Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative Dispute Resolution and Employee Voice in Nonunion Employment: An Ethical Analysis of Organizational Due Process Procedures and Mechanisms -- The Case of the United States

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to integrate and analyze the research findings of previous studies dealing both directly and tangentially with the strategic ethical issues involved in alternative dispute resolution procedures and systems found in nonunion employment. Particular attention will be given to one of the most significant issues in this area at the operating and tactical level of individual companies: the procedural techniques with respect to the processing of the complaints and grievances of employees in nonunion companies and firms. The paper concludes with policy recommendations for managers and recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balfour, A.: 1984, 'Five Types of Non-Union Grievance Systems', Personnel 61, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambrick, J. J. and J. Speed, Grievance Procedures in Nonunionized Companies (National Industrial Conference Board, New York), Studies in Personnel Policy, No. 109, pp. 15–16.

  • Baxter, R. H. and E, Hunt: 1989, 'Alternative Dispute Resolution: Arbitration of Employment Claims', Employee Relations Law Journal 15, 187–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbeim, R.: 1980, Nonunion Complaint Systems: A Corporate Appraisal (The Conference Board, New York), pp. 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlander, G. W. and H. White: 1988, 'Building Bridges: Nonunion Employee Grievance Systems', Personnel 65, 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byars, L. L. and L. Rue: 1984, 'Discipline in Nonunionized Organizations', in Human Resource and Personnel Management (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois), p. 372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrington, D. J.: 1982, 'Grievance Procedures in Nonunion Organizations', Personnel Management: The Management of Human Resources (Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa), pp. 586–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, J. D.: 1984, 'Peer Review: The Emerging Successful Application', Employee Relations Law Journal 9, 659–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, R.: 1980, 'An Informal Way to Settle Office Disputes', Modern Office Procedures (June), 184.

  • Edelman, L. B.: 1990, 'Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace', American Journal of Sociology 95, 1401–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feliu, A. G.: 1987, 'Legal Consequences of Nonunion Dispute-Resolution Systems', Employee Relations Law Journal 13, 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florey, P.: 1985, 'A Growing Fringe Benefit: Arbitration of Nonunion Employee Grievances', Personnel Administrator 30, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, W.: 1994, Internal Company Investigations and the Employment Relationship (Quorum Books, Westport, CT), pp. 1–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorden, W. I.: 1988, 'Range of Employee Voice', Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 1, 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litrell, L. R.: 1982, 'Grievance Procedure and Arbitration in a Nonunion Environment: The Northrup Experience', in Arbitration Issues for the 1980s, Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators, Maui, Hawaii, May 4–8, 1981 (The Bureau of National Affairs 1982), pp. 35–42.

  • McCabe, D. M.: 1994, 'Non-Union Grievance Procedures: A Strategic Analysis of Organizational due Process', Employee Rights and Industrial Justice: Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations 28, 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M. and D. Lewin: 1992, 'Employee Voice: A Human Resource Management Perspective', California Management Review 34, 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M.: 1990, 'Corporate Nonunion Grievance Procedures: Open Door Policies — A Procedural Analysis', Labor Law Journal 41, 551–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M.: 1989, 'Corporate Nonunion Grievance Arbitration Systems: A Procedural Analysis', Labor Law Journal 40, 432–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M.: 1988, Corporate Nonunion Complaint Procedures and Systems: A Strategic Human Resources Management Analysis (Praeger, New York), pp. 1–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M.: 1988, 'Grievance Processing: Non-Union Setting — Peer Review Systems and Internal Corporate Tribunals: A Procedural Analysis', Labor Law Journal 34, 496–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, D. S.: 1993, Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques (Employment Policy Foundation, Washington, DC), pp. 23–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, R. B.: 1990, 'Ethical Considerations in Alternative Dispute Resolution', The Arbitration Journal, 15–280.

  • Peterson, R. B.: 1994, 'Organizational Governance and the Grievance Process: In Need of a New Model for Resolving Workplace Issues', Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 7, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. B. and D. McCabe: 1994, 'The Nonunion Grievance System in High Performing Firms', Labor Law Journal 45, 529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. B. and D. Lewin: 1990, 'The Nonunion Grievance Procedure: A Viable System of Due Process?', Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 3, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigors, P. and C. Myers: 1981, 'Complaints and Grievances' in Personnel Administration: A Point of View and a Method (McGraw-Hill, New York), p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reibstein, L.: 1986, 'More Firms Use Peer Review Panel to Resolve Employees' Grievances', The Wall Street Journal (3 December), sec. 2, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. P. and M. Baker: 1984, 'Are You Hearing Enough Employee Concerns', Harvard Business Review 62, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. G.: 1988, 'The Management Governance Theories of Justice and Liberty', Journal of Management 14, 277–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasini, J. and P. Houston: 1986, 'Letting Workers Help Handle Workers' Gripes', Business Week (15 September), 82.

  • Wachter, M. L.: 1987, 'Comment', in Arbitration 1986: Current and Expanding Roles, Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 2–6, 1986 (The Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. R. and S. Goldman: 1988, 'Avoiding Liability in Employee Handbooks', Employee Relations Law Journal 14, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCabe, D.M. Alternative Dispute Resolution and Employee Voice in Nonunion Employment: An Ethical Analysis of Organizational Due Process Procedures and Mechanisms -- The Case of the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 349–356 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017972218198

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017972218198

Keywords

Navigation