Skip to main content
Log in

Pattern ERG and psychophysical functions in Best's disease

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to asses the neurosensory retinal function in 12 patients (24 eyes) with different stages of Best's disease, by determining how pattern and full field flash ERG responses were related to visual acuity, stage of disease and extent of visual field loss. All patients had typically abnormal EOG responses and normal full field-flash ERG responses. Patients were stratified in two groups according to visual acuity. In the first group 12 eyes with visual acuity better than 0.5, all amplitudes and latencies of PERG P50 and N95 responses were in the normal range. Small central scotoma was detected by static perimetry in four of these eyes. In the second group of 12 eyes with visual acuity 0.5 or less, PERG showed reduced both P50 and N95 amplitudes in five eyes, and N95 solely, in two eyes. All patients had central scotomas detected by static perimetry. Progression of the disease, seen in deterioration of visual acuity and progression of central visual field defects, corresponded well with reduction of both PERG P50 and N95 amplitudes. There was no correlation found between visual acuity and EOG responses. Our results show that in Best's distrophy, pattern ERG is getting abnormal with progression of the disease, indicating relative preservation of neurosensory retina in initial stages of the disease. In contrast to EOG - being abnormal in all the patients regardless of the stage of disease - and full field-flash ERG - being normal in most of the patients - PERG gives opportunity for electrophysiological determination of the progression of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Best F. Ñber eine hereditäre Maculaaffektion: Beitrage zur Vererbungslehre.Z Augenheilkund 1905;13:199.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stone EM, Nichols BE, Streb LM, Kimura AE, Sheffield VC.Genetic linkage of vitelliform macular degeneration (Best's disease) to chromosome 11q13.Nat Genet1992; 1(4):246-50.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mansergh FC, Kenna PF, Rudolph G et al. Evidence for genetic heterogeneity in Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy.Hum Genet1995;32(11):855-8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petrukhin K, Koisti MJ, Bakall B, Li W et al.Identification of the gene responsible for Best macular dystrophy.Nat Genet1998;19: 241-7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bakall B, Marknell T, Ingvast S et al. The mutation spectrum of the bestrophin protein - functional implications.Hum Genet1999;104(5):383-9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deutman AF. Electrooculography in families with vitelliform dystrophy of the fovea: Detection of the carrier state.Arch Ophthalmol1969;81:305.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Francois J, De Rouck A, Fernandez-Sasso D. Electrooculography in vitelliform degeneration of the macula.Arch. Ophthalmol 1967;77:726-33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cross HE, Bard L. Electrooculography in Best's macular dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;77(1):46-50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kolder HE.Electro-oculography. In: Heckenlively JR, Arden GB, eds. Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology. Mosby, St. Louis 1991:301-311.

  10. Odom V, Weinstein GV. Clinical visual electrophysiology. In:Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology, Volume (3/9), chapter 5,Lippincott-Raven Publishers, NY,1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frangieh GT, Green WR, Fine SL. A histopathologic study of Best's macular dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol1982; 100:1115.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weingeist TA, Kobrin JL, Watzke RC. Histopathology of Best's macular dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol1982; 100:1108

    Google Scholar 

  13. O'Gorman S, Flathery WA, Fishman GA, Berson EL. Histopathologic findings in Best's macular dystrophy,Arch Ophthalmol1988; 106(9):1261-8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arden GB, Carter RM, McFarlan A.Pattern and Ganzfeld electroretinograms in macular diseases.Br J Ophthalmol1984;68:878-84.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Power WJ, Coleman D, McAuliffe C, Mooney DJ.The pattern ERG in Best's disease. Doc Ophthalmol1991;76:279-284

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maffei L, Fiorentini A. Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve.Science 1981; 211:935-55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holder GE. Significance of abnormal pattern electroretinography in anterior visual pathway dysfunction.Br J Ophthalmol1987;71: 166-71.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hawlina M. Clinical application of retinal and cortical evoked potentials,Neurologija 1990;39:Suppl. 1.211-24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fishman GA, Baca W, Kenneth RA, Derlacki DJ, Glenn AM, Viana M. Visual acuity in patients with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy,Ophthalmology1993;100(11):1665-70.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hawlina M, Konec B. New noncorneal HK-loop electrode for clinical electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol1992;81:253-9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grgič M, Konec B, Mihelin M, Zidar I. Electroretinographic system.Zdrav Vestn1993;62(1):105-108.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marmor MF, Zrenner E. Standard for Clinical Electro-oculography.Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:601-5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bach M, Hawlina M, Holder GE, Marmor MF, Meigen T, Vaegan, Miyake Y. Standard for Pattern Electroretinography.Doc Ophthalmol2000;99: 101: 11-18.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Štrucl M. Characteristics of Pattern electroretinograms in healthy subjects.Zdrav Vest 1987;56: 403-7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jarc-Vidmar, M., Popović, P., Hawlina, M. et al. Pattern ERG and psychophysical functions in Best's disease. Doc Ophthalmol 103, 47–61 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017963015883

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017963015883

Navigation