Skip to main content
Log in

Unmarried Fathers and Parental Responsibility: A Case for Reform?

  • Legislation
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following a Consultation exercise conducted by the Lord Chancellor's Department, the U.K. Government has announced its intention to amend the Children Act 1989 so that the unmarried father who jointly registers the birth with the mother will acquire parental responsibility automatically. In this paper, I draw on the responses made to the L.C.D. Consultation, in order critically to evaluate the arguments for and against reform. A poverty of relevant empirical research makes it impossible to reach a properly informed view on the positive or negative impacts of implementing the proposal. However, the principled arguments: that unmarried fathers and their children are subject to discrimination, or that it is unfair for men to pay child support, yet have no automatic rights with regard to their children, are ultimately unconvincing. I also attempt a more explicitly sociological exploration of the Consultation and reform process, focusing on what it can tell us about evolving social attitudes towards the statuses of `father' and `family' and how they should be valued and protected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, L., Contact between Children and Violent Fathers: in Whose Best Interests? ( London: Rights of Women, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainham, A., “Parentage, Parenthood and Parental Responsibility: Subtle, Elusive Yet Important Distinctions”, in What is a Parent? A Socio-Legal Analysis, ed. A. Bainham,S. Day Sclater andM. Richards (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999), 25-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. andDouglas, G., Law and Parenthood ( London: Butterworths, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity ( London: Sage, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, H., “Madonna Minus Child Or: Wanted: Dead or Alive! The Right to Have a Dead Partner' Child”, Feminist Legal Studies 5 (1997), 225-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., “Parental Rights and Children' Welfare: Some Problems of Strategy in the 1920s”, International Journal of the Sociology of Law 10 (1982), 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. andRuxton, S., Men and their Children: Proposals for Public Policy ( London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R., Masculinity, Law and the Family ( London: Routledge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, H., “Parental Responsibility and the Unmarried Father”, New Law Journal 146 (1996), 782-784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deech, R., “The Unmarried Father and Human Rights”, Journal of Child Law 4 (1992), 3-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, The Children Act 1989: A Guide for the Education Service ( Milton Keynes: Open University, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health, The Removal, Retention and Use of Human Organs and Tissue from Post-Mortem Examination: Advice from the Chief Medical Officer (London: The Stationery Office, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diduck, A. andKaganas, F., Family Law, Gender and the State: Text, Cases and Materials (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, G., “The Intention to be a Parent and the Making of Mothers”, Modern Law Rev. 57 (1994), 636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar, J., “Parental Responsibility: State of Nature or Nature of the State?”, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law (1991), 37.

  • Eekelaar, J., “Do Parents Have a Duty to Consult?”, Law Quarterly Rev. 114 (1998), 337-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar, J., “Parenthood, Social Engineering and Rights”, in Constituting Families: A Study in Governance, ed. D. Morgan andG. Douglas (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar, J. andMcLean, M., The Parental Obligation: A Study of Parenthood Across Households ( Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, S., Stiffed: the Betrayal of the Modern Man ( London: Chatto & Windus, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, E. andSmith, K., Parenting in the 1990s (London: Family Policy Studies Centre, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, M., “The Politics of Child Custody and Gender: Child Advocacy and the Transformation of Custody Decision Making in the USA”, in Child Custody and the Politics of Gender, ed. C. Smart andS. Sevenhuijsen (London and New York: Routledge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forder, C., Netherlands International Law Review (1998), 29.

  • Grand, A., “What is this Thing Called Parental Responsibility?”, Family Law (1994), 586.

  • Greer, G., The Whole Woman ( London: Anchor, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, V., “Domestic Violence and Contact”, Fam. Law 27 (1997), 813-818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, M., “Law Commission Working Paper No. 74: Illegitimacy”, Modern Law Rev. 43 (1980), 299-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M. andRadford, L., Domestic Violence and Child Contact in England and Denmark ( Bristol: Policy Press, University of Bristol, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J.L., “What Does It Mean to be a Parent?”, New York University Law Rev. 66 (1991), 353-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office, Supporting Families: A Consultation Document ( London: H.M.S.O., 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten, I., “A typical Families and the Human Rights Act”, E.H.R.R. (1999) issue 2, 195.

  • Laqueur, T., “The Facts of Fatherhood”, in Conflicts in Feminism, ed. M. Hirsch andE. Fox Keller (New York and London: Routledge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Commission, Illegitimacy, Working Paper No. 74 ( London: H.M.S.O., 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Chancellor' Department, Procedures for the Determination of Paternity and on the Law on Parental Responsibility for Unmarried Fathers ( London: H.M.S.O., 1998a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Chancellor' Department, Responses to Consultation: Procedures for the Determination of Paternity and on the Law on Parental Responsibility for Unmarried Fathers (provided by the L.C.D., 1998b).

  • Lord Chancellor' Department, Annex C: Response to L.C.D.' Consultation Paper on Paternity and Parental Responsibility. The Advisory Board on Family Law (1999). Available at http://www.open.gov.uk/lcd/family/annrep99/annex_c.htm

  • Lowe, N.V., “The Meaning and Allocation of Parental Responsibility-a Common Lawyer' Perspective”, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 11 (1997), 192-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, N.V., andDouglas, G., Bromley' Family Law, 9th edn. (London: Butterworths, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, C., “Children' Experiences of Domestic Violence”, Child and Family SocialWork 2/1 (1997), 13-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, C., Childhood Experiences of Domestic Violence ( London: Jessica Kingsley, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, J., “Old Families into New: A Status for Step-Parents”, in State, Law and the Family, ed. M. Freeman (London: Tavistock, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, J., The Hidden Figure: Domestic Violence in North London ( London: Islington Police and Crime Prevention Unit, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.H.J., Family Connections ( Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.H.J., “Risk and Family Practices: Accounting for Change and Fluidity in Family Life”, in The New Family? ed. E.B. Silva andC. Smart (London: Sage, 1999), 13-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M., The Sex-Change Society: Feminised Brita in and the Neutered Male (London: The Social Market Foundation, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickford, R., Fathers, Marriage and the Law ( Cambridge: Family Policy Studies Centre, 1999a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickford, R., “Unmarried Fathers and the Law”, in What is a Parent? A Socio-Legal Analysis, ed. A. Bainham,S. Day Sclater andM. Richards (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999b), 143-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S., “Thinking about Fathers”, in Conflicts in Feminism, ed. M. Hirsch andE. Fox Keller (New York and London: Routledge, 1990), 222-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Law Commission, Report on Family Law. No. 135 (1992).

  • Shaw, T., “Unmarried Fathers Get Equal Rights as a Parent”, Electronic Telegraph (3 July 1999).

  • Sheldon, S., “ 'sperm Bandits', Birth Control Fraud and the Battle of the Sexes”, Legal Studies (forthcoming 2001).

  • Silva, E.B. andSmart, C. (eds.), The New Family? ( London: Sage, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C., “Power and the Politics of Child Custody”, in Child Custody and the Politics of Gender, ed. C. Smart andS. Sevenhuijsen (London and New York: Routledge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. andNeale, B., Family Fragments? ( Cambridge: Polity, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. andSevenhuijsen, S. (eds.), Child Custody and the Politics of Gender (London and New York: Routledge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, K., “Reasserting Fathers' Rights? Parental Responsibility and Involvement in Education and Lone Mother Families in the UK”, Feminist Legal Studies 7 (1999), 33-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E.,Crisp, D.,Hale, C. andLucraft, H., Counting the Costs: Estimating the Impact of Domestic Violence in the London Borough of Hackney (London: Crime Concern, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J., “Supporting Families”, The Political Quarterly (1999), 225-230.

  • Woolf, M., “Full Rights to Fathers Outside Marriage”, Electronic Telegraph (8 December 1999).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheldon, S. Unmarried Fathers and Parental Responsibility: A Case for Reform?. Feminist Legal Studies 9, 93–118 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016701220289

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016701220289

Navigation