Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are New Zealand Business Students More Unethical Than Non-Business Students?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using undergraduate students from the Waikato University in New Zealand as a sample, this study compared the ethical positions of students of different field of study and demographic characteristics. It was found that the ethical standard of business students are not significantly different from that of non-business students. The findings also suggest that female students are more ethical than male students, and senior students are more ethical than junior students.

Besides sex and year of study, other variables studied were parents' occupation, religiosity and household income of the students. All these variables were found to have no significant impact on the ethical position of the students. Furthermore, all the interaction effects between the variables studied and the students' major field of study were nonsignificant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arlow, P.: 1991, 'Personal Characteristics in College Students' Evaluations of Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P. and T. A. Ulrich: 1980, 'Business Ethics, Social Responsibility and Business Students: An Empirical Comparison of Clark's Study', Akron Business and Economic Review 11(3), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltramini, R. F., R. A. Peterson and G. Kozmetsky: 1984, 'Concerns of College Students Regarding Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 3, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M., L. O'Connell and J. M. Sheppard: 1989, 'Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behaviour', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, S. C. and Y. J. Ugras: 1992, 'The Ethical Attitudes of Students as a Function of Age, Sex and Experience', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 961–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. R. and R. E. Welton: 1991, 'Professional Ethics: Business Students' Perceptions', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F.: 1982, 'The Changing World of the Executive', Times Books.

  • Ferrell, O. C. and S. J. Skinner: 1988, 'Ethical Behaviour and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations', Journal of Marketing Research (Feb.), 103–109.

  • Fritzsche, D.: 1988, 'An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequences of the Decision, Management Position and Sex of the Respondent', Journal of Macromarketing (Fall), 29–39.

  • Hawkins, D. I. and A. B. Cacanougher: 1972, 'Students Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Evaluation', Journal of Marketing, 61–64.

  • Kraft, K. L.: 1991, 'The Relative Importance of Social Responsibility in Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Student Responses', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristol, I.: 1987, 'Ethics, Anyone? Or Morals?', Wall Street Journal (Sept. 15), 32.

  • Lane, M. S., D. Schaupp and B. Parsons: 1988, 'Pygmalion Effect: An Issue for Business Education and Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, T.: 1983, 'Business Ethics, New Appeal', New York Times (December 11), F3.

  • McNichols, C. W. and T. W. Zimmerer: 1985, 'Situational Ethics: An Empirical Study of Differentiators of Student Attitudes', Journal of Business Ethics 4, 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meising, P. and J. F. Preble: 1985, 'A Comparison of Five Business Philosophies', Journal of Business Ethics 4, 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. J.: 1987, 'Ethics Programs: Just a Pretty Face?', Business Month (Sept.), 30–32.

  • Rest, J. R.: 1988, 'Can Ethics be Taught in Professional Schools? The Psychological Research', Easier Said Than Done (Winter), 22–26.

  • Rohatyn, F. G.: 1988, 'Ethics in America's Money Culture', in Ethics in American Business: A Special Report (Touche Ross, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegger, D. and E. W. King: 1992, 'A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender upon Student Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmons, S.: 1987, 'Suddenly Business Schools Tackle Ethics', New York Times, Educational Life (Aug. 2), 64–69.

  • Shepard, J. M. and L. S. Hartenian: 1990, 'Egoistic and Ethical Orientations of University Student Toward Work-Related Decisions', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G.: 1984, 'Business Ethics and Social Responsibility: The Responses of Present and Future Managers', Akron Business and Economic Review 15(3), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D.: 1987, 'Could An Ethics Course Have Kept Ivan From Going Bad?', Wall Street Journal 27, 24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marketing, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

    Alan C. B. Tse & Alan K. M. Au

Authors
  1. Alan C. B. Tse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan K. M. Au
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tse, A.C.B., Au, A.K.M. Are New Zealand Business Students More Unethical Than Non-Business Students?. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 445–450 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017957210848

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017957210848

Keywords

Search

Navigation