Skip to main content
Log in

From Logos to Pathos in Social Psychology and Academic Argumentation: Reconciling Postmodernism and Positivism in a Sociology of Persuasion

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that one can empirically test, via positivist methods, the post-modern attack on positivist epistemologies: Postmodern perspectives hold Knowledge and Truth to be intersubjective, consensus-driven social constructions. But traditional scientific approaches to knowledge, exemplified here by the cognitive social psychology of persuasion, seem oblivious to this and continue to detach the study of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions from that of knowledge, facts, and reason. Abandoning these artificial distinctions in both epistemology and method would enable this social psychology, reconstituted as a Sociology of Persuasion, to contribute greatly to illuminating the processes of Truth and Knowledge construction in social interaction. Moreover, this would facilitate academic engagement in civic discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allison, P.: 1979, ‘Experimental Parapsychology as a Rejected Science’, in Roy Wallis (ed.), On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge, Sociological Review Monograph 27, 271–291.

  • Ashmore, M.: 1989, The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S.: 1990, ‘Reflection, Doubt, and the Place of Rhetoric in Postmodern Social Theory’, Sociological Theory 8, 232–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C.: 1932, Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and T. Luckmann: 1967, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday-Anchor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J.: 1987, ‘Rhetoric in Claims-Making: Constructing the Missing Children Problem’, Social Problems 34, 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D.: 1991, Knowledge and Social Imagery, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H.: 1981, ‘Emotional Mood and Memory’, American Psychologist 36, 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. H.: 1990, ‘Rhetoric, Textuality, and the Postmodern Trun in Sociological Theory’, Sociological Theory 8, 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. H.: 1989, Social Science as Civic Discourse: Essays on the Invention, Legitimation, and Uses of Social Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. H.: 1987, Social as Text: Essays on Rhetoric, Reason, and Reality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., W. Mischel and J. Schwartz: 1982, ‘Social Knowledges: Structure, Content, Use, and Abuse’, in Albert H. Hastorf and Alice M. Isen (eds.), Cognitive Social Psychology, Elsevier North-Holland, New York, 33–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S. and C. Stangor: 1987, ‘Attitudes and Attitude Change’, Annual Review of Psychology 38, 575–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. and T. Pinch: 1979, ‘The Construction of the Paranormal: Nothing Unscientific is Happening’, in Roy Wallis (ed.), On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge, Sociological Review Monography 27, 237–270.

  • Festinger, L.: 1957, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Evanston, Row, Peterson, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S.: 1988, Social Epistemology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furth, H.: 1987, Knowledge as Desire: An Essay on Freud and Piaget, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F.: Forthcoming, ‘Boundaries of Science’, in Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald Markle, Trevor Pinch and James Petersen (eds.), Handbook on Science, Technology and Society, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

  • Gieryn, T. F.: 1983, ‘Boundary-work and the Demaraction of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interest in Professional Ideologies of Scientists’, American Sociological Review 48, 781–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A.: 1990, The Rhetoric of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R.: 1987, ‘Affect Control Theory: Concepts and Models’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 13, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R.: 1986, ‘Modeling Symbolic Interaction’, in S. Lindenberg, J. S. Coleman, and S. Novak (eds.), Approaches to Social Theory, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R.: 1979, Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R.: 1977, ‘Social Action as the Control of Affect’, Behavioral Science 22, 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise D. R. and E. Lewis: 1988, Introduction to Interact, National Collegiate Software Clearinghouse, Raleigh, N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M.: 1990, Beliefs Based on Emotional Reception: Their Formation, Justification and Truth, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Jaggar, A. M.: 1989, ‘Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology’, Inquiry 32, 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, B.: 1992, ‘The Social Construction of Protest and Multiorganizational Fields’, in Aldon Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller (eds.), Frontiers of Social Movement Theory, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 77–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp, J. F.: In this volume, ‘Freedom and Responsibility in Constructing Public Life: Toward a Revised Ethic of Discourse’.

  • Kuhn, T.: 1970/1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, C.: 1989, Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility, 5e, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K.: 1936, Ideology and Utopia, Harcourt, Brace and Co. — Harvest Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. and R. B. Zajonc: 1985, ‘The Cognitive Perspective in Social Psychology’, in Lindsey Gradiner and Elliot Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (vol. 1), Random House, New York, 137–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClenon, J.: 1984, Deviant Science: The Case of Parapsychology, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, K.: 1957, Social Theory and Social Structure, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. and J. A. Holstein (eds): 1993, Constructionist Controversies: Issues in Social Problems Theory, Aldin de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. S., A. Megill, and D. N. McCloskey (eds.): 1987, The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacippo: 1986, Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. L.: 1986, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1991, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. L.: 1976, ‘On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic: Ten Years Later’, Central States Speech Journal.

  • Scott, R. L.: 1967, ‘On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic’, Central States Speech Journal 18, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, C. W., M. Sherif and R. E. Nebergall: 1965, Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-involvement Approach, W. B. Saunders and Co., Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. W. and J. I. Kitsuse (eds.): 1984, Studies in the Sociology of Social Problems, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J.: In this volume, ‘On a Different Ground: From Contests Between Monolgoues to Dialgoical Contest’.

  • Simons, H. W.: 1989, Rhetoric in the Human Sciences, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. and R. Benford: 1992, ‘Master Frames and Cycles of Protest’, in Aldon Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller (eds.), Frontiers of Social Movement Theory, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 133–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M. and J. I. Kitsuse: 1977, Constructing Social Problems, Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: [1958] 1964, The Uses of Argument, Camrbidge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, B.: 1984, ‘On the Primacy of Affect’, American Psychologist 39, 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, B.: 1980, ‘Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences’, American Psychologists 35, 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berbrier, M. From Logos to Pathos in Social Psychology and Academic Argumentation: Reconciling Postmodernism and Positivism in a Sociology of Persuasion. Argumentation 11, 35–50 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017982511497

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017982511497

Navigation