Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The South Oaks Gambling Screen: A Review with Reference to Australian Use

  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) is a psychometric instrument widely used internationally to assess the presence of pathological gambling. Developed by Lesieur and Blume (1987) in the United States of America (USA) as a self-rated screening instrument, it is based on DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria. This paper describes the origins and psychometric development of the SOGS and comments critically in relation to its construct validity and cutoff scores. Reference is made to the use of the SOGS in the Australian setting, where historically gambling has been a widely accepted part of the culture, corresponding to one of the highest rates of legalised gambling and gambling expenditure in the world. An alternative approach to the development of an instrument to detect people who have problems in relation to gambling is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abbott, M., & Volberg, R. A. (1991). Gambling in New Zealand-Report to the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.

  • Abbott, M., & Volberg, R. A. (1992). Frequent Gamblers and Problem Gamblers in New Zealand: Report on Phase Two of the National Survey-Report to the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.

  • Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1996). The New Zealand National Survey of problem and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allcock, C. (1995). Some ponderings on pathological gambling: An introspective essay. Paper presented at the Sixth National Conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies, Sydney.

  • Allcock, C. C., & Grace, D. M. (1988). Pathological gamblers are neither impulsive nor sensationseekers. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 22(3), 307–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic & Statistical Manual 3rd edition. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Third edition, revised, DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, G. H. C. (1998). Treatments that work in anxiety disorders. [Review]. Medical Journal of Australia, 168(12), 628–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, E., Dickerson, M., & Blaszczynski, A. (1995). The Scale of Gambling Choices: Preliminary development of an instrument to measure impaired control of gambling behaviour. Paper presented at the Sixth National Conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies, Sydney.

  • Battersby, M., & Tolchard, B. (1996). The effects of treatment on pathological gamblers referred to a behavioural psychotherapy unit: I-Changes in psychiatric co-morbidity following treatment. Conference Proceedings, 7th annual conference of the National Association of Gambling Studies, Adelaide.

  • Blaszczynski, A., & McConaghy, N. (1989). Anxiety and/or depression in the pathogenesis of addictive gambling. International Journal of Addiction, 24(4), 337–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., Steel, Z., & McConaghy, N. (1997). Impulsivity in pathological gambling: the antisocial impulsivist. Addiction, 92(1), 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, S. B. (1991). Pathological Gambling: Addiction without a Drug. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondolfi, G., Osiek, C., & Ferrero, F. (2000). Prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in Switzerland. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101(6), 473–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M. (1993). Internal and External Determinants of Persistent Gambling: Problems in Generalising From One Form of Gambling to Another. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M. G., Baron, E., Hong, S. M., & Cottrell, D. (1996). Estimating the extent and degree of gambling related problems in the Australian population: A national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvarci, I., Varan, A., Coskunol, H., & Ersoy, M. A. (1997). DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: Diagnosing and Assessing Pathological Gambling in Turkey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13(3), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R. (1992). Prevalence Estimates of Pathological Gamblers in Quebec, Canada. Paper presented at the Gambling Behavior and Problem Gambling: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Risk and Gambling, University of Nevada, Reno.

  • Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Ferland, F., & Giroux, I. (1999). Prevalence of problem gambling: a replication study 7 years later. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44(8), 802–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Letarte, H., Giroux, I., & Jacques, C. (1998). Cognitive treatment of pathological gamblers. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 36(12), 1111–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R. (1994). Epidemiological surveys of pathological gambling: Critique and suggestions for modification. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10(4), 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1990). Characteristics of pathological gamblers identified among patients on a psychiatric admissions service. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41, 1009–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1991). Evaluation of patients treated for pathological gambling in a combined alcohol, substance abuse and pathological gambling treatment unit using the Addiction Severity Index. British Journal of Addiction, 86(8), 1017–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1993). Revising the South Oaks Gambling Screen in different settings. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(3), 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M. (2001). Substance abuse, pathological gambling, and impulsiveness. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 63(1), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (1999). iAustralia's Gambling Industries, Report No. 10, AusInfo, Canberra.

  • Specker, S. M., Carlson, G. A., Edmonson, K. M., Johnson, P. E., et al. (1996). Psychopathology in pathological gamblers seeking treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(1),–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, Z., & Blaszczynski, A. (1998). Impulsivity, personality disorders and pathological gambling severity. Addiction, 93(6), 895–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolchard, B., & Battersby, M. W. (1996). The effect of treatment of pathological gamblers referred to a Behavioural Psychotherapy unit: II-Outcome of three kinds of behavioural intervention. Conference Proceedings, 7th annual conference of the National Association for gambling Studies, Adelaide.

  • Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Ladouceur, R., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Gambling, delinquency, and drug use during adolescence: mutual influences and common risk factors. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(3), 171–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A. (1991). A Study of Legal Gaming in Connecticut: Problem Gambling.

  • Volberg, R. A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 237–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., & Banks, S. M. (1990). A Review of two measures of pathological gambling in the United States. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., & Steadman, H. J. (1988). Refining prevalence estimates of pathological gambling. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 502–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., & Steadman, H. J. (1989). Prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Jersey and Maryland. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146(12), 1618–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberg, R. A., & Steadman, H. J. (1992). Accurately Depicting Pathological Gamblers: Policy and Treatment Implications. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (1992). The Psychology of Gambling. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. B., & Dickerson, M. G. (1996). The prevalence of problem and pathological gambling: A critical analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia

    Malcolm W. Battersby

  2. Flinders University, South Australia

    Lyndall J. Thomas, Barry Tolchard & Adrian Esterman

Authors
  1. Malcolm W. Battersby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lyndall J. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barry Tolchard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adrian Esterman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm W. Battersby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Battersby, M.W., Thomas, L.J., Tolchard, B. et al. The South Oaks Gambling Screen: A Review with Reference to Australian Use. J Gambl Stud 18, 257–271 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016895221871

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016895221871

Search

Navigation