Skip to main content
Log in

Geriatric nephrology units: The way of the future

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of the sub-speciality geriatric nephrology is an exciting development for the future. The main objectives should be to maximise patient independence and minimise deterioration and learn dependent behaviour in this population. To achieve these goals a holistic approach needs to be taken, to the patient, their environment and the efficacy of such units, and this can only be achieved using a multi-disciplinary team approach. In the creation of a geriatric nephrology unit it is important to identify the factors that cause frailty and, if possible, modify or prevent the initial decline using nutritional and other interventions. This requires careful monitoring, not only using the traditional markers of renal disease including urea and creatinine, but also using instruments that measure functional ability. These issues are discussed under the headings prevention, documentation and planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Annual Report 1996. Dialysis and Transplantation, Canadian Organ Replacement Register, Volume 1. Ottawa, Ontario, 1996.

  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. U.S. Renal data systems, Annual Data Report. Researchers Guide, reference tables and ADR slides. Ann Arbor, MI: United States Renal Data System Coordinating Center, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ifudu O, Paul H, Mayers JD, Cohen LS, Brezsnyak WF, Herman AI, Avram MM, Freidman EA. Pervasive failed rehabilitation in center-based maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 23: 394–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Manitius J, Szolkiewicz M, Mysliwska J, Zorena K, Mysliwski A, Jakubowski Z, Lysiak-Szydlowska W, Rutkowski B. Influence of ‘nonhematological’ doses of erythropoietin on lipid-carbohydrate metabolism and life quality in hemodialysis patients. Nephron 1995; 69(3): 363–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jassal SV, Roscoe JM. Dialysis in old age: Are we really doing all we should? Age and Ageing 1999; 28: 503–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chin A, Paw MJ, Dekker JM, Feskens EJ, Schouten EG, Kromhout D. How to select a frail elderly population? A comparison of three working definitions. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52(11): 1015–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas AJ. Nutrition. In: Tallis RC, Fillit H, Brocklehurst JC, editors. Geriatric medicine and gerontology, 5th edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1998; 63: 899–912.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Romagnoni F, Zuliani G, Bollini C, Leoci V, Soattin L, Dotto S, Rizzotti P, Valerio G, Lotto D, Fellin R. Disability is associated with malnutrition in institutionalized elderly people. Aging 1999; 11(3): 194–199.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gotch FA, Surgent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Co-operative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int 1985; 28: 526–534.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kopple JD. Effect of nutrition on morbidity and mortality in maintenance dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24: 1002–1009.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: Association with clinical outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7(2): 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ikizler TA, Greene JH, Wingard RL, Parker RA, Hakim RM. Spontaneous dietary protein intake during progression of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6: 1386–1391.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly MP, Kight MA, Torres M, Migliore V, SDC-RD Scientific Support. The nutritional cost of hospitalization and time needed to achieve nutritional resiliency for hemodialysis patients. J of Renal Nutrition 1994; 4(4): 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jassal SV, Douglas JF, Stout RW. Prognostic markers in older patients starting renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 1052–1057.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris LE, Luft FC, Rudy DW, Tierney WM. Clinical correlate of functional status in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 21: 161–166.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ifudu O, Mayers J, Matthew J, Tan CC, Cambridge A, Freidman EA. Dismal rehabilitation in geriatric inner-city haemodialysis patients. JAMA 1994; 271: 29–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. DeOreo PB. Hemodialysis patient-assessed functional health status predicts continued survival, hospitalization and dialysisattendance compliance. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30(2): 204–212.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Reuben DB, Rubenstein LV, Hirsch SH, Hays RD. Value of functional status as a predictor of mortality: Results of a prospective study. Am J Med 1992; 93: 663–669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Woo J, Ho SC, Yu AL. Walking speed and stride length predicts 36 months dependency, mortality and institutionalization in Chinese aged 70 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999; 47(10): 1257–1260.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deliagiannis A, Kouidi E, Tassoulas E, Gigis P, Tourkantonis A, Coats A. Cardiac effects of exercise rehabilitation in haemodialysis. Int J Cardiol 1999; 70(3): 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobs C. At which stage of renal failure should dialysis be started? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 305–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Innes A, Burden RP, Morgan AG. Improvements in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis technique survival: further experience from a U.K. renal unit. Perit Dial Int 1993; 13(4): 307–309.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson JE, Sturgeon D, Lindsay RM, Schiller A. Use of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a nursing home: patient characteristics, technique success and survival predictors. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 16(2): 137–141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod CM, editor. Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. New York: Columbia University Press, 1949: 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hutchinson TA, Boyd NF, Feinstein AR, Gonda A, Hollomby D, Rowat B. Scientific problems in clinical scales, as demonstrated in the Karnofsky Index of performance status. J Chron Dis 1979; 32: 661–666.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md Med J 1965; 14: 61–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA. Perceived quality of life and preferences for life-sustaining treatment in older people. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151(3): 495–497.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hui E, Ho SC, Tsang J, Lee SH, Woo J. Attitudes toward lifesustaining treatment of older persons in Hong Kong. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45(10): 1232–1236.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schonwetter RS, Walker RM, Kramer DR, Robinson BE. Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: The value of outcome data. J Gen Intern Med 1993; 8(6): 295–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hofman JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB, Teno JM, Connors AF Jr, Desbiens N, Lynn J, Phillips RS. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end of life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cummings NB. Termination of dialysis. In: Andreucci VE, Fine LG, editors. International yearbook of nephrology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997; 12: 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cummings NB, Stocking C, Kohn G. Autonomy and advance directives for chronically ill patients. In: Kielstein R, editor. Ethics and nephrology. Bochum, Germany, 1995: 29–37.

  33. Holley JL, Nespor S, Rault R. The effects of proving chronic dialysis patients written material on advance directives. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 22: 413–418.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith R. A good death. BMJ 2000; 320: 129–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Callaghan, D. Pursuing a peaceful death. In: Hastings Center Report, editor. 1993; 23: 33.

  36. Age Concern. Debate of the Age Health and Care Study Group. The Future of health and care of older people: The best is yet to come. London, 1999.

  37. Mills M, Davies HTO, Macrae WA. Care of dying patients in hospital. BMJ 1994; 309: 583–586.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Semans S. The Bobath concept in treatment of neurological disorders; a neuro-developmental treatment. Am J Phys Med 1967; 46(1): 732–788.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jassal, S.V. Geriatric nephrology units: The way of the future. Int Urol Nephrol 32, 469–474 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017509305946

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017509305946

Navigation