Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organizational Hope: Reaffirming the Constructive Task of Social and Organizational Inquiry

  • Published:
Human Relations

Abstract

This paper develops the construct oforganizational hope as a methodological imperative forstudying and strengthening organizations. It calls onorganizational scholars and practitioners to move beyond the critical impulse by advancing texturedvocabularies of hope that affirm the best and mostpromising dimensions of social and organizational lifeand provide a moral image of the future to guidecollective action. This can be accomplished by defininghopeful research agendas and choosing methods of inquirythat explore and illuminate the hopes and aspirations ofa broad range of organizational members. After clarifying the concept of textured vocabulariesof hope, this paper undertakes a thorough analysis ofhope by tracing the construct throughout the Westernintellectual tradition, highlighting four of hope'senduring qualities, and offering a set of propositionsthat extends the implications of organizational hope toour task as scholars and practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • ARGYRIS, C. Action science and intervention. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973, 19, 115–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARGYRIS, C., & SCHON, D. Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARONSON, R. The principle of hope by Ernst Bloch. Review Essays, 1991, 46, 220–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTLEY, G. Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 1985, 30, 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • BANDURA, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • BANDURA, A. Social foundation s of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARTUNEK, J. How organization development can develop organization theory. Group and Organization Studies, 1983, 8, 303–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagavad-Gita (Translated by S. Swarupananda). Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, 1956.

  • BERGER, P. L., & LUCKMANN, T. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books (Doubleday), 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLOCH, E. The principle of hope ( translated by N. Plaice, S. Plaice, and P. Knight from the German Dasprinzip hoffnung). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, H. B. Reconstructing social theory after the postmodern critique. In H. W. Simons and M. Billig (Eds.), Afer postmodernism: Reconstructing ideology critique. London: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • BUBER, M. I and thou ( translated by W. Kaufmann from the German Ich und du). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • BULTMANN, R. Hope. In G. Kittel and G. W. Bromiley (Eds. and translators), Theological dictionary of the new testament (Vol. II). Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Erdmans Publishing Co., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAPPS, W. H. The future of hope. Philadelphia: The Fortress Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLEGG, S. Modern Organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern world. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONFUCIUS. Analects. W. E. Soothill (Ed. and translator). New York: Paragon Books, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • COOPERRIDER, D. L., BARRETT, F. J., & SRIVASTVA, S. Social Construction and Appreciative Inquiry: A Journey in Organizational Theory. Unpublished manuscript, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • COOPERRIDER, D. L., & SRIVASTVA, S. Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In W. A. Pasmore and R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. I). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAY, J. P. Hope: A philosophical inquiry. Acta philosophica fennica, 1991, 51.

  • DAUENHAUER, B. P. Hope and its ramifications for politics. Man and World, 1984, 17, 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAUENHAUER, B. P. The politics hope. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • DENZIN, N. K., & LINCOLN, Y. S. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERIKSON, E. H. Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • FALS-BORDA, O., & RAHMAN, M. A. (Eds.) Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York: Intermediate Technology/Apex, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • FARRAN, C. J., HERTH, K. A., & POPOVICH, J. M. Hope and hopelessness: Critical clinical constructs. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEYERABEND, P. K. Science in a free society. London: Thetford Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • FISKE, J. Audiencing: Cultural practice and cultural studies. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOLLETT, M. P. Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. London: Pitman and Sons, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRANKL, V. E. From death camp to existentialism. Boston: Beacon, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRANKL, V. E. Man's search for meaning. New York: Washington Square, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREIRE, P. Pedagory of the oppressed. New York: Continuum, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREIRE, P. Pedagogy of hope: Relieving pedagogy of the oppressed (translated by R. R. Barr). New York: Continuum, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREUD, S. The basic writings of Sigmund Freud. New York: Modern Library, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREUD, S. Beyond the pleasure principle. New York: Bantam Books, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRIEDLANDER, F. Producing useful knowledge for organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29, 646–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • GADAMER, H. G. “What is practice?” In Reason in the age of science ( translated by F. G. Lawrence). Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEORGE, J. International relations and the search for thinking space. International Studies Quarterly, 1989, 33, 179–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • GERGEN, K. J. Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • GERGEN, K. J. Realities and relationships.Sounding in social construction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • GERGEN, K. J. The limits of pure critique. In H. W. Simons and M. Billig (Eds.), After postmodernism: Reconstructing ideology critique. London: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • GHANDI, M. K. Hindu dharma. Kalupuri: Navajivan Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • GILLIGAN, C. In a different voice.Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIST, M. E., & MITCHELL, T. R. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17, 183–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLASER, B., & STRAUSS, A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • GODFREY, J. J. A philosophy of human hope. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRANT, M., & HAZEL, J. Pandora.Who's who in classical mythology. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • HANNA, F. J. Suicide and hope: The common ground. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 1991, 13(4), 459–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAZELRIGG, H. Claims of knowledge: On the labor of making found worlds. Tallahassee: The Florida State University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • HERON, J. Experience and method: An inquiry in to the concept of experiential research. Surrey, U.K.: University of Surrey, Human Potential Research Project, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOUSE, R. J., & MITCHELL, T. R. Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, Autumn 1974, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAMES, W. The varieties of religious experience. New York: Macmillan, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAST, V. Joy, inspiration and hope ( translated by D. Whitcher). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • KILMANN, R., THOMAS, K., SLEVIN, D., NATH, R., & JERRELL, L. (Eds.). Producing useful knowledge for organizations. New York: Praeger, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • KINCHELOE, J. L., & McLAREN, P. L. Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitive research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Siage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOLB, D. A. Experiencing learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • KUHN, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd rev. ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOCKE, E. A., & LATHAM, G. P. A theory of setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUDEMA, J. D., MANTEL, M., & IPEMA, W. Rebuilding Cities Through Transboundary Collaboration: Lessons from Vision Chicago. Unpublished manuscript, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • LYNCH, W. F. Images of hope. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARCEL, G. Homo viator (translated by Errand Craufurd). Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARCUS, G. E. What comes (just) after “post?” The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGREGOR, D. The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • MENDES-FLOHR, P. R. To brush against the grain: The eschatology of the Frankfurt school and Ernst Bloch. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 1983, 51, 631–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • METZ, J. Creative hope. Cross Currents, 1967, XVII(2), 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • MILL, J. S. Theism. In Three essays on religion (3rd ed.). London: Longmans Green, 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOLTMANN, J. Theological Perspectives on the Future. Colloquium paper, Lutheran Brotherhood, Houston, Texas: January, 29, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOLTMANN, J. Theology of hope ( translated by J. W. Leitch from the German Theologie der hoffnung). New York: Harper Collins, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORGAN, G. Images of organizations. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORGAN, G. Imaginization. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • NADLER, D. A., & LAWLER, E. E. Motivation: A diagnostic approach. In J. R. Hackmann and E. E. Lawler (Eds.), Perspectives on organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • OLESEN, V. Feminisms and models of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • PANNENBERG, W. The God of hope. Cross Currents, 1968, 18, 284–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • POLAK, F. The image of the future (translated and abridged by E. Boulding from the Dutch Die toekomst is verleden tijd). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • POPKIN, R. H. The history of scepticism.From Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRUYSER, P. W. Maintaining hope in adversity. Pastoral Psychology, Winter 1986, 35(2).

  • REASON, P. (Ed.). Human inquiry in action. London: Sage, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • REASON, P., & HERON, J. Research with people: The paradigm of cooperative experiential inquiry. Person Centered Review, 1986, 1, 456–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • REASON, P., & ROWAN, J. (Eds.). Human inquiry.A sourcebook of a new paradigm research. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • REYNOLDS, F. The two wheels of dhamma: A study of early Buddhism. In B. L. Smith (Ed.), The two wheels of dhamma. Chambersburg, PA: American Academy of Religion, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • RORTY, R. Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROTTER, J. B. Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • SELIGMAN, M. Learned optimsm. New York: Pocket Books, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHON, D. A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRIVASTVA, S., & BARRETT, F. J. The transforming nature of metaphors in group development: A study in group theory. Human Relations, 1988, 41, 31–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRIVASTVA, S., COOPERRIDER, D. L., & ASSOCIATES. Appreciative management and leadership: The power of positive thought and action in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • STANFIELD, J. H., II. Ethnic modeling in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • STOTLAND, E. The psychology of hope. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHWANDT, T. A. Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • TANDON, R. Participatory research and social transformation. Convergence, 1989, 21, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, C. Interpretation and the sciences of man. In P. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social science. A second look. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, S. Positive illusions. New York: Basic Books, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • TORBERT, W. R. Why educational research has been so uneducational: The case for a new model of social science based on collaborative inquiry. In P. Reason and J. Rowan (Eds.), Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester, U.K. Wiley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • TORBERT, W. R. Teaching action inquiry. Collaborative Inquiry, 1991, 5.

  • TEILHARD DE CHARDIN, P. The heart of the problem. In N. Denny (translator), The future of man. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • TILLICH,P. Dynamiics of faith. New York: Harper and Row, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGER, R. Social theory: Its situation and its task. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • VROOM, V. H. Leadership revisited. In E. L. Case and F. G. Zimmer (Eds.), Man and work in society. New York: Reinhold, 1975, pp. 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHYTE, W. F. (Ed.). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEICK, K. E. Affirmation as inquiry. Small Group Behavior, 1982, 13, 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEICK, K. E. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • WIEMAN, H. N. The issues of life. New York: Abingdon Press, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • WITTGENSTEIN, L. Phiosophical investigations (translated by G. Anscombe). New York: Macmillan, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLLHEIM, R. Art and its objects (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOOD, R. E., & LOCKE, E. A. The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987, 47, 1013–1024.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. James D. Ludema
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timothy B. Wilmot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suresh Srivastva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludema, J.D., Wilmot, T.B. & Srivastva, S. Organizational Hope: Reaffirming the Constructive Task of Social and Organizational Inquiry. Human Relations 50, 1015–1052 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016985129104

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016985129104

Search

Navigation