Advertisement

Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 39–50 | Cite as

Adaptationism: Hypothesis or Heuristic?

  • David Resnik
Article

Abstract

Elliott Sober (1987, 1993) and Orzack and Sober (forthcoming) argue that adaptationism is a very general hypothesis that can be tested by testing various particular hypotheses that invoke natural selection to explain the presence of traits in populations of organisms. In this paper, I challenge Sober‘s claim that adaptationism is an hypothesis and I argue that it is best viewed as a heuristic (or research strategy). Biologists would still have good reasons for employing this research strategy even if it turns out that natural selection is not the most important cause of evolution.

adaptationism natural selection heuristics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R.: 1992, Discovering Complexity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  2. Brandon, R.: 1978, ‘Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 9, 181–206.Google Scholar
  3. Brandon, R.: 1990, Adaptation and Environment, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  4. Darden, L.: 1991, Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Endler, J.: 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  6. Goldman, A.: 1986, Epistemology and Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Gould, S. and Lewontin, R.: 1979, ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adptationist Programme’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205, 581–98.Google Scholar
  8. Horan, B.: 1989, ‘Functional Explanations in Sociobiology’, Biology and Philosophy 4, 131–58.Google Scholar
  9. Kauffman, S.: 1993, The Origins of Order, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Kettlewell, H.: 1955, ‘Selection Experiments on Industrial Melanism in Moths’, Heredity 9, 323–42.Google Scholar
  11. Kimura, M.: 1983, The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Kitcher, P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhn, T.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edition), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Langley, P., Bradshaw, G., Simon, S., and Zytkow, J.: 1987, Scientific Discovery, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Laudan, L.: 1987, ‘Progress or Rationality: The Prospects for Normative Naturalism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 19–31.Google Scholar
  16. Mayr, E.: 1983, ‘How to Carry Out the Adaptationist Research Program’, American Naturalist 121, 324–34.Google Scholar
  17. Orzack, S. and Sober, E.: (forthcoming), ‘Optimality Models and the Long Run Test of Adaptationism’, American Naturalist.Google Scholar
  18. Popper, K.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  19. Popper, K.: 1974, ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, in M. Schlipp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, La Salle, IL.Google Scholar
  20. Resnik, D.: 1988, ‘Survival of the Fittest: Law of Evolution or Law of Probability?’, Biology and Philosophy 3, 349–62.Google Scholar
  21. Resnik, D.: 1989, ‘Adaptationist Explanations’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 20, 193–213.Google Scholar
  22. Resnik, D.: 1991, ‘How-Possibly Explanations in Biology’, Acta Biotheoretica 39, 141–49.Google Scholar
  23. Resnik, D.: (forthcoming), ‘Functional Language and Biological Discovery’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
  24. Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  25. Sober, E.: 1987, ‘What is Adaptationism?’, in J. Dupre (ed.), The Latest and the Best, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  26. Sober, E.: 1993, Philosophy of Biology, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  27. Solomon, M.: 1994, ‘Social Empiricism’, Nous 28, 325–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Resnik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of WyomingLaramieU.S.A

Personalised recommendations