Skip to main content
Log in

Who opposes government arts funding?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the reasons for the controversy overpublic arts funding are well-understood,less clear is the set of variables thatassociates with strong opposition orsupport for arts subsidies. Using data fromthe General Social Survey, this paperbuilds a model to predict opposition basedon ideological, economic, and demographiccharacteristics. The most importantpredictors of opposition are found to bepolitical views, gender, income, privatedonations to the arts, and region ofresidence. The results in this papersuggest that the benefits of public artsfunding accrue primarily to those in thehighest income class, and that supportvaries somewhat according to the level ofgovernment providing the funding.

``The far right is waging a war for the soulof America by making art a partisan issue.And by trying to cut these arts programs,which bring culture, education, and joyinto the lives of ordinary Americans, theyare hurting the very people they claim torepresent.''

Barbra Streisand, in a speech delivered atHarvard University (1995)

The National Endowment for the Arts hasbecome a play thing ... for an elitegroup.

Newt Gingrich, in an interview on C-SPAN(Lamb, 1994)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Council for the Arts (1996). Americans and the Arts, 7th ed. Washington, DC: American Council for the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baitz, J.R. (1999). A shameful appeasement. New York Times (3 October).

  • Brooks, A.C. (1997) Toward a demand-side cure for cost disease in the performing arts. Journal of Economic Issues 31: 197-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.A., Smith, T.W. and Marsden, P.V. (1999). General social surveys, 1972-1998: Cumulative codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and Pettit, B. (1999). Surveys of public attitudes toward the arts: What surveys tell us about the arts, political trials-and how they might tell us even more. Arts Education Policy Review 100: 32-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (14 April 1990). Obscene in the midwest. pp. 24-25.

  • Epstein, J. (1996). W.C. Fields was wrong: Why, despite everything, Republicans should not abandon the arts. The Weekly Standard (3 June) 1: 29-36.

  • Hart, K.C. (1984). Changing public attitudes toward public funding of the arts. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 471: 45-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstein, J.L. and Zald, M. (1984). American conservatism and government funding of the social sciences and the arts. Sociological Inquiry 54: 171-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, R. (1991). John R. Commons and the progressive context. Midwest Quarterly 32: 324-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvik, L. (1997). Ten good reasons to eliminate funding for the national endowment for the arts. The Backgrounder 1110, The Heritage Foundation.

  • Kauffman, B. (1990). Subsidies to the arts: Cultivating mediocrity. Policy Analysis 137.

  • Lamb, B. (1994). Interview with Newt Gingnich. C-SPAN, aired December 30, 1994.

  • National Research Center of the Arts (various years). Americans and the arts. New York: National Research Center for the Arts.

  • NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll, 14–17 January 1995.

  • Neuman, W.R. (1990). The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly 54: 159-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, R.B. (1951). Midwestern progressive politics: A historical study of its origins and development, 1870;1950. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parachini, A. (1990). Survey finds wide support for Bush stance on NEA: Survey also found that 93 percent of Americans believe the public has a right to view controversial art. Los Angeles Times (20 April): F12.

  • Pettit, B. and DiMaggio, P. (1998). Public sentiment towards the arts: A critical reanalysis of 13 opinion surveys. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies Working Paper 5-3/98.

  • San Diego Union-Tribune (1988). Arts attitudes. 17 March, p. C5.

  • Streisand, B. (1995). The artist as citizen. Americans for the Arts. http://artsusa.org. Last accessed: March, 2000.

  • Throsby, C.D. (1994). The production and consumption of the arts: A view of cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature 32: 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C.S. (1992). The war on culture. In: R. Bolton (Ed.), Culture wars: Documents from recent controversies. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J.R. (1991). Information, values and opinion. American Political Science Review 85: 1215-1238.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooks, A.C. Who opposes government arts funding?. Public Choice 108, 355–367 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017544928115

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017544928115

Keywords

Navigation