This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Anderson, T. and Twining,W. (1991). Analysis of Evidence: How to Do Things with Facts Based on Wigmore's Science of JudiciaI Proof. Little, Brown: Boston, MA.
Baring-Gould, W. S. (1967). The Annotated Sherlock Holmes. two volumes. Clarkson N. Potter, Inc.: NY.
Boden, M. (1991). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Basic Books: NY.
Carson, D. (ed.) 0000. Special Issue: United States v. Shonubi. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behavior Science and Law. Volume 4, Issue 4, 133-172.
Cohen, L. J. (1977). The Probable and the Provable. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
Cohen, L. J. (1989). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Induction and Probability. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
Cohen, M. and Nagel, E. (1934). An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. Harcourt, Brace and Co.: NY.
Coveny, P. and Highfield, R. (1995). Frontiers of Complexity: The Search for Order in a Chaotic Fawcett-Columbine: NY.
Eccles, J. C. (1970). Facing Reality: Philosophical Adventures by a Brain Scientist. Springer-Verlag: NY.
Eco, U. (1983). Horns, Hooves, Insteps: Some Hypotheses on Three Types of Abduction. In Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. (eds.) The Sign of Three: Dupin,. Holmes. Peirce, 198-220. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN.
Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. (eds.) (1983). The Sign of Three: Dupin. Holmes. Peirce. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN.
Eco, U. (1988). Foucault's Pendulum. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: NY.
Einstein, A. (1954). A Testimonial from Professor Einstein. In Hadamard, J. The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, 142-143. Dover: NY.
Fayyad, U, Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., and Uthurusamy, R. (eds.) (1996). Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI Press/MIT Press: Menlo Park, CA.
Hadamard, J. (1954). The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Dover: NY.
Heckerman, D. (1996). Bayesian Networks for Knowledge Discovery. In Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., and Uthurusamy, R. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 273-305. AAAI Press/MIT Press: Menlo Park, CA.
Hintikka, J. and Hintikka, M. (1983a). Sherlock Holmes Confronts Modern Logic: Toward a Theory of Information-Seeking Through Questioning. In Eco, U., Sebeok, T. (eds.) The Sign of Three: Dupin. Holmes, Peirce, 154-169. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN.
Hintikka, J. (1983b). Sherlock Holmes Formalized. In Eco, U. and Sebeok, T. (eds.) The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes. Peirce, 170-178. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN.
Holland, H. I., Holyoak, K., Nisbett, R., and Thagard, P. (1989). Induction: Processes of Inference. Learning. and Discovery. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Josephson, J. and Josephson, S. (1994). Abductive Inference: Computation. Philosophy. Technology. Cambridge University Press.
Kadane, J. and Schum, D. (1996). A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence. Wiley: NY.
Kneale, W. (1952). Probability and Induction. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
Koestler, A. (1989). The Act of Creation. Arkana, Penguin Group: London.
Langley, P., Simon, H., Bradshaw, G., and Zytkow, J. (1987). Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Process. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Michalski, R. (1994). Inferential Theory of Learning: Developing Foundations for Multistrategy Learning. In Michalski, R. and Tecuci, G. (eds.) Machine Learning: A Multistrategy Approach, Vol. IV, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Francisco, CA.
Miller, A. (1996). Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art. Springer-Verlag: NY.
Neapolitan, R. (1990). Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Theory and Algorithms. Wiley: NY.
Oldroyd, D. (1986). The Arch of Knowledge: An Introductory Study of the History of the Philosophy and Methodology of Science. Methuen: NY.
Peirce, C. S. [1898] (1992). In Ketner, K. (ed.) Reasoning and the Logic of Things: Cambridge Conferences 1898. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Peirce, C. S. [1901] (1955). Abduction and Induction. In Buchler, J. (ed.) Philosophical Writings of Peirce, 150-156. Dover: NY.
Peirce, C. S. [1903] (1955). Perceptual Judgments. In Buchler, J. (ed.) Philosophical Writings of Peirce, 302-309. Dover: NY.
Peng, Y. and Reggia, J. (1987). A Probabilistic Causal Model for Diagnostic Problem Solving, Parts I and II. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man. and Cybernetics, vol. SME-17.
Penrose, R. (1991). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers. Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Penguin Books: NY.
Platinum Technology. Paradigm Plus (1996). Methods Manual. Release 3.5.
Poincaré, H. [1908] (1956). Mathematical Creation. In Newman, J. (ed.), The World of Semantics. Vol. IV. Simon and Schuster: NY.
Popper, K. (1968). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Harper Torchbooks: NY.
Price Waterhouse Technology Forecast: 1966. (1996) Price Waterhouse World Technology Centre: Menlo Park, CA.
Reichenbach, H. (1968). The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.
Schum, D. (1989). Knowledge, Credibility, and Probability. Journal of Behavioral Decision 2: 39-62.
Schum. D. (1992). Hearsay from a Layperson. Cardozo Law Review 14(1): 1-77.
Schum, D. (1994). Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. Wiley: NY.
Schum, D. and Tillers, P. (1991). Marshaling Evidence for Adversary Litigation. Cardozo Law Review 13(2-3): 657-704.
Simon, H. (1973). Does Scientific Discovery have a Logic? Philosophy of Science 40: 471-480.
Thagard, P. (1993). Computational Philosophy of Science. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Tillers, P. and Schum, D. (1988). Charting New Territory in Judicial Proof: Beyond Wigmore. Cardozo Law Review 9(3): 907-966
Tillers, P. and Schum, D. (1991). A Theory of Preliminary Fact Investigation. University of California Davis Law Review 24(4), 931-1012.
Tursman, R. (1987). Peirce's Theory of Scientific Discovery: A System of Logic Conceived as Semiotic. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN.
Wigmore, J. H. (1913). The Problem of Proof. Illinois Law Review 8(2), 77-103
Wigmore, J. H. (1937). The Science of Judicial Proof: As Given by Logic. Psychology, and General Experience and Illustrated in Judicial Trials. 3rd ed. Little, Brown: Boston, MA.
Wolpert, L. (1992). The Unnatural Nature of Science. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schum, D.A. Evidence marshaling for imaginative fact investigation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9, 165–188 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017941304013
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017941304013