Abstract
People turn out to cast their votes simply because they want to ``cheer'' or ``boo'' their favored or unfavored candidates. This expressive voting behavior is in marked contrast to the instrumental voting behavior, i.e., people vote because they perceive voting as a means of achieving a particular election outcome. In this paper we report an econometric study on voting behavior that uses data from the 1988 American National Election Study. The results reveal that the ``cheering'' and ``booing'' effects are statistically significant, and that they exert substantial influence on bothturnout and voter choice. We also obtain evidence against theproposition that people turn out to vote because they considerthemselves to be potentially decisive with regard to the electionoutcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Aldrich, J.H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science 37: 246-78.
Anderson, S.P. and De Palma, A. (1992). Multiproduct firms: A nested logit approach. Journal of Industrial Economics 40: 261-276.
Anderson, S.P., de Palma, A. and Thisse, J.-F. (1992). Discrete choice theory of product differentiation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ashenfelter, O. and Jr. Kelly, S. (1975). Determinants of participation in presidential elections. Journal of Law and Economics 18: 695-733.
Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J. (1984). Voter choice: Evaluating political alternatives. American Behavioral Scientist 28: 185-201.
Brennan, G. and Hamlin, A. (1998). Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium. Public Choice 95: 149-175.
Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L.E. (1993). Democracy and decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, J.R. and Guerette, S.D. (1992). An experimental study of expressive voting. Public Choice 73: 251-260.
Conover, P.J. and Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy: I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore. American Journal of Political Science 30: 50-78.
Cox, G.W. (1988). Closeness and turnout: A methodological note. Journal of Politics 50: 768-775.
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall.
Faith, R.L. and Tollison, R.D. (1990). Expressive and economic voting. In W.M. Crain and R.D. Tollison (Eds.), Predicting politics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Fischer, A.J. (1996). A further experimental study of expressive voting. Public Choice 88: 171-184.
Glazer, A. and Grofman, B. (1992). A positive correlation between turnout and plurality does not refute the rational voter model. Quality and Quantity 26: 85-93.
Marcus, G. (1988). The structure of emotional response: 1984 presidential candidates. American Political Science Review 82: 735-761.
Matsusaka, J.G. and Palda, F. (1993). The Downsian voter meets the ecological fallacy. Public Choice 77: 855-879.
McFadden, D. (1978). Modelling the choice of residential location. In A. Karlvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, and J. Weibull (Eds.), Spatial interaction theory and planning models. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
McFadden, D. (1981). Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In C.F. Manski and D. McFadden (Eds.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. Cambridge: MIT Press.
McFadden, D. (1984). Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. In Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science 35: 228-278.
Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1997). A political economic history of roll call voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Riker, W.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review 62: 25-43.
Tullock, G. (1971). The charity of the uncharitable. Economic Inquiry 9: 379-392.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kan, K., Yang, C. On expressive voting: Evidence from the 1988 U.S. presidential election. Public Choice 108, 295–312 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017556626815
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017556626815
Keywords
- Public Finance
- Presidential Election
- Marked Contrast
- Substantial Influence
- Vote Behavior