Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 445–450 | Cite as

Are New Zealand Business Students More Unethical Than Non-Business Students?

  • Alan C. B. Tse
  • Alan K. M. Au
Article

Abstract

Using undergraduate students from the Waikato University in New Zealand as a sample, this study compared the ethical positions of students of different field of study and demographic characteristics. It was found that the ethical standard of business students are not significantly different from that of non-business students. The findings also suggest that female students are more ethical than male students, and senior students are more ethical than junior students.

Besides sex and year of study, other variables studied were parents' occupation, religiosity and household income of the students. All these variables were found to have no significant impact on the ethical position of the students. Furthermore, all the interaction effects between the variables studied and the students' major field of study were nonsignificant.

Keywords

Income Economic Growth Interaction Effect Demographic Characteristic Household Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arlow, P.: 1991, 'Personal Characteristics in College Students' Evaluations of Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 63–69.Google Scholar
  2. Arlow, P. and T. A. Ulrich: 1980, 'Business Ethics, Social Responsibility and Business Students: An Empirical Comparison of Clark's Study', Akron Business and Economic Review 11(3), 17–22.Google Scholar
  3. Beltramini, R. F., R. A. Peterson and G. Kozmetsky: 1984, 'Concerns of College Students Regarding Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 3, 195–200.Google Scholar
  4. Betz, M., L. O'Connell and J. M. Sheppard: 1989, 'Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behaviour', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 321–324.Google Scholar
  5. Borkowski, S. C. and Y. J. Ugras: 1992, 'The Ethical Attitudes of Students as a Function of Age, Sex and Experience', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 961–979.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, J. R. and R. E. Welton: 1991, 'Professional Ethics: Business Students' Perceptions', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 451–463.Google Scholar
  7. Drucker, P. F.: 1982, 'The Changing World of the Executive', Times Books.Google Scholar
  8. Ferrell, O. C. and S. J. Skinner: 1988, 'Ethical Behaviour and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations', Journal of Marketing Research (Feb.), 103–109.Google Scholar
  9. Fritzsche, D.: 1988, 'An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequences of the Decision, Management Position and Sex of the Respondent', Journal of Macromarketing (Fall), 29–39.Google Scholar
  10. Hawkins, D. I. and A. B. Cacanougher: 1972, 'Students Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Evaluation', Journal of Marketing, 61–64.Google Scholar
  11. Kraft, K. L.: 1991, 'The Relative Importance of Social Responsibility in Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Student Responses', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 179–188.Google Scholar
  12. Kristol, I.: 1987, 'Ethics, Anyone? Or Morals?', Wall Street Journal (Sept. 15), 32.Google Scholar
  13. Lane, M. S., D. Schaupp and B. Parsons: 1988, 'Pygmalion Effect: An Issue for Business Education and Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 223–229.Google Scholar
  14. Lewin, T.: 1983, 'Business Ethics, New Appeal', New York Times (December 11), F3.Google Scholar
  15. McNichols, C. W. and T. W. Zimmerer: 1985, 'Situational Ethics: An Empirical Study of Differentiators of Student Attitudes', Journal of Business Ethics 4, 175–180.Google Scholar
  16. Meising, P. and J. F. Preble: 1985, 'A Comparison of Five Business Philosophies', Journal of Business Ethics 4, 465–476.Google Scholar
  17. Murray, T. J.: 1987, 'Ethics Programs: Just a Pretty Face?', Business Month (Sept.), 30–32.Google Scholar
  18. Rest, J. R.: 1988, 'Can Ethics be Taught in Professional Schools? The Psychological Research', Easier Said Than Done (Winter), 22–26.Google Scholar
  19. Rohatyn, F. G.: 1988, 'Ethics in America's Money Culture', in Ethics in American Business: A Special Report (Touche Ross, New York).Google Scholar
  20. Ruegger, D. and E. W. King: 1992, 'A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender upon Student Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 179–186.Google Scholar
  21. Salmons, S.: 1987, 'Suddenly Business Schools Tackle Ethics', New York Times, Educational Life (Aug. 2), 64–69.Google Scholar
  22. Shepard, J. M. and L. S. Hartenian: 1990, 'Egoistic and Ethical Orientations of University Student Toward Work-Related Decisions', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 303–310.Google Scholar
  23. Stevens, G.: 1984, 'Business Ethics and Social Responsibility: The Responses of Present and Future Managers', Akron Business and Economic Review 15(3), 6–11.Google Scholar
  24. Vogel, D.: 1987, 'Could An Ethics Course Have Kept Ivan From Going Bad?', Wall Street Journal 27, 24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan C. B. Tse
    • 1
  • Alan K. M. Au
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MarketingChinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations