Skip to main content

Adaptationism: Hypothesis or Heuristic?

Abstract

Elliott Sober (1987, 1993) and Orzack and Sober (forthcoming) argue that adaptationism is a very general hypothesis that can be tested by testing various particular hypotheses that invoke natural selection to explain the presence of traits in populations of organisms. In this paper, I challenge Sober‘s claim that adaptationism is an hypothesis and I argue that it is best viewed as a heuristic (or research strategy). Biologists would still have good reasons for employing this research strategy even if it turns out that natural selection is not the most important cause of evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R.: 1992, Discovering Complexity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.: 1978, ‘Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 9, 181–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.: 1990, Adaptation and Environment, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L.: 1991, Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.: 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.: 1986, Epistemology and Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. and Lewontin, R.: 1979, ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adptationist Programme’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205, 581–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, B.: 1989, ‘Functional Explanations in Sociobiology’, Biology and Philosophy 4, 131–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.: 1993, The Origins of Order, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettlewell, H.: 1955, ‘Selection Experiments on Industrial Melanism in Moths’, Heredity 9, 323–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M.: 1983, The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edition), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., Bradshaw, G., Simon, S., and Zytkow, J.: 1987, Scientific Discovery, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1987, ‘Progress or Rationality: The Prospects for Normative Naturalism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1983, ‘How to Carry Out the Adaptationist Research Program’, American Naturalist 121, 324–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzack, S. and Sober, E.: (forthcoming), ‘Optimality Models and the Long Run Test of Adaptationism’, American Naturalist.

  • Popper, K.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1974, ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in M. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, La Salle, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D.: 1988, ‘Survival of the Fittest: Law of Evolution or Law of Probability?’, Biology and Philosophy 3, 349–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D.: 1989, ‘Adaptationist Explanations’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 20, 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D.: 1991, ‘How-Possibly Explanations in Biology’, Acta Biotheoretica 39, 141–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D.: (forthcoming), ‘Functional Language and Biological Discovery’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science.

  • Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1987, ‘What is Adaptationism?’, in J. Dupre (ed.), The Latest and the Best, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1993, Philosophy of Biology, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M.: 1994, ‘Social Empiricism’, Nous 28, 325–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Resnik, D. Adaptationism: Hypothesis or Heuristic?. Biology & Philosophy 12, 39–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017936706537

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017936706537

  • adaptationism
  • natural selection
  • heuristics