Skip to main content
Log in

Wage Moderation, Innovation, and Labour Productivity: Myths and Facts revisited

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Coe, D.T. and E. Helpman (1995), ‘International R&D Spillovers,’ European Economic Review, 39, pp. 859–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D.T., E. Helpman, and A. Hoffmaister (1997), ‘North-South R&D Spillovers,’ Economic Journal, 107, pp. 134–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nederlandsche Bank (2000), EUROMON: the Nederlandsche Bank' Multi-Country Model for Policy Analysis in Europe, Monetaire Monografieën, 19.

  • Fagerberg, J. and B. Verspagen (1998), Productivity, R&D Spillovers and Trade, Working Paper No. 98.2, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, Eindhoven University.

  • Fase, M.M.G. and P.J. van den Heuvel (1988), ‘Productivity and Growth: Verdoorn' Law Revisited,’ Economics Letters, 28, pp.125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fase, M.M.G. and C.C.A. Winder (1999), ‘Baumol' Law and Verdoorn' Regularity,’ De Economist, 147, pp. 277–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P.A., S. Machin, and J. van Reenen (1993), ‘The Profitability of Innovating Firms,’ Rand Journal of Economics, 24, pp. 198–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, H. den and H.S. Tjan (1974), ‘Investeringen, lonen, prijzen en arbeidsplaatsen: een jaargangenmodel met vaste coëfficiënten voor Nederland,’ CPB Occasional Paper, 2.

  • Hartog, H. den and H.S. Tjan (1975), ‘Investments, Wages, Prices and Demand for Labour,’ De Economist, 124, pp. 32–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, H. den, Th.C.M.J. van de Klundert, and H.S. Tjan (1975), ‘De structurele ontwikkeling van de werkgelegenheid in macro-economisch perspectief,’ in: Werkloosheid: aard, omvang, structurele oorzaken en beleidsalternatieven. Preadviezen voor de Vereniging voor de Staathuishoudkunde, pp. 49–110.

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1994), ‘Heeft Nederland een loongolf nodig?,’ Tijdschrift Politieke Economie, 17, pp. 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1998a), ‘Is Labour Market Flexibility Harmful to Innovation?,’ Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22, pp. 387–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1998b), ‘Löhne rauf für den Fortschritt,’ Die Zeit, 47, November 12, 1998.

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1998c), Mythen in de polder, inaugural lecture, Faculteit Techniek, Bestuur en Management, Technische Universiteit Delft.

  • Kleinknecht, A. and C.W.M. Naastepad (2000), ‘Subtopper in de “nieuwe economie”?,’ Economisch Statistische Berichten, 85, pp. 576–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1994), Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished expectations.

  • Richardson, J.D. (2000), ‘The WTO and Market-Supportive Regulation: AWay Forward on New Competition, Technological and Labor Issues,’ Federal Reserve Bank St. Louis Review, 82, 4, pp. 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiel, H. van der (2000), ‘Subtopper in de “nieuwe economie”?: Een reactie,’ Website Economisch Statistische Berichten at www.economie.nl.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wage Moderation, Innovation, and Labour Productivity: Myths and Facts revisited. De Economist 149, 115–127 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017347417523

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017347417523

Keywords

Navigation