Skip to main content
Log in

Voting, Collective Action, and Liberalisation in Latin America: The Rise and Fall of the Hillinger Paradox

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chile's economic and political evolution after the 1982–83 financial crisis has been offered as a model for the rest of Latin America. This paper interprets the 1973 military coup, and national recovery during the 1980s and 1990s, in terms of the presence and absence, respectively, of the Hillinger (1971) paradox. The paradox arises when democratic voting on platforms consisting of several issues leads to majority support for a platform, itself consisting of issues, none of which is supported by the majority. In the early 1970s, a particular expression of the Hillinger paradox led Chile to the verge of a bloody civil war, and to a prolonged military dictatorship. In the mid 1980s, an important policy question, that of differentiated industrial protection versus free trade, was solved by a stable compromise in favour of the latter. This avoided the Hillinger paradox and eventually made electoral politics possible again.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature 35(3): 1320–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J.R. (1976). Foreign trade regimes and economic development: Chile. New York: NBER and Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, B.P., Dornbusch, R. and Laban, R. (Eds.) (1994). The Chilean economy: Policy lessons and challenges. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Monitor International (1997). Chile 1997: In a class of its own. London: BMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S. and Sater, W.F. (1996). A history of Chile, 1808–1994. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, P. and Valenzuela, A. (1991). A nation of enemies: Chile under Pinochet. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbo, V. (1997), Trade reform and uniform import tariffs: The Chilean experience. American Economic Review 87(2): 73–77(AEA Papers and Proceedings).

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Cuadra, S. and Hachette, D. (1991).Chile. In Papageorgiou, D., Michaely, M. and Choksi, A.M. (Eds.). Liberalising foreign trade, Volume 1, 287–362. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pineres, S.A.G. and Ferrantino, M. (1997). Export diversification and structural dynamics in the growth process: The case of Chile. Journal of Development Economics 52: 375–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vylder, S. (1976). Allende's Chile: The political economy of the rise and fall of the Unidad Popular. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. and Edwards, A.C. (1987). Monetarism and liberalisation: The Chilean experiment. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J.P. (1986). The National Unified School in Allende's Chile. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. and Rodrik, D. (1991). Resistance to reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. American Economic Review 81(5): 1146–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ffrench-Davis, R. (1973). Politicas economicas en Chile 1952–1970. Santiago: CEPLANNueva Universidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, A. (1988), Los Economistas y el Presidente Pinochet. Santiago: Zig-Zag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachette, D. and Luders, R. (1992). La privatizacion en Chile. San Francisco: CINDE-ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L.E. (1997). The Pan-American dream. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillinger, C. (1971). Voting on issues and on platforms. Behavioural Science 16: 564–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojman, D.E. (1990a). Neoliberal agriculture in rural Chile. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojman. D.E. (Ed.) (1990b). Chile after Pinochet: Aylwin's christian democrat economic policies for the nineties. Bulletin of Latin American Research 9(1): 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojman, D.E. (1993a). Chile: The political economy of development and democracy in the 1990s. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojman, D.E. (Ed.) (1993b). Change in the Chilean countryside: From Pinochet to Aylwin and beyond. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojman, D.E. (1994). The political economy of recent conversions to market economics in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies 26(1): 191–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojman, D.E. (1995a). Educational standards and ideological attitudes in a free-market, openeconomy development model. In Hojman, D.E. (Ed.). Neoliberalism with a human face? The politics and economics of the Chilean model, 151–170. Liverpool: Institute of Latin American Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojman, D.E. (1995b). Chile under Frei (again): The first Latin American tiger – or just another cat?. Bulletin of Latin American Research 14(2): 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrain, F. and Meller, P. (1991). The socialist-populist Chilean experience: 1970–1973. In Dornbusch, R. and Edwards, S. (Eds.). The macroeconomics of populism in Latin America, 175–214. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamalakis, M. (1965). Public policy and sectoral development, In Mamalakis, M. and Reynolds, C.W. (Eds.). Essays on the Chilean economy, 3–200. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamalakis, M. (1976). The growth and structure of the Chilean economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero, C. (1997). La revolucion empresarial Chilena. Santiago: Dolmen-CIEPLAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T.H. (1974). Multinational corporations and the politics of dependence: Copper in Chile. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D.W. and Taylor, M. (1970). The analysis of political cleavages. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P.C. and Araujo, K. LaF. (1997). The capitalist revolution in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. (1996). The state and capital in Chile. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, B. (1978). Class conflict and economic development in Chile, 1958–1973. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdes, J.G. (1989). La escuela de Chicago: Operacion Chile. Buenos Aires: Grupo Zeta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, J.S. and Scully, T.R. (1997). Electoral choices and the party system in Chile: Continuities and changes at the recovery of democracy. Comparative Politics 29(4): 511–427.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakravarty, S.P., Hojman, D.E. Voting, Collective Action, and Liberalisation in Latin America: The Rise and Fall of the Hillinger Paradox. Public Choice 101, 215–233 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018319919728

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018319919728

Keywords

Navigation