Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 120, Issue 1–8, pp 529–534 | Cite as

Perturbed angular correlation study of the ion exchange of indium into silicalite zeolites

  • J.M. Ramallo-López
  • F.G. Requejo
  • M. Rentería
  • A.G. Bibiloni
  • E.E. Miró

Abstract

Two indium-containing silicalite zeolites (In/H–ZSM5) catalysts prepared by wet impregnation and ionic exchange were characterized by the Perturbed Angular Correlation (PAC) technique using 111In as probe to determine the nature of the indium species. Some of these species take part in the catalytic reaction of the selective reduction (SCR) of NOx with methane. PAC experiments were performed at 500ºC in air before and after reduction–reoxidation treatments on the catalysts in order to determine the origin of the different hyperfine interactions and then the degree of ionic exchange. Complementary catalytic activity characterizations were also performed.

PAC experiments performed on the catalyst obtained by wet impregnation showed that all In-atoms form In2O3 crystallites while almost 70% of In-atoms form In2O3 in the catalyst obtained by ionic exchange. The PAC experiments of both catalysts performed after the reduction–reoxidation treatment revealed the presence of two hyperfine interactions, different from those corresponding to indium in In2O3. These hyperfine interactions should be associated to disperse In species responsible of the catalytic activity located in the ionic exchange-sites of the zeolites.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J.O. Petunchi and W.K. Hall, Appl. Catal. B 2 (1993) 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    X. Feng and W.K. Hall, J. Catal. 166 (1997) 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. Yogo, T. Ono, I. Teraski, M. Egashira, N. Okazaki and E. Kikuchi, Shokubai (Catalyst) 36 (1994) 92.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Desimoni, A. Bibiloni, L. Mendoza Zelis, A. Pasquevich, F. S´anchez and A. L´opez Garc´?a, Phys.Rev. B 28 (1983) 5739.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Tabata, M. Kokitsu and O. Okada, Appl. Catal. B: Environmental 6 (1995) 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Kikuchi, M. Ogura, N. Aratani, Y. Sugiura, S. Hiromoto and K. Yogo, Catal. Today 27 (1996)35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Ogura, M. Hayashi and E. Kikuchi, Catal. Today 42 (1998) 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    X. Zhou, Z. Xu, T. Zhang and L. Lin, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chemical 122 (1997) 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. Beyer, R. Mih´alyi, Ch. Minchev, Y. Neinska and V. Kanazirev, Microporous Mater. 7 (1996)333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R.M. Mih´alyi, G. P´al-Borb´ely, H.K. Beyer, C. Minchev, Y. Neinska and H.G. Karge, React. Kinet.Catal. Lett. 60(1) (1997) 195.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Miyamoto, H. Himei, Y. Oka, E. Maruya, M. Katagiri, R. Vetrivel and M. Kubo, Catal. Today 22 (1994) 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.M. Ramallo-López
    • 1
  • F.G. Requejo
    • 1
  • M. Rentería
    • 1
  • A.G. Bibiloni
    • 1
  • E.E. Miró
    • 2
  1. 1.Programa TENAES (CONICET) and Departamento de Física, Faculdad Cs ExUNLPLa PlataArgentina E-mail:
  2. 2.INCAPE (CONICET) and Faculdad Ing. QuímicaUNLSanta FeArgentina

Personalised recommendations