Skip to main content
Log in

Procedures for Evaluating the Impact of Complex Educational Interventions

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of information and computer technology (ICT) to education, particularly when ICT is a component of a major school reform, raises difficult issues for program evaluation. In many cases even defining the program goal is difficult because so many different changes are often instituted at the same time: installation of a local area network, development of technical support, staff development for integrating ICT into the curriculum and for new teaching methods, and so on. To assist program developers and evaluators in gaining control of such complex interventions in education, two basic procedures are described: the history of the future and program logic mapping. The former is a goals and methods clarification scheme, built around a press release that describes at the projected end of the project what was achieved and how. The latter procedure draws on the goals defined in the history of the future, along with the project strategy, to make explicit all of the major links between project inputs and project outputs. This map then serves as a guide for planning an evaluation that would verify causal linkages as well as outcomes. For each type of node in such a diagram, appropriate evaluation techniques are defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Achen, C. H. (1986). The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. (1971). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Research, Rand McNally, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (1988). Computer-based drill and practice in arithmetic: Widening the gap between high-and low-achieving students. American Educational Research Journal 25: 366–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W. (1989). The RAND Change Agent Study Ten Years Later: Macro Perspectives and Micro Realities, Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University.

  • McLaughlin, M. W., and Phillips, D. C. (Eds.). (1991). Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century (Ninetieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), Distributed by the University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F., Light, R. J., and Sachs, J. A. (1996). Sustained inquiry in education. Lessons from skill grouping and classs size. Harvard Educational Review 66: 797–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation-Promise andPerformance, Urban Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of Case Study Research, Sage, Newbury Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Venezky, R.L. Procedures for Evaluating the Impact of Complex Educational Interventions. Journal of Science Education and Technology 10, 17–30 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016664426024

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016664426024

Navigation