Skip to main content
Log in

Approaching Complex Cases With a Crisis Intervention Model and Teamwork: A Commentary

  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

This article is a response to the case of SA presented by O'Daniel and Wells. In this response I support the approach used with the patient, and discuss and expand on the applicability of a crisis intervention model to genetic counseling. In addition, I explore the issue of autonomy and informed decision making for patients who are in crisis. I also discuss the surface contradiction between the mandate for nondirectiveness and the need to provide direction during crisis intervention are discussed and reframe the issue as one of process versus content directiveness. I argue that during times of crisis, genetic counselors may need to direct process in order for patients to be able to make autonomous decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson G (1999) Nondirectiveness in prenatal genetics: Patients read between the lines. Nurs Ethics 6:126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum P, Lidz C, Meisel A (1987) Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels D, LeRoy B, McCarthy P, Caplan A (1997) Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: A survey of practitioners. Am J Med Genet 72:172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan N (1978) Treatment in Crisis Situations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green J, Lee M, Trask R, Reinsheld J (2000) How to work with clients' strengths in crisis intervention: A solution-focused approach: In: Robert A (ed) Crisis Intervention Handbook: Assessment, Treatment, Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth D, Rooney R, Larson J (2002) Direct Social Work Practice: Theory and Skills, 6th edn. Pacific Grove, CA: Books/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler S (1997) Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. XI. Nondirectiveness revisited. Am J Med Genet 72:164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parad H (1971) Crisis intervention. In: Morris R (ed) Encyclopedia of Social Work, 16th edn. New York: National Association of Social Workers, pp 196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne M (1991) Crisis intervention and task-centered models. In: Payne M (ed) Modern Social Work Theory: A Critical Introduction. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, pp 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragg D (2001) Building Effective Helping Skills: The Foundation of Generalist Practice. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts A (2000) An overview of crisis theory and crisis intervention. In: Roberts A (ed) Crisis Intervention Handbook: Assessment, Treatment, Research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werman D (1984) The Practice of Supportive Psychotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witmer J, Wedl L, Black B (1986) Genetic counseling: Ethical and professional role implications. J Couns Dev 64:337.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna M. Scheyett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheyett, A.M. Approaching Complex Cases With a Crisis Intervention Model and Teamwork: A Commentary. Journal of Genetic Counseling 11, 377–382 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016837630517

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016837630517

Navigation