Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

‘Atomistic’ and ‘Systemic’ Approaches to Research on New, Technology-based Firms: A Literature Study

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dominating view of new, technology-based firms is that these firms are driven by a heroic entrepreneur who pursues aggressive growth. New, technology-based firms are expected to sooner or later develop tangible products with which new market niches are created and existing ones penetrated. Often the only perceived economic impact of new, technology-based firms is one delivered through rapid organic growth.

The argument put forward in the present article is that the conception of new, technology-based firms as growth dynamos is largely misleading and partly the result of the growth bias in the traditional research on new, technology-based firms. In the present article, ten general misconceptions and more or less explicit assumptions of the traditional body of research on new, technology-based firms are contested. Alternative conceptions to replace the traditional ones are proposed. The policy implications of the new conceptions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon, 1969, ‘La Route 128’, Le Progrès Scientifique (October-November).

  • Autio, E., 1993, Technology Transfer Effects of New, Technology-Based Companies, Espoo: Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Industrial Management, 1993: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., 1994a, ‘Four Types of Innovators: A Conceptual and Empirical Study of New, Technology-Based Firms as Innovators’, Halmstad, Sweden: 8th Nordic Conference on Small Business Research, Halmstad Business School.

  • Autio, E., 1994b, ‘Interrelationships Between Systemic Determinants and the Technology Behavior of New, Technology-Based Firms’, Jönköping, Sweden: International Workshop on Entrepreneurship and Innovation in SME's, Jönköping Business School.

  • Autio, E. and N. Geust, 1994, ‘External Technology Linkages of New, Technology-Based Firms in Engineering Based and in Science Based Industries: Implications for Innovation Management’, Manchester, UK: International Conference on High Technology Small Firms, Manchester Business School.

  • Autio, E. and A-P. Hameri, 1994, Technological Systems: Structures, Dynamics, and Sources of Change, Espoo: Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Industrial Management, Working papers 1994: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., N. Kaila, R. Kanerva and I. Kauranen, 1989, Uudet Teknologiayritykset (New, Technology-Based Firms), Helsinki: Finnish National Fund for Research and Development SITRA, B 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, R., 1993, Technology Transfer with Spin-Off Companies: An Empirical Study Based on Companies Spun Off from Cambridge University and the Technical Research Center of Finland, VTT, Espoo: Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Industrial Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balconi, M., 1993, ‘The Notion of Industry and Knowledge Bases: The Evidence of Steel and Mini-Mills’, Industrial and Corporate Change 2(3), 471-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J., J. S. Metcalfe and M. Porteous, 1990, Barriers to Growth in Small Firms, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, K. D., 1984, ‘Is there a Principle for Defining Industries?’, Southern Economic Journal 50.

  • Carlsson, B. and R. Stankiewicz, 1991, ‘On the Nature, Function, and Composition of Technological Systems’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1, 93-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N. and C. Juma, 1987, Long-Run Economics: An Evolutionary Approach to Economic Growth, London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H., 1937, ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica 4, 386-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., 1970, ‘The Palo Alto Experience’, Industrial Research (May).

  • Cooper, A. C., 1971, The Founding of Technologically-Based Firms, Milwaukee: The Center for Venture Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., 1972, ‘Spin-off Companies and Technical Entrepreneurship’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1(February).

  • Cooper, A. C., 1973, ‘Technical Entrepreneurship: What do We Know?’, R&D Management 3(2), 59-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, N. and A. Leeming, 1994, Meeting the Needs of Small IT Firms, Manchester, UK: International Conference on High Technology Small Firms, Manchester Business School.

  • Crevoisier, O. and D. Maillat, 1991, ‘Milieu, Industrial Organization, and Territorial Production System: Towards a New Theory of Spatial Development’, in R. Camagni (ed.), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives, London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daghfous, A. and G. R. White, 1994, ‘Information and Innovation: A Comprehensive Representation’, Research Policy 23(3), 267-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidow, W. H. and M. S. Malone, 1992, The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st century, New York: Harper & Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickenson, P. J. and D. S. Watkins, 1971, Initial Report on Some Financing Characteristics of Small, Technologically-Based Firms and their Relation to Location, Manchester: Manchester Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M., 1993, Technological Collaboration in Industry: Strategy, Policy, and Internationalization in Innovation, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. and D. J. Teece, 1993, Organizational Competences and the Boundaries of the Firm, CCC Working Paper No 93-11, Berkeley: University of Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougier, H., 1971, ‘Risk, Money, Motivation: The Ventures of Venture Capital in Europe’, European Business 28.

  • Doutriaux J. and B. Peterman, 1982, Technology Transfer and Academic Entrepreneurship at Canadian Universities, Ottawa: Technological Innovations Studies Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doutriaux, J., 1987, ‘Growth Patterns of Academic Entrepreneurial Firms’, Journal of Business Venturing 2, 285-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamholtz, E. G., 1990, Growing Pains: How to Manage the Transition from an Entrepreneurship to a Professionally Managed Firm, Oxford: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, J. E., 1991, ‘Models of the Process of Technological Innovation’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 3(4), 439-453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forseth, D. A., 1965, The Role of Government-Sponsored Research Laboratories in the Generation of New Enterprises - A Comparative Analysis, S M Thesis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransman, M., 1993, Information, Knowledge, and Theories of the Firm, Edinburgh: Institute of Japanese-European technology studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., 1971, The role of Small Firms in Innovation in the United Kingdom Since 1945, Report 6, London: Committee of Inquiry on Small Firms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., 1982, Economics of Industrial Innovation, London: Pinter Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. and D. S. Watkins, 1970, ‘Innovation and the Small Firm’, R&D Management 1(1).

  • Gould, A. and D. Keeble, 1984, ‘New Firms and Rural Industrialization in East Anglia’, Regional Studies 18, 189-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M., 1994, ‘The Limits of Silicon Valley: A Critique of Network Theory’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 6(2), 231-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. and B. Hjern, B., 1989, Helping Small Firms Grow: An Implementation Approach, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauranen, I., M. Takala, E. Autio and M. Kaila, 1990, Three First Years: A Study on the First Phases of a New Science Park and of its Tenants (with a summary in English), Espoo: Otaniemi Science Park, 2: 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, N., 1984, The Emergent Firm, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, D. and T. Kelly, 1986, ‘New Firms and High-Technology Industry in the United Kingdom: The Case of Computer Electronics’, in D. Keeble and E. Wever (eds.), New Firms and Regional Development in Europe, London: Croom Helm.Kellock, M., 1992, On Barriers to Growth, Cranfield, United Kingdom: Cranfield School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S. J. and N. Rosenberg, 1986, ‘An Overview on Innovation’, in The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. and P. L. Robertson, 1992, ‘Networks and Innovation in a Modular System: Lessons from the Microcomputer and Stereo Component Industries’, Research Policy 21, 297-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, Arthur D., 1977, New Technology-Based Firms in the United Kingdom and in the Federal Republic of Germany, London: Wilton House Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumme, A., 1994, Potential for Growth: Societal Contributions of the Most Promising Technology-Based Entrepreneurial Companies in Finland - Empirical Evidence, Manchester, U.K.: International Conference on High Technology Small Firms, Manchester Business School.

  • Lundvall, B-å (ed.), 1992, National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau, J., 1992, Reworking the World: Organizations, Technologies, and Cultures in Comparative Perspective, Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E. and C. Snow, 1986, ‘Organizations: New Concepts and New Forms’, California Management Review 28(3), 62-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monck, C. S. P., R. P. Porter, P. Quintas, D. J. Storey and P. Wynarczyk, 1988, Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S. G. Winter, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R. and R. Ramirez, 1993, ‘From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy’, Harvard Business Review (July-August), 65-77.

  • Oakey, R., 1984, High Technology Small Firms, London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakey, R., 1993, ‘High Technology Small Firms: A More Realistic Evaluation of their Growth Potential’, in B. Johannisson, C. Karlsson, D. Storey (eds.), Small Business Dynamics: International, National, and Regional Perspectives, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakey, R., R. Rothwell and S. Y. Cooper, 1988, The Management of Innovation in High Technology Small Firms, London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson C. and C. Wahlbin, 1984, ‘Technology-Based New Ventures from Technical Universities: A Swedish Case’, in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Massachusetts: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, C. and C. Wahlbin, 1987, ‘Firms Started by University Researchers in Sweden - Roots, Roles, Relations, and Growth Patterns’, in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Massachusetts: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, C. and C. Wahlbin, 1986, ‘Technology-Based New Ventures from Swedish Universities: A survey’, in Hornaday et al., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Massachusetts: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, C. and C. Wahlbin, 1993, Teknibaserade Företag Från Högskolan, Linköping, Sweden: Institute for Management of Innovation and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K., 1984, ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: A Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy 13, 343-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K., 1992, ‘Some Foundations for a Theory of the Large Innovating Firm’, in G. Dosi, R. Giannetti, and P. A. Toninelli (eds.), Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 1980, Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., 1985, Competitive Advantage, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poza, E. J., 1989, Smart Growth: Critical Choices for Business Continuity and Prosperity, London: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel, 1990, ‘The Core Competence of the Corporation’, Harvard Business Review (May-June), 79-91.

  • Riggs, H. E., 1983, Managing High-Technology Companies, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B., 1968, ‘Entrepreneurship and Technology: A Basic Study of Innovators’, Research Management 11(4), 249-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B., 1990, Strategic Transformation and the Success of High Technology Companies, Working papers WP #2-90, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B., 1991, Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B. and H. Wainer, 1966, Some Characteristics of Technical Entrepreneur, Working Paper 195-66, Cambridge, U.S.A.: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B. and H. Wainer, 1968, ‘New Enterprises on Route 128’, Science Journal (December).

  • Rodenberger C., McCray J., 1981, ‘Start Ups from a Large University in a Small Town’, in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Massachusetts: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. E, 1966, The Availability of Venture Capital for New, Technically-Based Enterprises, S M Thesis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., 1983, Diffusion of Innovations, third edition, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1983, ‘Innovation and Firm Size: The Case of Dynamic Complementarity’, Journal of General Management 8(6), 5-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1991, ‘External Networking and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms in Europe’, Technovation 11(2), 93-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1992, ‘Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s’, R&D Management 22(3), 221-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1994, ‘Issues in User-Producer Relations in the Innovation Process: The Role of Government’, International Journal of Technology Management 9(5,6,7), 629-649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1994, ‘Towards the Fifth-Generation Innovation Process’, International Marketing Review 11(1), 7-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A., 1991, ‘The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley’, Research Policy 20, 423-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J. A., 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Economic Studies Series, vol XLVI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A., 1939, Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, Philadelphia: Porcupine Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Quince, Wicksteed and ISI, 1986, New Technology-Based Firms, Cambridge: Segal, Quince, and Wicksteed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senker, J., 1994, ‘Tacit Knowledge and Models of Innovation’, Brighton: University of Sussex, SPRU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, R., 1987, Portraits in Silicon, London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatter, S., 1992, Gambling on Growth: How to Manage the Small High-Tech Firm, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankiewicz, R., 1990, ‘Basic Technologies and the Innovation Process’, in J. Sigurdsson (ed.), Measuring the Dynamics of Technological Change, London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankiewicz, R., 1994, ‘Spin-Off Companies from Universities', Science and Public Policy 21(2), 99-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D., K. Keasey, R. Watson and P. Wynarczyk, 1987, The Performance of Small Firms, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. and B. Harrison, 1991, ‘Flexibility, Hierarchy, and Regional Development: The Changing Structure of Industrial Production Systems and their Forms of Governance in the 1990s’, Research Policy 20, 407-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Villa, L., 1994, Outsourcing and Regional Strategic Alliances in Small, Technologically Advanced Firms, Jönköping, Sweden: Workshop on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Jönköping Business School.

  • Suarez-Villa, L. and P-H. Hahn, 1990, ‘International Trends in Electronics Manufacturing and the Strategy of Industrialization’, Rivista Internazionale di Science Economiche e Commerciali 37, 381-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., G. Pisano and A. Schuen, 1990, Firm Capabilities, Resources, and the Concept of Strategy, CCC Working Paper No. 90-8, Berkeley: University of Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplitz, P. V., 1965, Spin-Off Enterprises from a Large Government Sponsored Laboratory, S M Thesis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, P., 1965, The Founding and Growth Process of New Technical Enterprises, S M Thesis, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyebjee T. and Bruno A. V., 1982, ‘A Comparative Analysis of California Start-Ups from 1977 to 1980’, in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Massachusetts: Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E., 1988, The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. S., 1973, Technical Entrepreneurship: A Cis-Atlantic View, R’D Management 3(2), 65-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., 1994, Survival and Employment Growth Contrasts Between ‘Types’of Owner-Managed High-Technology Firms, Jönköping, Sweden: International Workshop on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in SME's, Jönköping Business School.

  • Williamson, O. E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Industrial Management, Helsinki University of Technology, Otakaari 1 F, FIN-02150, Espoo, Finland

    Erkko Autio

Authors
  1. Erkko Autio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Autio, E. ‘Atomistic’ and ‘Systemic’ Approaches to Research on New, Technology-based Firms: A Literature Study. Small Business Economics 9, 195–209 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017960610467

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017960610467

Keywords

Search

Navigation