Skip to main content

Problems of Philosophy. Problem #13: Carnap vindicated?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Köhler, Eckehart: 1991, 'Gödel und Wiener Kreis', in: P. Kruntorad (ed.), Jour fixe der Vernunft, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 127–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Michael: 1991, 'The Re-evaluation of Logical Positivism', Journal of Philosophy 88, 505–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Michael: 1998, 'Logical Truth and Analyticity in Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language', in: W. Aspray and P. Kitcher (eds.), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis, pp. 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1996, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited, Cambridge University Press, Ch. 6.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Problems of Philosophy. Problem #13: Carnap vindicated?. Synthese 116, 279 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017115018818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017115018818

Keywords

  • Logical Positivism
  • Mathematical Theory
  • Substantial Part
  • Philosophy Problem
  • Modern Mathematic