Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of Ethics Across Situations: A View Through Three Different Lenses

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examined three approaches for understanding perceptions of ethics: moral philosophies, cognitive moral development, and ethical value systems. First, the dimensionality of the moral philosophy approach was examined. Next, an attempt was made to integrate the models. Finally, each of the model's various components were used in a regression equation to isolate the best predictors of ethicality. Results indicated that the moral philosophies can be considered distinct entities, but the common underlying theme between the approaches was not as predicted. Also, individuals used a variety of approaches, not always the same ones, to determine the ethicalness of situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aupperle, W. F., A. B. Carroll and J. D. Hatfield: 1985, 'An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability', Academy of Management Journal 38, 446–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. and N. E. Bowie: 1979, Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A.: 1980, 'Bridging Moral Cognitions and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature', Psychological Bulletin 88, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G., D. Moberg and M. Velasquez: 1981, 'The Ethics of Organizational Politics', Academy of Management Review 6(3), 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., L. Kohlberg, J. Gibbs and M. Lieberman: 1983, 'A Longitudinal Study of Moral Development', Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 48 (1, 2), Series #200, 1–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T.: 1986, Business Ethics (Macmillan Publishing Company, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, V. and J. Gabriel: 1982, 'Principled Moral Thinking of Australian Adolescents: Sample Characteristics and f Correlates', Genetic Psychology Monographs 106, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, 'A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing', Journal of Marketing (Summer), 87–96.

  • Ford, R. C. and W. D. Richardson: 1993, The Relationship Between Individual Characteristics and Ethical Beliefs and Decision Making Behavior: A Review of the Empirical Literature (Presented at the Southern Management Association Meetings).

  • Gibbs, J. C. and K. F. Widaman: 1982, Social Intelligence: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, 'Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model', Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. and D. Sorbom: 1988, LISREL 7 (SPSSX Inc., Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969, 'Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Development Approach to Socialization', in D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1981, Essays on Moral Development. Volume 1: The Philosophy of Moral Development (Harper and Row, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance (Ballinger, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Musser, S. and E. Orke: 1992, A Basic Typology of Ethical Value Systems (Proceedings from the Council of Employees Rights and Responsibilities Conference, Miami, FL).

  • Rest, J.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M.: 1968, Beliefs, Attitudes and Values (Josey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M.: 1973, The Nature of Human Values (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snarey, J. R., J. Reimer and L. Kohlberg: 1985, 'The Development of Social-Moral Reasoning Among Kibbutz Adolescents: A Longitudinal Cross-Cultural Study', Development Psychology 20(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J.: 1984, Estimating Gender Differences in the Comprehension and Preferences of Moral Issues (Unpublished manuscript. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota).

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model', Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B. B., B. Muthen, D. F. Alwin and G. F. Summers: 1977, 'Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models', in D. R. Heise (ed.), Sociological Methodology (Josey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyld, Jones, Cappel: 1993, Nothing Like the Real Thing?: An Empirical Look at The Use of Managerial Student Subjects In Ethical Inquiry in Management (Presented at the Southern Management Association Meetings, Atlanta, GA).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlson, D.S., Kacmar, K.M. Perceptions of Ethics Across Situations: A View Through Three Different Lenses. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 147–160 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017965302686

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017965302686

Keywords

Navigation