Abstract
High taxes and generous social benefits are often blamed for causing unemployment. The conventional view is that if taxes on labour are (too) high, jobs will be lost and that generous social benefits will exert an upward pressure on unions' wage claims. In the case where unions co-ordinate their wage bargaining strategy, this need not be the case. A simple model is used to illustrate the effects of the tax rate level and tax internalization on unions' wage bargaining strategy. A high marginal tax rate along with endogeneity of the average tax rate shifts the union's trade-off between wages and employment in favour of the latter. These shifts may have contributed to the success of the so-called ‘polder model’ or ‘tulip model’ of the Netherlands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Calmfors, L. and J. Driffill (1988), ‘Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance,’ Economic Policy, 6, pp. 14–61.
Gelauff, G.M.M. (1995), Taxation, Social Security and the Labour Market: An Application. General Equilibrium Model for The Netherlands, Helmond, Wibro.
Hersoug, T. (1984), ‘Union Wage Responses to Tax Changes,’ Oxford Economic Papers, 36(1), pp. 37–51.
Hersoug, T., K.N. Kjaer, and A. Rodseth (1986), ‘Wages, Taxes and the Utility-maximizing Trade Union: A Confrontation with Norwegian Data,’ Oxford Economic Papers, 38(3), pp. 403–423.
Klandermans, P.G. and J. Visser (eds.), ‘De vakbeweging na de welvaartstaat,’ Assen, Van Gorcum.
Koskela, E. and J. Vilmunen (1996), ‘Tax Progression is Good for Employment in Popular Models of Trade Union Behaviour,’ Labour Economics, 3(1), pp. 65–80.
Lever, M.H.C. and J.M. van Werkhooven (1996), ‘Insider Power, Market Power, Firm Size and Wages: Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing Industries,’ Labour Economics, 3(1), pp. 93–107.
Menil, G. de (1971), Bargaining: Monopoly Power versus Union Power, Cambridge, MITT Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Employment Outlook 1999, Paris, OECD.
Rosen, S. (1970), ‘Unionism and the Occupational Wage Structure in the United States,’ International Economic Review, 11, pp. 269–286.
Siebert, H. (1997), ‘Labor Market Rigidities: At the Root of Unemployment in Europe,’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), pp. 37–54.
Simons, H.C. (1944), ‘Some Reflections on Syndicalism,’ Journal of Political Economy, 52, pp. 1–25.
Soskice, D. (1990), ‘Wage Determination: The Changing Role of Institutions in Advanced Industrialized Countries,’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6(4), pp. 36–61.
Visser, J. and A. Hemerijck (1997), ‘A Dutch Miracle’: Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groot, L. Tax Level and Tax Internalization Effects on Union Wage Bargaining. De Economist 149, 219–232 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017591606418
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017591606418