Skip to main content
Log in

The invertebrate fauna of a physically modified urban river

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The typical urban river is affected by various factors relating to water quality problems, physical habitat modification (for flood prevention) and flashy flows. These restrict macroinvertebrate biodiversity such that a few tolerant taxa may dominate and more sensitive organisms may be completely absent. This paper presents the findings of a year long, macroinvertebrate survey of an urban river catchment and investigates the effects of physical habitat modification on macroinvertebrates using various analytical tools. It is demonstrated that considerable variation in invertebrate species, abundance, diversity and tolerance exists between different urban rivers, sites on the same river and individual sites at different sampling times. Analysis of paired sites with similar water quality, but contrasting physical habitat, indicates that less modified sites support a slightly higher quality macroinvertebrate fauna (defined by biotic score and beta diversity) than heavily engineered sites. It is concluded that water quality is the primary limiting factor of invertebrate biodiversity in the heavily urbanized River Tame catchment. The removal of heavy engineering structures may facilitate improvements to invertebrate fauna in urban rivers only in conjunction with improvements to water quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armitage, P. D., D. Moss & J. F. Wright, 1983. The performance of a new biological waste quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of polluted river water sites. Wat. Res. 17: 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bascombe, A. D., J. B. Ellis, D. M. Revitt & R. B. E. Shutes, 1989. Macroinvertebrate biomonitoring and water quality management within urban catchments. Technical report, Middlesex Polytechnic, London: 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, J., 1998. Last instar larvae and pupae of the Simuliidae of Britain and Ireland: a key with brief ecological notes. The Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranston, P. S., 1982. A Key to the Larvae of the British Orthocladiinae (Chironomidae). (Scientific Publication, No. 45.) Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, P. F., 1986. A Key to the Major Groups of British Freshwater Invertebrates. Field Studies publication no. 6: 531–579. AIDGAP, Field Studies Council, Shrewsbury, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L. J. & H. A. Hawkes, 1981. Some effects of organic pollution on the distribution and seasonal incidence of Chironomidae in riffles in the River Cole. Freshwat. Biol. 11: 549–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edington, J. M. & A. G. Hildrew, 1995. A revised key to caseless caddis of the British Isles. The Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. M., 1996. British Freshwater Megaloptera and Neuroptera: a Key with Ecological Notes. The Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. M., & K. H. Mann, 1979. A Key to the British Leeches, with Notes on their Life Cycles and Ecology. The Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. M., U. H. Hompesch & T. T. Macan, 1988. Larvae of the British Ephemeroptera. The Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. B., 1995. Procedures for the assessment of biological responses to episodic discharges in urban catchments. Manuscripts in Freshwat. Ecol. 230: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. B., 1991. Urban runoff quality in the UK: Problems, prospects and procedures. Applied Geography. 11: 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency, 1998. Local Environment Action Plan-Tame catchment. Environment Agency, West Midlands, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, H. A., 1964. Effects of domestic and industrial discharges on the ecology of riffles in Midland streams. Presented at the International Conference on Water Pollution Research, London Sept. 1962 (Pergamon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1960. The biology of polluted waters. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organisation for Standardisation, 1979. Assessment of the biological quality of rivers by a macroinvertebrate 'score'. ISO/TC 147/SCS/WG 6 N S.

  • Johnson, R. K., T. Wiederholm & D. M. Rosenberg, 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring using individual organisms, populations and species assemblages of benthic macroinvertebrates. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinverterbates. Chapman & Hall, New York, US: 40–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennen, J. G., 1999. Relation of macroinvertebrate community impairment to catchment characteristics in New Jersey streams. J. Amer. Wat. Res. Bull., 35: 939–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J., 1985. Ecology. The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. 3rd edn. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macan, T. T., 1977. British Fresh and Brackish Water Gastropods. 4th edn. The Freshwater Biology Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock, I., 1999. The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshwat. Biol. 41, 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, R. H. & A. Georges, 1993. Analysis and interpretation of benthic macroinvertebrate surveys. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinverterbates. Chapman & Hall, New York, US: 234–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P., 1963. Ecology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. M., R. A. Coler & P. J. Godfrey, 1981. Ecological effects of urban stormwater runoff on benthic invertebrates inhabiting the Green River, MA. Hydrobiology 83, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1993. Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinverterbates. Chapman & Hall, New York, US: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, I. D., B. Wallace & G. N. Philipson, 1990. A Key to the Case Bearing Caddis Larvae of Britain and Ireland. The Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, H. G., 1984. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: a review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Wat. Res. 18: 653–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Research Council plc., 1998. Initial planning for River Tame UPM investigations: Phase 1, identification of wet weather pollution problems. Revised project report (UC 3083-Jan 1998), Water Research Council plc., U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiederholm, T., 1983. Chironomidae of the holarctic region-Keys and diagnoses (Part 1-Larvae). Ent. Scand. Suppl. 19.

  • Wilson, M. V. & A. Shmida, 1984. Measuring beta diversity with presence/absence data. J. Ecol. 72: 1055–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterbottom, J. H., S. E. Orton, A. G. Hildrew & J. Lancaster, 1997. Field experiments of flow refugia in streams. Freshwat. Biol. 37: 569–580.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beavan, L., Sadler, J. & Pinder, C. The invertebrate fauna of a physically modified urban river. Hydrobiologia 445, 97–108 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017584105641

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017584105641

Navigation