Abstract
A system of research assessment was developed and implemented inHong Kong during the period from 1991 to 1994 as an input to theassessment of the public recurrent funding allocations of theterritory's higher education institutions and as an extension ofthe University Grants Committee's other quality assuranceactivities. Refinements were subsequently introduced for the nexttwo assessment exercises in 1996 and 1999. This paper describesthe evolution of the process, identifies some significantdifferences from that in the UK on which it was modelled, andevaluates the 1999 research assessment exercise, in particularthe application in that context of the Carnegie Foundation'sdefinitions of research and research-related scholarlyactivities, viz. the scholarships of ``discovery, integration,application and teaching''.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyer, E.L. (1990). ‘Scholarship reconsidered’, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Davies, G. (1994). Overview of recent developments in HE. HEFCE document M2/94.
French, N.J. et al. (1999). ‘Research assessment in Hong Kong’, Journal of International Education 10(1) (Spring), 46–53.
Massy, W.F. and French, N.J. (1999). ‘Teaching and learning quality process review: What has the programme achieved in Hong Kong’, Paper presented at the 1999 Conference of the International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education, Santiago, Chile, 2–5 May.
Massy, W.F. and French, N.J. (1999). “Teaching and learning quality process review: What has the programme achieved in Hong Kong”; and Massy, W.F., Thompson, Q. and French, N.J. (1999). “Management reviews: An outline of the Hong Kong programme?” Papers presented at the 1999 Conference of the International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education, Santiago, Chile, 2–5 May 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
French, N.J., Massy, W.F. & Young, K. Research assessment in Hong Kong. Higher Education 42, 35–46 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017589018092
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017589018092