Skip to main content
Log in

Governmental failures in evaluating programs

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider a government that adopts a program, sees a noisy signal about its success, and decides whether to continue the program. Suppose further that the success of a program is greater if people think it will be continued. This paper considers outcomes when government cannot commit. We find that welfare can be higher when information is poor, that government should at times commit to continuing a program it believes had failed, and that a government which fears losing power may acquire either too much or too little information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, Alberto (1989). Politics and business cycles in industrial democracies. Economic Policy 8: 55–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, Alberto and Tabellini, Guido (1990). A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt. Review of Economic Studies 57: 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiman, Stanley and Demski, Joel S. (1980). Economically optimal performance evaluation and control systems. Journal of Accounting Research 18: 184–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, David P. and Besanko, David (1984). Regulation, asymmetric information, and auditing. Rand Journal of Economics 15: 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, Robert and Gordon, David (1983). A positive theory of monetary policy in a natural rate model. Journal of Political Economy 91: 589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Border, Kim C. and Sobel, Joel (1987). Samurai accountant: A theory of auditing and plunder. Review of Economic Studies 54: 525–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, Alex and Meltzer, Allan H. (1986). A positive theory of discretionary policy, the costs of democratic government, and the benefits of a constitution. Economic Inquiry 24: 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Thomas W. and Krehbiel, Keith (1990). The organization of informative committees by a rational legislature. American Journal of Political Science 34: 531–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, Amihai (1989). Politics and the choice of durability. American Economic Review 79: 1207–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Milton and Raviv, Artur (1979). Optimal incentive contracts with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory 20: 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, Bengt (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics Spring 10: 74–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanodia, Chandra S. (1985). Stochastic monitoring and moral hazard. Journal of Accounting Research 23: 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, Finn E. and Prescott, E.C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy 85: 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Tirole, Jean (1986). Using cost observations to regulate firms. Journal of Political Economy 94: 614–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, Cotton M. (1976). A theory of government enterprise. Journal of Political Economy 84(5): 1061–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, Mathew, Noll, Roger G. and Weingast, Barry R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, Mathew D., Noll, Roger J. and Weingast, Barry R. (1989). Structure and process, politics, and policy: Administrative arrangements for control of agencies. Virginia Law Review 75(2): 431–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, Mary, Viscusi, Kip and Zeckhauser, Richard (1984). Economic contests: Comparative reward schemes. Journal of Labor Economics 2: 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, Torsten (1988). Credibility of macroeconomic policy: An introduction and a broad survey. European Economic Review 32: 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, Jennifer F. and Wilde, Louis L. (1985). Income tax compliance in a principal-agent framework. Journal of Public Economics 26: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, Jennifer F. and Wilde, Louis L. (1988). A note on enforcement uncertainty and taxpayer compliance. Quarterly Journal of Economics 103: 793–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, Steven (1979). Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A. Michael and Zeckhauser, Richard (1971). Insurance, information and individual action. American Economic Review 61: 380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strotz, Robert (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economics Studies 23: 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, Guido and Alesina, Alberto (1990). Voting on the budget deficit. American Economic Review 80: 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glazer, A., Hassin, R. Governmental failures in evaluating programs. Public Choice 94, 105–115 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017987821453

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017987821453

Keywords

Navigation