, Volume 441, Issue 1, pp 173–183 | Cite as

Seabed photography, environmental assessment and evidence for deep-water trawling on the continental margin west of the Hebrides

  • J. M. Roberts
  • S. M. Harvey
  • P. A. Lamont
  • J. D. Gage
  • J. D. Humphery


A photographic survey in 1998 of the seabed along depth transects from 700 to 1300 m across the N.E. Atlantic continental slope off north-west Scotland shows clear depth-related change in sediment type and megabenthic community in an environment where biological communities and species distributions are poorly known. Small-scale features, such as trawl marks and dense fields of xenophyophores, were resolved that may have remained unknown using conventional sampling or lower resolution imaging techniques. Because xenophyophores accumulate barite, a constituent of some drilling muds, their local-scale occurrences will be important to baseline environmental survey prior to hydrocarbon prospecting in deep water. Our results indicate that deep-sea trawling is physically impacting the seabed to depths of more than 1000 m. The persistence and biological consequence of this impact is unknown, but may depend on sediment type and natural physical disturbance. Comparison with similar seabed photographs taken from a neighbouring area in 1988, which show a high incidence of trawl marks, indicates that such impacts have been taking place over at least 10 years.

shelf edge hydrocarbon exploration environmental impact assessment trawl scars xenophyophores Atlantic Frontier fishing impacts 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bett, B. J., 1999. Cruise Report No. 25. RRS Charles Darwin Cruise 112C, 19 May-24 June, 1998. Atlantic Margin Environmental Survey: Seabed survey of the deep-water areas (17th Round Tranches) to the north and west of Scotland. NERC/University of Southampton. Southampton Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, U.K.Google Scholar
  2. Bett, B. J., 2000. Signs and symptoms of deepwater trawling on the Atlantic margin. In: Man-Made Objects on the Seafloor 2000. Society for Underwater Technology, 80 Coleman Street, London, EC2R 5BJ, U.K.: 107–118.Google Scholar
  3. Bluhm, H., G. Schriever & H. Thiel, 1995. Megabenthic recolonization in an experimentally disturbed abyssal manganese nodule area. Mar Georesour. Geotechnol. 13(4): 393–416.Google Scholar
  4. Borowski, C. & H. Thiel, 1998. Deep-sea macrofaunal impacts of a large-scale physical disturbance experiment in the Southeast Pacific. Deep-Sea Res. II 45: 55–81.Google Scholar
  5. Bullough, L. W., W. R. Turrell, P. Buchan & I. G. Priede, 1998. Commercial deep water trawling at sub-zero temperatures-observations from the Faroe-Shetland channel. Fisheries Research 39: 33–41.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, J. M., J. M. Addy, R. A. Blackman, J. R. Blanchards, J. E. Ferbrache, D. C. Moore, H. J. Somerville, A. Whitehead & T. Wilkinson, 1982. Environmental effects of the use of oil-based drilling muds in the North Sea. Mar. Poll. Bull. 15: 363–370.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Trade and Industry, 1999. Development of the oil and gas resources of the UK. Publications Centre of the Stationary Office, PO Box 276, London, U.K.Google Scholar
  8. Enterprise Oil plc (1998). Tranche 38 Exploration well 154/1-A Environmental Statement. Project Number W/197/1998. Report Number EOL/EST/475/001. Enterprise Oil plc, Grand Buildings, Trafalgar Square, London, WC2N 5EJ, U.K.Google Scholar
  9. Gage, J. D., M. Pearson, A. M. Clark, G. L. J. Paterson & P. A. Tyler, 1983. Echinoderms of the Rockall Trough and adjacent areas I. Crinoidea, Asteroidea and Ophiuroidea. Bull. British Mus. (Natural History), Zool. Ser. 45(5): 263–308.Google Scholar
  10. Gooday, A. J., 1990. Recent deep-sea agglutinated foraminifera: A brief review. Paleoecology, Biostratigraphy, Paleoceanography and Taxonomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera. C. Hemleben et al., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 271–304.Google Scholar
  11. Gooday, A. J., 1984. Records of deep-sea rhizopod tests inhabited by metazoans in the North-east Atlantic. Sarsia 69: 45–53.Google Scholar
  12. Gooday, A. J., B. J. Bett & D. N. Pratt., 1993. Direct observation of episodic growth in an abyssal xenophyophore (Protista). Deep-Sea Res. 40(11/12): 2131–2143.Google Scholar
  13. Gooday, A. J. & J. A. Nott, 1982. Intracellular barite crystalls in two xenophyophores, Aschemonella ramuliformis and Galatheammina sp. (Protista: Rhizopoda) with comments on the taxonomy of A. ramuliformis. J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. 62: 595–605.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, J. D. M. (in press). Deep-water fisheries at the Atlantic Frontier. Continental Shelf Res.Google Scholar
  15. Hartley, J. P., 1996. Environmental monitoring of offshore oil and gas drilling discharges-a caution on the use of barium as a tracer. Mar. Poll. Bull. 32(10): 727–733.Google Scholar
  16. Hopwood, J. D., S. Mann & A. J. Gooday, 1997. The crystallography and possible origin of barium sulphate in deep sea rhizopod protists (Xenophyophorea). J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. 77: 969–987.Google Scholar
  17. Howe, J. A. & J. D. Humphery, 1995. Photographic evidence for slope-current activity, Hebrides Slope, NE Atlantic Ocean. Scottish J. Geol. 30(2): 107–115.Google Scholar
  18. Hudgins, C. M., 1994. Chemical use in North Sea oil and gas E & P. J. Petroleum Technology 46(1): 67–74.Google Scholar
  19. Jennings, S. & M. J. Kaiser, 1998. The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems. Adv. mar. Biol. 34: 201–352.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, J. B., 1992. Environmental impact of trawling on the seabed: a review. N. Z. J. mar. and Freshwater Res. 26: 59–67.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, K., J. D. Gage, G. B. Shimmield, J. D. M. Gordon, C. Cromey, J.M. Roberts, P. A. Lamont, R. Harvey, J. L. G. Vecino, K. Kroeger. T. Shimmield, E. Breuer, J. Foster, S. M. Harvey, I. Ezzi, P. McGarr, S. Swan, K. D. Black & J. Watson, 1998. Environmental Assessment on behalf of Enterprise Oil Ltd. in 17th Round Licence Block 154/1 (58° 50'-59° 00' N, 07° 48'-08° 00' W). Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory & Scottish Association for Marine Science, PO Box 3, Oban, PA34 4AD, U.K.Google Scholar
  22. Kukert, H. & C. R. Smith, 1992. Disturbance, colonization and succession in a deep-sea sediment community: artificial-mound experiments. Deep-Sea Res. 39: 1349–1371.Google Scholar
  23. Lamont, P. A. & J. D. Gage, 1998. Dense brittle star population on the Scottish continental slope. Echinoderms San Francisco. Rotterdam, Balkema: 377–392.Google Scholar
  24. Levin, L. A., 1991. Interactions between metazoans and large, agglutinating protozoans: implications for the community structure of deep-sea benthos. Am. Zool. 31: 886–900.Google Scholar
  25. Levin, L. A., D. J. DeMaster, L. D. McCann & C. L. Thomas, 1986. Effects of giant protozoans (class: Xenophyophorea) on deepseamount benthos. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 29: 99–104.Google Scholar
  26. Levin, L. A. & C. L. Thomas, 1988. The ecology of xenophyophores (Protista) on eastern Pacific seamounts. Deep-Sea Res. 35: 2003–2027.Google Scholar
  27. Odell, P. R., 1996. Britain's North Sea oil and gas production: a critical review. Energy Exploration and Exploitation 14(1): 3–11.Google Scholar
  28. Olsgard, F. & J. S. Gray, 1995. A comprehensive analysis of the effects of offshore oil and gas exploration and production on the benthic communities of the Norweigan continental shelf. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 122: 277–306.Google Scholar
  29. Piepenburg, D. & K. Von Juterzenka, 1994. Abundance, biomass and spatial distribution patterns of brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) on the Koleinsey Ridge north of Iceland. Polar Biol. 14: 185–194.Google Scholar
  30. Schriever, G., A. Ahnert, H. Bluhm, C. Borowski & H. Thiel, 1997. Results of the large scale deep-sea environmental impact study DISCOL during eight years of investigation. In Chung, J. S., B. M. Das, T. Matsui & H. Thiel (eds), Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, USA, 25–30 May 1997, ISOPE Golden Co., U.S.A., Volume 1, pp 438–444.Google Scholar
  31. Seilacher, A., 1953. Studien zur palichnologie. I Uber die methoden der palichnologie. Neues Jahrbuch der Geologie und Palaontologie 96: 421–52.Google Scholar
  32. Tendal, O. S., 1972. A monograph of the Xenophyophoria (Rhizopodea, Protozoa). Galathea Report 12: 7–99.Google Scholar
  33. Tendal O. S & A. J, Gooday, 1981. Xenophyophoria (Rhizopoda, Protozoa) in bottom photographs from the bathyal and abyssal NE Atlantic. Oceanol. Acta 4: 415–422.Google Scholar
  34. Wakefield, W. W. & A. Genin, 1987. The use of a Canadian (perspective) grid in deep-sea photography. Deep-Sea Res. 34: 469–478.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Roberts
    • 1
  • S. M. Harvey
    • 2
  • P. A. Lamont
    • 1
  • J. D. Gage
    • 1
  • J. D. Humphery
    • 3
  1. 1.Dunstaffnage Marine LaboratoryScottish Association for Marine ScienceOban, ArgyllU.K.
  2. 2.Dunstaffnage Marine LaboratoryCentre for Coastal and Marine SciencesOban, ArgyllU.K.
  3. 3.Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, Bidston ObservatoryCentre for Coastal and Marine SciencesBirkenhead, WirralU.K.

Personalised recommendations