Skip to main content
Log in

An Introduction to the Social Psychology of Insults in Organizations

  • Published:
Human Relations

Abstract

The author argues that insults are an importantsocial and organizational phenomenon, which causespowerful emotions and enters people's personalhistories. It is suggested that insults involve aperpetrator, a target and, often, an audience. The intentionto insult is not necessary, as some insults are theresult of misunderstanding or accident. However, theexperience of being gratuitously offended and the corresponding feelings of shame, guilt, andanger are fundamental to insults. Several types ofinsults are observed, such as exclusion, stereotyping,obliteration of significant identity details,ingratitude, scapegoating, rudeness, broken promises, beingignored or kept waiting. Even more potent insults resultfrom the defamation or despoiling of idealized objects,persons, or ideas. Different insult dynamics are noted; these include an apology, acommensurate retaliation, a disproportionate retaliationand possible escalation, a retaliation against asurrogate and weaker target than the perpetrator of theinitial insult, an affected indifference with apossible delayed retaliation, or more commonly aresigned tolerance which may fuel subsequent insults.Insults as well as retaliation and resistance to themare part of an organization's political process whichestablishes, first, lines of domination/subordination,second, finer gradations of status and power, i.e., apecking order, and third, opportunities for building coalitions and alliances. It is argued thatinsults allow for a certain mobility within a peckingorder, by offering 'matches' for contestants to pitchtheir wit, venom, and courage against each other. They also enable audiences to take sides, thusinfluencing and testing the operation of coalitions andalliances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Albrow, M. Sine ira et studio-or Do organizations have feelings? Organization Studies, 1992, 13(3), 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Man agement Review, 1993, 18(1), 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. Emotion in the workplace-A reappraisal. Human Relations, 1995, 48(2), 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, E. R. Demystifying the glass ceiling: Organizational and interpersonal dynamics of gender bias. Business and the Contem porary World, 1993, 5(Summer), 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, H. S. The invisible bureaucracy. Oxford: Oxford Unive rsity Pre ss, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, G. The origins of the political joke. In C. Powell and G. E. C. Paton (Eds.), Humour in society. London: Macmillan, 1988.

  • Berger, P., Berger, B., & Kellner, H. The homeless mind. Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M. The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, 36, 106–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Unive rsity Pre ss, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calasso, R. The marriage of Cadmu s and harmony. London: Jonathan Cape, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, P. Representations of talk at work: Performatives and “performability.” Managem ent Learning, 1995, 26(4), 423–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., & Jeffcutt, P. Modern organizations-organization studies in the postmodern world. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 37, 686–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. Modern organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern world. London: Sage, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D. L. “Engineering humour”: Masculinity, joking and conflict in shop-floor relations. Organization Studies, 1988, 9(2), 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D. L. Strategies of re sistance: Power, knowledge and subjectivity in the workplace. In J. Jermie r, W. Nord, and D. Knights (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 25–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organization Studies, 1988, 9(1), 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. Stupidity and rationality: Jokes from the iron cage. In C. Powell and G. E. C. Paton (Eds.), Humour in society. London: Macmillan, 1988, pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M. A. The social characte r of bureaucracy: Anxiety and ritualistic defense. Political Psychology, 1985, 6(4), 663–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M. A. The unconscio us life of organizations: Interpreting organizational identity. London: Quorum Books, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. F. On the psychology of military incompetence. London: Jonathan Cape, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, E. R. The Greeks and the irrational. Berkele y, CA: University of California Press, 1950/1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, M. B., & Kasouf, C. J. Knowledge workers and organizational learning: Narratives from biotechnology. Management Learning, 1995, 26(4), 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. (Ed.). Emotion in organizations, London: Sage, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S. Emotions in organizations. In N. Nicholson (Ed.), The encyclopedic dictionary of organizational behavior. London: Blackwell, pp. 151–152.

  • Fineman, S. Emotion and managemen t learning. Managem ent Learning, 1997, 28( 1), 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, S., & Gabriel, Y. Experiencing organizations. London: Sage, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. The interpretation of dreams. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. A special type of choice of object made by men (S.E. XI). London: Hogarth Press, 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis (S.E. XXI, 1). London: Hogarth Press, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. Turning facts into stories and stories into facts. Human Relations, 1991, 44(8), 857–875. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. On organizational stories and myths: Why it is easier to slay a dragon than to kill a myth. In ternational Sociology. 1991, 6(4), 427–442. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • GABRIEL, Y. Organizations and their discontents: A psychoanalytic contribution to the study of corporate culture. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1991, 27(3), 318–336. (c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. Putting the organization on the analyst's couch. European Journal of Management, 1992, 10(3), 348–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. Organizational nostalgia: Reflections on “The Golden Age.” In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 118–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies, subjectivity. Organization Studies, 1995, 16(3), 477–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. Meeting God: When organizational members come face to face with the supreme leader. Human Relations, 1997, 50(4), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y., & Lang, T. The unmanageable consumer: Contem porary consumption and its fragmentation. London: Sage, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75(2), 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. Expe riencing work: Values, attitudes, and moods. Human Relations, 1997, 50(4), 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. Symbols, scripts and sensemaking: Creating meaning in the organizing experience. In H. P. Sims, D. A. Gioia, and Associate s (Eds.), The thinking organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., & Oswick, C. (Eds.). Metaphor and organizations. London: Sage, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., Sex and the workplace: Impact of sexual behavior and harassm ent on women, men and organizations, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., (1989). Sexuality in the workplace: Key issues in social re search and organizational practice. In J. Hearn, D. L. Sheppard, P. Tancre d-Sheriff, and G. Burrell (Eds.), The sexuality of organization. London: Sage, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. J. Smiling, defe rring and flirting: Doing gender by giving “good se rvice.” Work and Occupations, 1993, 20(4), 452–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J., & Parker, M. (Eds.). Postmodernism and organizations. London: Sage, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschhorn, L. The workplace within. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pre ss, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. The managed heart. Berkeley: Unive rsity of California Pre ss, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, E. Social systems as a defence against persecutory and depre ssive anxiety. In M. Klein, P. Heimann, and R. E. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New directions in psychoanalysis. London: Tavistock, 1955.

  • Janis, I. Victims of grou pthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter R. M. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapuscinski R. The emperor. London: Picador, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets De Vries, M. F. R., & Miller, D. The neurotic organ ization. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Barre, W. Species-specific biology, magic and re ligion. In R. H. Hook (Ed.), Fantasy and symbol. London: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidner, R. Serving hamburgers and se lling insurance: Gende r, work, and identity in interactive se rvice jobs. Gen der and Society, 1991, 5(2), 154–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. After virtue. London: Duckworth, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangham, I. L. Power and performance in organ izations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangham, I. L. Scripts, talk and double talk. Man agement Learning. 1995, 2(4), 493–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science, 1990, 1(4), 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J. Stereotyping. In N. Nicholson (Ed.), Encyclopedic dictionary of organ izational behavior. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, I. A case study in functioning of social systems as a defence against anxie ty. Human Relations, 1960, 13, 95–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. E., & Noumair, D. A. Women, Envy and Contemporary Organizational Life. Paper pre sented to the Symposium of the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organizations, Philadelphia, June 27-29, 1997.

  • Parker M. Post-modern organizations or postmodern theory? Organization Studies, 1992, 13(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. Critique in the Name of What? Postmodernism and critical approaches to organization. Organization Studies, 1995, 16(4), 553–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, B. Emotions are social. British Journal of Psychology, 1996, 87(4), 663–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. Power in organizations. Marshfie ld, MA: Pitman, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. Managing with power. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, P. P., Gray, B., & Gioia, D. A. Organization script deve lopment through interactive accommodation. Group and Organization Studies, 1990, 15(2), 212–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, A. Strategy through dialogue and doing. Managem ent Learning, 1995, 26(4), 445–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. Expre ssion of emotion as part of the work role. Academy of Management Review, 1987, 12(1), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. The expression of emotion in organizational life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1989, 11, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, P. Freud: The mind of a moralist. New York: Doubleday, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H. S. Narcissistic process and corporate decay. New York: New York Unive rsity Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H. S. Narcissistic emotion and university administration: An analysis of “political correctness.” In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations. London: Sage, 1993, pp. 190–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. The hidden injuries of class. New York: Random House, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, D. L. Organizations, power and sexuality: The image and se lf-image of women manage rs. In J. Hearn, D. L. Sheppard, P. Tancre d-Sheriff, and G. Burrell (Eds.), The sexuality of organization. London: Sage, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims D., Fineman, S.,& Gabriel, Y. Organizing and organizations. London: Sage, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkel S. Working. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsivakou, I. The written form of planning. Scandinavia n Journal of Managem ent, 1996, 12(1), 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallraff, G. Lowest of the low. London: Methuen, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillman, D. Disparagemen t humor. In P. E. McGhee, and J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research. New York: Springer Verlag, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gabriel, Y. An Introduction to the Social Psychology of Insults in Organizations. Human Relations 51, 1329–1354 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016946332565

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016946332565

Navigation