Skip to main content
Log in

Colonial legacies and economic growth

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much of the work on colonialism has been theoretical or anecdotal. In this paper, I close the gap between the literature on development and new growth theory by testing the effect of colonization on subsequent growth and development. In a sample of 63 ex-colonial states from 1961-1990, I find that colonies that were held for longer periods of time than other countries tend to perform better, on average, after independence. Finally, I show that the level of education at the time of independence can help to explain much of the development gap between the former British and French colonies in Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R.J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics106(2): 407–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertocchi, A. and Canova, F. (1996). Did colonization matter for growth? An empirical exploration into the historical causes of Africa's underdevelopment. Unpublished.

  • Brading, D.A. (1971). Miners and merchants in Bourbon Mexico: 1763–1810. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, E.M. (1972). The French presence in black Africa. Washington, DC: Black Orpheus Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowrick, S. and Nguyen, D.T. (1989). OECD comparative economic growth 1950–85: Catchup and convergence. American Economic Review79: 1010–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R.A. (1981). Why isn't the whole world developed? Journal of Economic History. 1: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetter, B. (1979). Colonial rule in Africa: Readings from primary sources. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieldhouse, D.K. (1966). The colonial empires from the 18th century. New York: Dell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman,M. (1977). Inflation and unemployment. Journal of Political Economy 85: 451–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman,M. (1992).Do old fallacies ever die? Journal of Economic Literature 30: 2129–2132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K.B. and Tullock, G. (1989). An empirical analysis of crossnational economic growth, 1951–80. Journal of Monetary Economics24: 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, R. (1997). The effect of religion on economic development: A cross national study of 63 former colonies. Kyklos(vol. 50, no.1, 47–62).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, J.R. (1989). Education, economic development, and technology transfer: A colonial test. Journal of Economic History4: 939–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. (1985). Underdevelopment is a state of mind: The Latin American case. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, and University Press of America, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1944). The road of serfdom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.P. (1986). Learning to be marginal: Schooling in interwar FrenchWestAfrica. Journal of Asian and African Studies21: 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. and Flieger,W.C. (1990).World population growth and aging: Demographic trends in the late twentieth century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormendi, R.C. and Meguire, P.G. (1985). Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Crosscountry evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics16: 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.M. (1967). Colonial development and good government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. and Makin, J.C. (1980). Inflation uncertainty and the Phillips curve: Some empirical evidence. American Economic Review70: 1022–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, A. (1933). Contemporary survey of educational aims and methods in India and Africa. Africa6: 172–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, C.M. (Ed.). (1950). Principles and methods of colonial administration. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B.R. (1982). International historical statistics: Africa and Asia. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullineaux, D. (1980). Unemployment, industrial production and inflation uncertainty. Review of Economics and Statistics62: 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. (1993a). Empirical crosssection dynamics in economic growth. European EconomicReview37: 426–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. (1993b). Galton's fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics95: 427–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, S. (1991). Longrun policy analysis and longrun growth. Journal of Political Economy99: 500–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1987). Crazy explanations for the productivity slowdown. In S. Fischer (Ed.), NBER macroeconomics annual, 163–202. Cambridge, Massachusets: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R. and Heston, A. (1991). The Penn World Table (Mark 5). An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950–1988, Quarterly Journal of Economics106(2): 327–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Mehden, F.R. (1969). Politics of the developing nation. Englewood Cliffs: PrenticeHall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieschhoff, H.A. (1944). Colonial policies in Africa.Westport, CT: Negro Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grier, R.M. Colonial legacies and economic growth. Public Choice 98, 317–335 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018322908007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018322908007

Keywords

Navigation