Skip to main content
Log in

Bribing votes: A new explanation to the ``inequality-redistribution'' puzzle in LDC's

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent empirical literature on redistribution and developmentemphasizes two main evidences: (i) more redistribution generallyinduces higher growth rates and (ii) more inequality does notnecessarily increase the political demand for redistribution.These stylized facts are at odds with the correlations observedin developed countries. Several theoretical arguments can beadvanced to explain these puzzles. In this paper, it is shownthat ``vote purchases'' may be seen as an additional argument toexplain puzzle (ii). We formalize this idea and examine theconditions under which vote bribes may be an obstacle toredistribution (and thus to growth) in a developing economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ades, A. and Verdier, T. (1996). The rise and fall of Elites: Economic development and social polarization in rent-seeking societies. Delta Discussion paper, 96-13.

  • Alésina, A. and Rodrick, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 465-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benabou, R. (1996). Inequality and growth. CEPR Discussion paper, 1450.

  • Bourguignon, F. and Verdier, T. (1997). Oligarchy, democracy, inequality and growth. Delta Discussion paper, 9710.

  • Bourguignon, F. and Verdier, T. (1999). Is financial openness bad for education? A political economy perspective on development. Paper presented at the EEA meeting, 3–4 September. Santiago de Compostela.

  • Docquier, F. and Rapoport, H. (1999). Croissance, redistribution et inégalités dans un modè le de fuite des cerveaux. Revue Economique 50: 499-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glomm, G. (1997). Parental choice of human capital investment. Journal of Development Economics 53: 99-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, R. (1993). Political equilibrium, income redistribution and growth. Review of Economic Studies 60: 755-776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income redistribution and democracy: What the data say? Journal of Economic Growth 1: 149-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? American Economic Review 84: 600-621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Paul, G. (1994). The dynamics of exclusion and fiscal conservatism. CEPR Working paper, 998.

  • Saint-Paul, G. and Verdier, T. (1993). Education, democracy and growth. Journal of Development Economics 42: 399-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Paul, G. and Verdier, T. (1996). Inequality, redistribution and growth: A challenge to the conventional political economy approach. European Economic Review 40: 719-728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdier, T. (1994). Models of political economy of growth: A short survey. European Economic Review 36: 757-763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdier, T. (1999). Développements récents en économie politique de la croissance: Un survol rapide. Revue Economique 50: 489-497.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Docquier, F., Tarbalouti, E. Bribing votes: A new explanation to the ``inequality-redistribution'' puzzle in LDC's. Public Choice 108, 259–272 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017515915450

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017515915450

Keywords

Navigation