Skip to main content
Log in

Bioassessment of Streams using Macroinvertebrates: Are the Chironomidae Necessary?

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the sensitivity of commonly usedbioassessment metrics to detect organic impairment ofstreams using data sets that varied only in the inclusion orexclusion of Chironomidae identified to genus. We evaluatedsituations in two contrasting ecoregions of Missouri, U.S.A.,the Ozark ecoregion and the Prairie ecoregion whereChironomidae comprise an average of 32 and 42%,respectively, of the total number of individuals. The without-Chironomidae data showed either identical or greatersensitivity than with Chironomidae data in every case whenusing the metrics total taxa, biotic index, Shannon'sdiversity index, and % dominant taxon. We conclude thatbioassessment programs employing commonly-used metrics thatusually incorporate Chironomidae may become more efficientby eliminating Chironomidae from the protocols and usingthose resources for analyzing additional sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bailey, R. G.: 1995, ‘Descriptions of the ecoregions of the United States’, 2nd edn., Miscellaneous Publication No. 1391, Map scale 1:7 500 000, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 108 pp.

  • Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Griffith, G. E., Frydenborg, R., McCarron, E., White, J. S. and Bastian, M. L.: 1996, ‘A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebrates’, J. North American Benthol. Soc. 15, 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D. R. and Metcalfe-Smith, J. L.: 1992, ‘A comparison of sampling techniques and summary indices for assessment of water quality in the Yamaska River, Quebec, based on benthic macroinvertebrates’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 21, 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck Jr., W. M.: 1955, ‘Suggested method for reporting biotic data’, Sewage Ind.Wastes 17, 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, W. P. and Ferrington Jr., L. C.: 1984, ‘Chironomidae’, Chapter 25, in: R. W. Merritt and K. W. Cummins (eds.), An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd edn., Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, Iowa, 722 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrarese, U. and Bertocco, M.: 1992, ‘The chironomids (Diptera:Chironomidae) of the Teva Creek, Italy and their use in water quality assessment’, Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali Acta Biologica 67, 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrington, L. C., Blackwood, M., Wright, C. A., Crisp, N. H., Kavanaugh, J. L. and Schmidt, F. J.: 1991, Sediment and Stream Water Quality in a Changing Environment: Trends and Explanation, IAHS Publication No. 203, 181–190.

  • Gaufin, A. R.: 1958, ‘The effects of pollution on a midwestern stream’, Ohio J. Sci. 58, 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaford, M. J. and Resh, V. H.: 1995, ‘Variability in macroinvertebrate rapid-bioassessment surveys and habitat assessments in a northern California stream’, J. North American Benthol. Soc. 14, 430–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilsenhoff, W. L.: 1987, ‘An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution’, Great Lakes Entomol. 20, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, D. G. and Moffett, M. F.: 1988, ‘Proposed biotic and habitat indices for use in Kansas streams’, Report No. 35, Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas, 128 pp.

  • Lenat, D. R.: 1993, ‘A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings’, J. North American Benthol. Soc. 12, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R. and Barbour, M. T.: 1994, ‘Using Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Structure for Rapid, Cost Effective, Water Quality Monitoring: Rapid Bioassessment’ in: S. L. Loeb and A. Spacie (eds.), Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 187–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plafkin, J. L., Barbour, M. T., Porter, K. D., Gross, S. K. and Hughes, R. M.: 1989, Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers. Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, EPA/444/4–89–001, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F., Sarver, R. J., Wang, N., Wallace, G. S., Weiland, M. and Peterson, J. T.: 1997, ‘Development of regionally-based biological criteria for Missouri streams’, Final Report to the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

  • Resh V. H., Norris, R. H. and Barbour, M. T.: 1995, ‘Design and implementation of rapid bioassessment approaches for water resource monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates’, Austral. J. Ecol. 20, 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. E.: 1929, ‘The bottom fauna of the middle Illinois River 1913–1925. Its distribution, abundance, valuation and index in the study of stream pollution’, Bull. Illinois Natur. Hist. Surv. 17, 387–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saether, O. A.: 1979, ‘Chironomid communities as water quality indicators’, Hol. Ecol. 2, 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. W.: 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 125 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, W. F.: 1991, ‘Indexing deformities in ligulae and antennae of Procladius larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae): Application to contaminant-stressed environments’, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48, 1151–1166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles F. Rabeni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rabeni, C.F., Wang, N. Bioassessment of Streams using Macroinvertebrates: Are the Chironomidae Necessary?. Environ Monit Assess 71, 177–185 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017523115381

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017523115381

Navigation