Skip to main content
Log in

Rethinking Bystander Nonintervention: Social Categorization and the Evidence of Witnesses at the James Bulger Murder Trial

  • Published:
Human Relations

Abstract

Bystander apathy is a long establishedphenomenon in social psychology which has yet to betranslated into practical strategies for increasingbystander intervention. This paper argues that thetraditional paradigm is hampered by a focus on the physicalco-presence of others rather than an analysis of thesocial meanings inherent in (non)intervention. Thetestimony provided by 38 bystanders at the trial of two 10-year-old boys for the murder of2-and-a-half-year-old James Bulger is analyzed. It isargued that their failure to intervene can be attributedto the fact that they assumed — or were told— that the three boys were brothers. The way in whichthis category of “the family” served toprohibit or deflect intervention is analyzed. Thisapproach is contrasted with a traditional bystanderapathy account of the bystanders' actions in the Bulger case.It is argued that bystander (non)intervention phenomenonshould be analyzed in terms of the construction ofsocial categories in local contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • ABBOT, P., & WALLACE, C. The family and the new right. London: Pluto Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATKINSON, J. M., & DREW, P. Order in court. Oxford: MacMillan, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • BICKMAN, L. The effect of another bystanders ability to help on bystanders intervention in an emergency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 1, 367-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOROFSKY, G. L., STOLLAK, G. E., & MESSE, L. A. Sex differences in bystander reactions to physical assault. Journal Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7, 313-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOURQUIN, J. The James Bulger case through the eyes of the French press. Social Work in Europe, 1994, 1(1).

  • BROWNMILLER, S. Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon and Shuster, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHERRY, F. Stubborn particulars of social psychology. London: Routledge, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHRISTY, C., & VOIGT, H. Bystander responses to episodes of child abuse. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1994, 24(9), 824-847.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLARK, R. D., III. Effects of sex and race on helping in nonreactive settings. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1974, 5, 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRAMER, R. E., McMASTER, M. R., BARTEL, P. A., & DRAGNA, M. Subject competence and minimisation of the bystander effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1988, 18, 1133-1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • CREIGHTON, S. Child abuse trends in England and Wales 1988-1990. London: NSPCC, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • DARLEY, J., & LATANÉ, B. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 8(4), 377-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • EAGLY, A. H., & CROWLEY, M. Gender and helping behaviour: A meta-analytic review of the social psychology literature. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 100, 283-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVANS, R. The making of social psychology. New York: Gardener Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRANKLIN, B., & PETLEY, J. Killing the age of innocence: Newspaper reporting of the death of James Bulger. In J. Pilcher and S. Waag (Eds.), Thatcher's children? Politics, childhood and society in the 1980's and 1990's. Falmer Press: London, 1996.

  • GRIPSRUD, J. La mort de Silje: Les medias sont-ils responsables? Les Cahiers de la Securite' Interieure, 1995, 20(2), 70-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOWITT, D. Child abuse errors: When good intentions go wrong. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • JACKSON, D. Killing the child in themselves: Why did two boys murder James Bulger? Nottingham: Mushroom Books, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • LATANÉ, B. The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 343-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • LATANÉ, B., & DARLEY, J. Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 10, 215-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • LATANÉ, B., & DARLEY, J. The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • LATANÉ, B., & DARLEY, J. Help in a crisis: Bystander response to an emergency. Morriston NJ: General Learning Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • LATANÉ, B., & NIDA, S. Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 89(2), 308-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • MACNAUGHTEN, P. Discourse s of nature. In E. Burman and I. Parker (Eds.), Discourse analytic research: Repetiores and reading of texts in action. London: Routledge, 1992.

  • MACNAUGHTEN, P., BROWN, R., & REICHER, S. On the nature of nature: Experimental studies in the power of rhetoric. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1992. 2, 43-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILLAR, J., & JONES, H. (Eds.). The politics of the family. Aldershot: Avebury, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORRISON, B. As if. London: Granta, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARTON, N. Governing the family. London: Macmillan, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • POTTER, J., & WETHERELL, M. Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • REICHER, S., & HOPKINS, N. Self category constructions in political rhetoric-an analysis of Thatcher and Kinnock speeches concerning the British miners strike (1984-5). European Journal of Social Psychology, 1996, 26(3), 353-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • REICHER, S., & HOPKINS, N. Seeking influence through characterising self-categories: An analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1996, 35, 297-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSENTHAL, A. M. Thirty eight witnesses. New York: McGraw Hill, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • SENNETT, R. Families against the city: Middle class homes of industrial Chicago, 1872-1890. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • SERENY, G. Re-examining the truth, Part 1. Independent on Sunday, February 6, 1994, pp. 4-10. (a)

  • SERENY, G. Re-examining the truth, Part 2. Independen t on Sunday, February 13, 1994, pp. 5-11. (b)

  • SERENY, G. A child murdered by children. Independen t on Sunday, April 23, 1995, pp. 8-12.

  • SHOTLAND, R. L., & STRAW, M. K. Bystander response to an assault: When a man attacks a woman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 990-999.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMITH, D. The sleep of reason: The James Bulger case. London: Century Books, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • STAINTON ROGERS, R., & STAINTON ROGERS, W. Stories of childhood. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • STONE, L. The family, sex and marriage in England, 1500-1800. London: Penguin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, M. Every mother's nightmare: The killing of James Bulger. London: Pan, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • WATERHOUSE, L. (Ed.). Child abuse and child abusers: Protection and prevention. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • WETHERELL, M., & POTTER, J. Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanation. London: Sage, 1988.

  • WETHERELL, M., & POTTER, J. Mapping the language of racism. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • YOUNG, A. Imagining crime: Textual outlaws and criminal conversations. London: Sage, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levine, M. Rethinking Bystander Nonintervention: Social Categorization and the Evidence of Witnesses at the James Bulger Murder Trial. Human Relations 52, 1133–1155 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016991826572

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016991826572

Navigation