Skip to main content
Log in

Deep Roles: Twelve Primordial Roles of Mind and Organization

  • Published:
Human Relations

Abstract

The thesis in this paper is that there are 12archetypal roles in groups and organizations. These“deep roles” have their origin in the rolesof the essential family — father, mother, son, anddaughter. In groups and organizations, each of theseimages of family roles will — through the basicdefense mechanisms of splitting and projection —be polarized into a good and bad part: The father as Godor devil, the mother as queen or witch, the son as crownprince or black sheep, and the daughter as princess orwhore. In addition to these eight primary deep roles,there come two secondary ones: the helpers Shaman and Slave whose function are to help the familysurvive spiritually and materially, respectively. Thetwo last deep roles are of a transcendental nature: thehero (winner) and the clown (loser), i.e., the one who has won a good family role, and the onewho has lost it — or never gained it. These 12deep roles are well known from such cultural artifactsas fairy tales and mythology. In groups andorganizations, deep roles are attended with power andinterest. Those who are attributed a deep role in theirorganization will have a similar symbolic power ascharacters in fairy tales and mythology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • ADIZES, I. Mastering change. Santa Monica, CA: The Adizes Institute, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARISTOTLE. Ethics. London: J. M. Dent, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARNOLD, P. M. Wildmen, warriors, and kings. New York: Crossroad, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASHBACH, C., & SCHERMER, V. L. Object relations, the self, and the group. London: Routledge, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • BALES, R. F., & COHEN, S. P. SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York: Free Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARING, A., & CASHFORD, J. The myth of the goddess: Evolution of an image. London: Penguin, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARSTAD, A. S. Arketypiske Roller i Organisasjonen: Unyttig Spekulasjon eller Anvendbar Teori? [Archetypal Roles in Organizations: Useless Speculation or Applicable Theory?]. Graduate thesis, Fakultet for Samfunnsvitenskapog Teknologiledelse, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARTON, S. Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. American Psychologist, 1994, 49(1), 5–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • BELBIN, M. R. Management teams. London: Heinemann, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • BION, W. R. Group dynamics: A review. In M. Klein e t al. (Eds.), New directions in psychoanalysis. London: Maresfield, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • BION, W. R. Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLAKE, R. R., & MOUTON. J. S. Building a dynamic corporation through grid organization. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOLEN, J. S. Goddesses in every woman. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOLEN, J. S. Gods in every man. New York: Harper & Row, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWLES, M. L. Recognizing the deep structures in organizations. Organization Studies, 1990, 11(3), 395–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWLES, M. L. The gods and goddesses: Personifying social life in the age of organization. Organization Studies, 1993, 14(3), 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROMS, H., & GAHMBERG. H. The mythology of the Chrystler crisis. KODIKAS/CODE, Tuebingen: Guenter Narr, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIAMOND, M. The unconscious life of organizations: Interpreting organizational identity. London: Quorum, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESTÉS, P. C. Women who run with the wolves. New York: Ballantine, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREUD, S. Civilization and its discontents. In S. Freud (Ed.), Civilization, society and religion (Vol. 12). London: Penguin, 1991 (originally published in 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • FREUD, S. Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In S. Freud (Ed.), Civilization, society and religion (Vol.12). London: Penguin, 1991 (originally published in 1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • GABRIEL, Y. Organizations and their discontent: A psychoanalytic contribution to the study of organizational culture. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1991, 27(3), 318–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • GABRIEL, Y. Heroes, villains, fools and magic wands: Computers in organization folklore. International Journal of Information Resource Management, 1992, 3(1), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • GABRIEL, Y. The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies, and subjectivity. Organizational Studies, 1995, 16(3), 477–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • GABRIEL, Y. Meeting God: When organizational members come face to face with the supreme leader. Human Relations, 1997, 50(4), 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIMBUTAS, M. The goddesses and gods of old Europe. London: Thames & Hudson, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOLDIZEN, A. W. Tamarins and marmosets: Communal care of offspring. In B. B. Smuts et al. (Eds.), Primate societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAY, R. M. Archetypal explorations: An integrative approach to human behavior. London: Routledge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • HERSEY, P., & BLANCHARD, K. H. Management of organizational behavior: utilizing human resources. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAQUES, E. Social systems as a defense against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In M. Klein, P. Heiman, and R. E. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New direction s in psychoanalysis. London: Maresfield, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAQUES, E. Reply to Dr. Gilles Amado. Human Relations, 1995, 48(4), 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • KETS DE VRIES, M. F. R. The organizational fool: Balancing a leader's hubris. Human Relations, 1990, 43(8), 751–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIM, U., TRIANDIS, H. C., CIGDEM KAGICIBASI, S.-C. C., & YOON, G. Introduction. In U. Kim e t al. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEIN, M. Our adult world and its roots in infancy. Human Relations, 1959, 12, 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVINSON, H. Why the Behemoths fell: Psychological roots of corporate failure. American Psychologist, 1994, 49, 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARGERISON, C., & McCANN, D. Team management: Practical approaches. London: Mercury, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • McADAMS, D. P. The stories we live by. New York: William Morrow, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDOUGALL, W. An in troduction to social psychology. London: Methuen, 1960 (originally published in 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  • MITROFF, I. I. Stakeholders of the organizational mind. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • MITROFF, I. I. Archetypal social systems analysis: On the deeper structure of human systems. Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8, 387–397. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • MOORE, R., & GILLETTE, D. King, warrior, magician, lover. San Francisco: Harper, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOXNES, P. Deep Roles: An Archetypal Model of Organizational Roles. Paper presented at The 3rd Conference on Organizational Symbolism and Corporate Culture, 1987, Milan, Italy.

  • MOXNES, P. Organisasjonens tolv arketypiske roller. [Twelve archetypal roles in the organization]. Norsk Harvard, 1989, (2), 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOXNES, P. Understanding roles: A psychodynamic model for role differentiation in groups. Group Dynamics, in press.

  • MOXNES, P. Hjältar, hexor, horor och andra djuproller i mänskligt samspel. [Heroes, witches, whores, and other deep roles in human interaction]. Stockholm: Naturoch Kultur, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOXNES, P. On the deeper meaning of the Big Five and Personality Disorders. (abstract). International Journal of Psychology, 1996, 31, 2804.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOXNES, P. Fantasies and fairy tales in groups and organizations: Bion's basic assumptions and the deep roles. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1998, 7(3), 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHOLSON, N. Evolutionary psychology: Toward a new view of human nature and organizational society. Human Relations, 1997, 50(9), 1053–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEARSON, C. The hero within: Six archetypes we live by. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • POLLEY, R. B. The diagnosis of intact work groups. Consultation, 1985, 4(4), 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • PROPP, V. Morphology of the folk tale. Austin: University of Texas, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • PUSEY, A. E., & PACKER, C. Dispersal and Philapatry. In B. B. Smuts e t al. (Eds.), Primate societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHEIN, E. H. Organization al culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHARP, D. C. G. Jung Lexicon: A primer of terms and concepts. Toronto: Inner City Books, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEVENS, A. Archetypes: A natural history of the self. New York: Quill, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • STRACHEY, J. Indexes and bibliographies. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XXIV). London: Hogarth Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAYLOR, D. A. When the camcorde r is a bystander (book review) Contem porary Psychology, 1992, 37(4), 296–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, W. I. At the edge of history. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILCOX, K. D. The corporate tribe. Excelsior: MN: Wyer-Pearce, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moxnes, P. Deep Roles: Twelve Primordial Roles of Mind and Organization. Human Relations 52, 1427–1444 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016924801073

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016924801073

Navigation