Skip to main content

Gender Selection: Cultural and Religious Perspectives

Abstract

Objective: To review the current developments in the field of preconceptual sex selection and to discuss the cultural and religious perspectives as that accompany the scientific progress.

Design: A survey of the major publications in Judaism, Christianity and Islam regarding the issue of gender selection. Examination of current methods of preconceptual gender selection revealed that in vivo methods such as timing of intercourse, the use of ovulation induction medications, and artificial insemination do not appear to affect the sex ratio to a clinically significant degree. In vitro separation of X- and Y-bearing spermatozoa by gradient techniques have been reported to alter significantly the sex ratio at birth. However, these trials were not controlled, and molecular biological techniques could not validate that these methods indeed change the Y- to X bearing spermatozoa ratio sufficiently for clinical use. Nevertheless recent scientific advances have made highly reliable preconceptual sex selection possible by using preimplantation diagnosis (PGD) or sperm separation by flow cytometry combined with AIH or IVF. At present, these methods have been used to avoid sex-linked disorders. Both involve the invasive procedure of IVF and thus are held by most as inappropriate for nonmedical indications. However, improvement in flow cytometry output of sexed spermatozoa might provide in the near future sufficient sorted gametes for artificial insemination. It may be that in the near future, an improvement in flow cytometry output of sexed spermatozoa will provide sufficient sorted gametes for artificial insemination. In such a case, the medical community will be forced to take a stand, whether this reliable noninvasive method of sexing will be allowed for social purposes and even if the practice of PGD should be allowed for nonmedical indications.

Conclusion: The requirement for a man to procreate by having a minimum of two children—a boy and a girl—is obligatory according to Jewish law. According to both schools, Beit Shamai and Beit Hillel, in order to fulfill the obligation of procreation at least one son is required. Therefore the application of sex preselection for nonmedical indications may by of practical importance using the method of sperm separation or sex selection of pre-embryo by PGD. According to Christian view, especially the one of the Catholic Church, gender preselection even for medical indications is forbidden. Islamic legal viewpoint is that fetal sex selection is lawful when it is practiced on an individual basis, to fulfill the wish of a married couple to have a boy or a girl through available medical means.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Shushan A, Schenker JG: Prenatal sex determination and selection. Hum Reprod 1994;8:1545–1549

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leviticus 12:2

  3. Genesis 46:15

  4. Chronicles I: 8:40

  5. Babylonian Talmud, Niddah 3lb

  6. Babylonian Talmud, Niddah 25b

  7. Reubinof BE, Schenker JG: New advances in sex preselection. Fertil Steril 1996;66:343–350

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schenker JG, Halperin M: Jewish family practice and their evolution. Global Bioethics 1995;1:35–47

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mishnah, Yevamot 6:6

  10. Maimonides, Ishut 15:2

  11. Shushan A, Schenker JG: Sex determination. Nature 1994;368:388

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson LA, Welch GR: High speed flow cytometric sorting of X and Y for maximum efficiency. Theriogenology 1999;52:1323–1341

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strom CM, Rechitsky S, Verlinsky Y: Reliability of gender determination using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 72. single cells. J In Vitro Fertilization Embryo Transf 1991;8:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  14. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RML: Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;244:768–770

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eisenberg V, Schenker JG: The ethical, legal and religious aspects of preembryo research. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;75:11–24

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wertz DC, Fletcher JC: Ethical and social issues in prenatal sex selection. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:255–273

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schenker JG: Infertility evaluation and treatment according to Jewish law. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;71:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schenker JG: In-vitro fertilization (IVF), embryo transfer (ET) and assisted reproduction in the State of Israel. Hum Reprod 1987;2:755–758

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shulkhan-Aruch. Yore-de'aa 183–200

  20. Babylonian Tamud, Yevamot 69:b

  21. Schenker JG: Women's reproductive health: Monotheistic religious perspectives. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000;70:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  22. Catholic Church: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Human Procreation, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Vatican City, 1987

  23. Serour GI: Bioethics in artificial reproduction in the Muslim world. Bioethics 1993;7:207–217

    Google Scholar 

  24. Serour GI, Dickens BM: Assisted reproduction developments in the Islamic world. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;74:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  25. Serour GI: Proceedings of the First International Conference on “Bioethics in Human Reproduction Research in the Muslim World,” IICPSR, Vol. II. 1992

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schenker, J.G. Gender Selection: Cultural and Religious Perspectives. J Assist Reprod Genet 19, 400–410 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016807605886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016807605886

  • Religion and human reproduction
  • preimplantation diagnosis
  • sex preselection
  • sperm separation