Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 145–160 | Cite as

Characterizing Managerial Skill and Technical Efficiency in a Fishery

  • James Kirkley
  • Dale Squires
  • Ivar E. Strand


Researchers have long recognized that entrepreneurial or managerial skill is a major determinant of productivity or reason why production among firms varies. Yet, except for a few studies, differences in productivity and output levels are usually attributed to plant configuration or scale. More important, there appears to have been few attempts to relate technical efficiency to managerial skill. Utilizing a stochastic production frontier, we examine the relationship between technical efficiency and characteristics of skill such as experience and education in a fishery. Although we can not determine threshold or essential levels of experience and education, substitution possibilities are found to exist between years of experience and education levels. Additional analysis of efficiency for two captains of the same background and experience reveals that additional characteristics need to be considered in the examination of skipper skill or the “good-captain” hypothesis.

Technical efficiency managerial skill and fisheries 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acheson, J. (1975). “The Lobster Fiefs: Economic and Ecological Effects of Territoriality in the Maine Lobster Industry.” Human Ecology 3, 183–207.Google Scholar
  2. Aigner, D. J., C. A. K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. (1977). “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6, 21–37.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L. G. (1989). “Conceptual Constructs for Practical ITQ Management Polices.” In Neher, P.A. Arnason, and N. Mollett (eds.), Rights Based Fishing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1988). “Prediction of Firm-Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalized Frontier Production function and Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 38, 387–399.Google Scholar
  5. Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1992). “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency, and Panel Data.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 153–169.Google Scholar
  6. Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1993). “A Stochastic Frontier Production Function Incorporating a Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects.” Working Papers in Econometrics and Applied Statistics, No. 69, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, pp. 22.Google Scholar
  7. Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1995). “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data.” Empirical Economics 20, 325–332.Google Scholar
  8. Bauer, P.W. (1990). “Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Frontiers.” Journal of Econometrics 12, 24–42.Google Scholar
  9. Bhattacharyya, A., T. R. Harris, R. Narayana, and K. Raffiee. (1995). “Technical Efficiency of Rural Water Utilities.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20(2), 373–391.Google Scholar
  10. Bjorndal, T. (1987). “Production Economics and Optimal Stock Size in a North Atlantic Fishery.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 89, 145–164.Google Scholar
  11. Bjorndal, T. (1989). “Production in a Schooling Fishery: The Case of the North Sea Herring Fishery.” Land Economics 65, 49–56.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, H. F. (1991). “Estimating the Elasticity of Substitution between Restricted and Unrestricted Inputs in a Regulated Fishery: A Probit Approach.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 262–274.Google Scholar
  13. Carlson, E. (1975). “The Measurement of Relative Fishing Power Using Cross-Section Production Functions.” In J. Pope (ed.), Rapports et Proces-Vervaux des Reunions du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 168, 99–102.Google Scholar
  14. Coelli, T. (1994). “A Guide to Frontier Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation.” Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Coelli, T. (1995). “Estimators and Hypothesis Tests for a Stochastic Frontier Function: A Monte Carlo Analysis.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 6, 247–268.Google Scholar
  16. Comitini, S., and D. S. Huang. (1967). “A Study of Production and Factor Shares in the Halibut Fishing Industry.” Journal of Political Economy 75, 366–372.Google Scholar
  17. Dickie, L. M. (1955). “Fluctuations in Abundance of the Giant Sea Scallop, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin), in the Digby Area of the Bay of Fundy.” Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 12, 797–854.Google Scholar
  18. Hannesson, R. (1983). “Bioeconomic Production Function in Fisheries: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40, 968–982.Google Scholar
  19. Hilborn, R., and M. Ledbetter. (1985). “Determinants of Catching Power in the British Columbia Salmon Purse Seine Fleet.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40, 968–982.Google Scholar
  20. Houghton, R. (1977). “The Fishing Power of Trawlers in the Western English Channel between 1965 and 1968.” Journal du Conseil and the Exploration of the Sea 37, 130–136.Google Scholar
  21. Huppert, D. D. (1989). Comments on R. Bruce Rettig's “Is Fishery Management at a Turning Point? Reflections on the Evolution of Rights Based Fishing.” In P. A. Neher, R. Arnason, and N. Mollett (eds.), Rights Based Fishing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Jondrow, J., K. Lovell, I. Materov, and P. Schmidt. (1982). “On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Model.” Journal of Econometrics 19(2/3), 233–238.Google Scholar
  23. Kalirajan, K., and J. Flinn. (1983). “The Measurement of Farm-Specific Technical Efficiency.” Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics 2, 167–180.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, H. Y. (1992). “The Translog Production Function and Variable Returns to Scale.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74, 546–552.Google Scholar
  25. Kirkley, J. E., and W. D. DuPaul. (1989). “Science, Commercial Practices, and the Determination of Fishery Regulations.” Journal of Shellfish Research 8, 139–149.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, L. F. (1983). “A Test for Distributional Assumptions for the Stochastic Frontier Functions.” Journal of Econometrics 22, 245–268.Google Scholar
  27. Meeusen, W., and van den Broeck. (1977). “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error.” International Economic Review? 18, 435–444. 109–122.Google Scholar
  28. Mundlak, Y. (1961). “Empirical Production Functions Free of Management Bias.” Journal of Farm Economics 43, 44–56.Google Scholar
  29. Noetzel, B. G., and V. J. Norton. (1969). Costs and Earnings in the Boston Large-Trawler Fleet. Bulletin 400, University of Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  30. Palsson, G., and P. Durrenberger. (1982). “To Dream of Fish: The Causes of Icelandic Skippers' Fishing Success.” Journal of Anthropological Research 38, 227–242.Google Scholar
  31. Pollak, R. A., and T. J. Wales. (1987). “Specification and Estimation of Nonseparable Two-Stage Technologies: the Leontief CES and the Cobb-Douglas CES.” Journal of Political Economy 95, 311–333.Google Scholar
  32. Richards, L. J., and J. T. Schnute. (1986). “An Experimental and Statistical Approach to the Question: Is CPUE an Index of Abundance?” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43, 1214–1227.Google Scholar
  33. Rothschild, B. (1972). “An Exposition on the Definition of Fishing Effort.” Fishery Bulletin 70, 671–679.Google Scholar
  34. Schmidt, P., and T-F Lin. (1984). “Simple Tests of Alternative Specifications in Stochastic Frontier Models.” Journal of Econometrics 24, 349–361.Google Scholar
  35. Squires, D. (1987). “Fishing Effort: Its Testing, Specification and Internal Structure in Fisheries Economics and Management.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14, 268–282.Google Scholar
  36. Strand, I., J. Kirkley, and K. McConnell. (1981). “Economic Analysis and the Management of Atlantic Surf Clams.” In L. G. Anderson (ed.), Economic Analysis for Fisheries Management Plans. Ann Arbor Science.Google Scholar
  37. Thorlindsson, T. (1987). “The Skipper Effect in the Icelandic Herring Fishery.” Human Organization 47, 199–212.Google Scholar
  38. Waldman, D. (1982). “A Stationary Point for the Stochastic Frontier Likelihood.” Journal of Econometrics 18, 275–279.Google Scholar
  39. Zellner, A. J., J. Kmenta, and J. Dreze. (1966). “Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models.” Econometrica 34, 784–795.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Kirkley
    • 1
  • Dale Squires
    • 2
  • Ivar E. Strand
    • 3
  1. 1.College of William and Mary, School of Marine ScienceVirginia Institute of Marine ScienceGloucester Point
  2. 2.National Marine Fisheries ServiceSouthwest Fisheries Science CenterLa Jolla
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations