. Osmotic and elastic adjustment of durum wheat leaves under drought stress conditions. Genet Agr 42: 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard, C. & V. Ndayshimie, 1982. Etude des relations hydriques chez Coffea arabica L. Comparaison de la presse à membrane et de la chambre à pression pour la mesure du potentiel hydrique foliaire. Café, Cacao: 26: 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.A. & J.B. Passioura, 1981. Seminal root morphology and water use of wheat. II. Genetic variation. Crop Sci 21: 253–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.A., 1989. Breeding for drought resistance. Physiological approaches. In: F. W.G. Baker (Ed.), Drought Resistance in Cereals, pp. 65–79.

  • Robertson, B.M., A.E. Hall & K.W. Foster, 1985. A field technique for screening for genotypic differences in root growth. Crop Sci 25: 1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseille, A.A. & J. Hamblin, 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Sci 21: 943–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, D.F., E.N. Larter & J.P. Gustafson, 1978. A comparison of early generation (F3) yield testing and pedigree selection methods in triticale. Crop Sci 13: 673–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonfeld, M.P., J.C. Richard, B.P. Carver & N.W. Mornhi, 1988. Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci 28: 526–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.L., 1987. A review of plant-breeding strategies for rainfed areas. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds.), Drought tolerance in Winter Cereals, pp. 79–87. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Taylor, H.M. & A. Yamauchi, 1991. Opportunities and problems in manipulating cereal root systems. In: E. Acevedo, A.P. Conesa, P. Monneveux & J.P. Srivastava (Eds.), Physiology-Breeding of Winter Cereals for Stressed Environments, pp. 369–390. Les Colloques No. 55. INRA, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truong, B. & P. Beunard, 1978. Etude de la croissance racinaire de six variétes de riz pluvial en culture aéroponique. Agron Trop 33: 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, W.D., N.H. Scott, A.R. Klatt & S. Rajaram, 1980. Performance of CIMMYT wheat germplasm in optimum and suboptimum production environments. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Wheat Conference, pp. 5–29.

  • Zobel, R.W., 1983. Crop manipulation for efficient use of water: constraints and potential techniques in breeding for efficient water use. In: H.M. Taylor, W.R. Jordan & T.R Sinclair (Eds.), Limitations to Efficient Water Use, pp. 381–392.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al Hakimi, A., Monneveaux, P. & Nachit, M. Direct and indirect selection for drought tolerance in alien tetraploid wheat x durum wheat crosses. Euphytica 100, 287–294 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018328911946

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018328911946

Keywords

Navigation