Skip to main content
Log in

Slowing monetary growth since 1984: A public choice explanation

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Until about 1984, the U.S. monetary base typically grew at an accelerating rate. Since then, that acceleration has stopped. Modern evidence suggests that the Federal Reserve responds to political pressure. We present empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that reduced monetary base growth reflects the fact that the political advantages of price inflation have been significantly reduced by the tax indexation provisions of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, R.K., Froyen, R. and Waud, R.N. (1980). Monetary reaction functions, consistent expectations, and the Burns era. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 12: 30-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Sachs, J. (1988). Political parties and the business cycle in the United States, Journal of Money Credit and Banking 20: 63-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1979). On the determination of the public debt. Journal of Political Economy 87(5): 940-971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (1987). Elections and the fed: Is there a political monetary cycle? American Journal of Political Science 31: 194-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, T. (1993). Congressional and Presidential influences on monetary policy, unpublished Working Paper. Ohio University Department of Economics.

  • Grier, K. (1987). Presidential elections and Federal Reserve policy: An empirical test, Southern Economic Journal 54: 475-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K. (1989). On the existence of a political monetary cycle, American Journal of Political Science 33: 376-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K. (1991). Congressional influence of U.S. monetary policy: An empirical test, Journal of Monetary Economics 28: 201-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handbook on the Economy Recovery Act of 1981. (1981). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

  • Havrilesky, T. (1993). The pressure on American monetary policy. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.R. and Vedder, R.K. (1992). Friedman tax cuts vs. Buchanan deficit reduction as the best way of constraining government. Economic Inquiry 30: 722-732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.R. and Vedder, R.K. (1995). The political economy of the peace dividend. Public Choice, forthcoming.

  • Mankiw, N.G. (1987). The optimal collection of seigniorage: Theory and evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics 20 (September): 327-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. and Tollison, R.D. (1981). Politicians, legislation, and the economy: An inquiry into the interest-group theory of government. Boston, The Hague, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1927). A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal 37: 47-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuerle, E.C. (1992). The tax decade: How taxes came to dominate the public agenda. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1989). Historical tables, Budget of United States Government: Fiscal year 1989. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caporale, T., Lee, D.R. & Vedder, R.K. Slowing monetary growth since 1984: A public choice explanation. Public Choice 91, 127–137 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017972803113

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017972803113

Keywords

Navigation