Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of ultrasonography in the detection of adrenal masses: Comparison with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare detection rates of adrenal tumors by ultrasonography,computed tomography and magnetic resonance image, we studied 61patients with adrenal tumor, who underwent adrenalectomy. In 45(73.8%) of the 61 patients, adrenal tumor was detected by ultrasonography. However, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging could detect all adrenal tumors. All adrenal tumors measuring more than 3.0 cm in diameter were detected by ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance image. When adrenal tumors were smaller than 3.0 cm, however,ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging correctly found adrenal tumors in 30 (65.2%) and 46(100.0%) of 46 patients and 30 (100.0%) of 30 patients,respectively. These facts suggest that ultrasonography seems to be an effective diagnostic procedure for the prevention of overlooking adrenal tumors larger than 3.0 cm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Copeland PM. The incidentally discovered adrenal mass. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98: 940.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gross MD, Shapiro B. Clinically silent adrenal masses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993; 77: 885.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunnick NR. Adrenal imaging: Current status. A J R 1990; 154: 927.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Terzolo M, Ali A, Osella G, Mazza E. The Gruppo Piemontese Incidentalomi Surrenalici: Prevalence of adrenal carcinoma among incidentally discovered adrenal masses. A retrospective study from 1989 to 1994. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 814.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khafagi FA, Gross MD, Shapiro B, Glazer GM, Francis I, Thompson NW. Clinical significance of the large adrenal mass. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 282.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ross, NS, Aron DC. Hormonal evaluation of the patient with an incidentally discovered adrenal mass. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 1401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Erkel AR, van Gils AP, Lequin M, Kruitwagen C, Bloem JL, Falke THM. CT and MIR distinction of adenomas and nonadenomas of the adrenal gland. J Comput Assit Tomogr 1994; 18: 432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Korobkin M, Brodeur FJ, Francis IR, Quint LE, Dunnick NR, Londy F. CT time. Attenuation washout curves of adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas. AJR 1998; 170: 747.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan

    Y. Suzuki, I. Sasagawa, H. Suzuki, T. Izumi, H. Kaneko & T. Nakada

Authors
  1. Y. Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Sasagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Izumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Kaneko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T. Nakada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, Y., Sasagawa, I., Suzuki, H. et al. The role of ultrasonography in the detection of adrenal masses: Comparison with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Int Urol Nephrol 32, 303–306 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017583211460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017583211460

Search

Navigation