Skip to main content
Log in

Comment 1 on Talvitie's paper: The games transportation academics play

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Beckmann M, McGuire CB & Winsten C (1956) Studies in the Economics of Transportation. New Haven, Conneticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell MGH, Lam WHK, Ploss G & Inaudi D (1993) Stochastic user equilibrium assignment and iterative balancing. In: Daganzo C (ed) Proceedings, 12th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (pp. 427–440). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braess D (1968) über ein Paradox der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmungsforschung 12: 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruynooghe M, Gilgert A & Sakarovitch M (1968) Une methode d'affectation du traffic. Proceedings, 4th International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow. West Germany: Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defermos SC (1971) An extended traffic assignment model with application to two-way traffic. Transportation Science 5: 366–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo CF (1982) Unconstrained extremal formulation of some transportation equilibrium problems. Transportation Science 16: 332–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo CF & Sheffi Y (1977) On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transportation Science 11: 253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dial RB (1971) Probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Research 5: 83–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domencich T & McFadden D (1975) Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioural Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • Erlander S & Stewart NF (1990) The Gravity Model in Transportation Analysis: Theory and Extensions. Utrecht: VSP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk C (1980) Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment. Transportation Research 14B: 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt PB, Robertson DI, Bretherton RD & Winton RJ (1981) SCOOT - A traffic responsive method of coordinating signals. TRRL Laboratory Report LR 1014.

  • Lighthill MJ & Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves: A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A 229: 317–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WB & Sheffi Y (1982) The convergence of equilibrium algorithms with predetermined step sizes. Transportation Science 16: 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DI (1969) TRANSYT - A traffic network study tool. TRRL Laboratory Report LR 253.

  • Smith MJ (1979) The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria. Transportation Research 13B: 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vliet D (19982) SATURN: a modern assignment model. Traffic Engineering and Control 23: 578–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop JG (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proceedings, Institution of Civil Engineers II(1): 325–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AG (1967) A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research 1: 253–2699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AG (1974) Urban and Regional Models in Geography and Planning. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, M.G.H. Comment 1 on Talvitie's paper: The games transportation academics play. Transportation 24, 33–42 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017959909121

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017959909121

Keywords

Navigation